Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography

European Radiology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1015-1026

  Lee, Su Hyun ^a   Chang, Jung Min ^a   Kim, Won Hwa ^a   Bae, Min Sun ^a   Cho, Nariya ^a   Yi, Ann ^b   Koo, Hye Ryoung ^a   Kim, Seung Ja ^b   Kim, Jin You ^c   Moon, Woo Kyung ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Boramae Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Pusan National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Elasticity imaging techniques; Imaging; Shear wave elastography; Three dimensional; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; B SCAN; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND SCANNER;

EID: 84878525648     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2686-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Berg WA (2004) Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 42:845-851
2. Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M et al. (2006) Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med 111:440-448
3. Gong X, Xu Q, Xu Z et al. (2011) Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130:11-18
4. Yi A, Cho N, Chang JM et al. (2012) Sonoelastography for 1,786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy. Eur Radiol 22:1033-1040
5. Kearney TJ, Airapetian S, Sarvazyan A (2004) Tactile breast imaging to increase the sensitivity of breast examination. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (Post-Meeting Edition) Vol 22, No 14S (July 15 Supplement):1037
6. Cosgrove DO, Berg WA, Dore CJ et al. (2012) Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur Radiol 22:1023-1032
7. Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ et al. (2012) Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 262:435-449
8. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al. (2010) Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res 12:R104
9. Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N et al. (2011) Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129:89-97
10. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M et al. (2010) Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging - preliminary results. Radiology 256:297-303
11. Hamper UM, Trapanotto V, Sheth S et al. (1994) Three-dimensional US: preliminary clinical experience. Radiology 191:397-401
12. Downey DB, Fenster A (1995) Vascular imaging with a three-dimensional power Doppler system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:665-668
13. Downey DB, Fenster A, Williams JC (2000) Clinical utility of three-dimensional US. Radiographics 20:559-571
14. Hamper UM, Trapanotto V, DeJong MR et al. (1999) Three-dimensional US of the prostate: early experience. Radiology 212:719-723
15. Johnson DD, Pretorius DH, Budorick NE et al. (2000) Fetal lip and primary palate: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional US. Radiology 217:236-239
16. Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH et al. (2006) Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional US. Radiology 240:26-32
17. Cho KR, Seo BK, Lee JY et al. (2005) A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses. Eur J Radiol 54:365-370
18. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system, BI-RADS: Mammography, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
19. Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA et al. (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: Ultrasound, 1st edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
20. Heinze G (2004) A SAS macro, S-PLUS library and R package to perform logistic regression without convergence problems. Medical University of Vienna, Vienna
21. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K et al. (2012) Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology 263:673-677
22. Marusyk A, Almendro V, Polyak K (2012) Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? Nat Rev Cancer 12:323-334
23. Longo DL (2012) Tumor heterogeneity and personalized medicine. N Engl J Med 366:956-957
24. Ginestier C, Charafe-Jauffret E, Birnbaum D (2012) What drives breast cancer heterogeneity: oncogenic events or cell of origin? J Pathol 227:267-269
25. Galardi F, Oakman C, Truglia MC et al. (2012) Inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity in DNA damage evaluated by comet assay in early breast cancer patients. Breast 21:336-342
26. Barr RG (2012) Sonographic breast elastography: a primer. J Ultrasound Med 31:773-783
27. Garra BS (2007) Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 23:255-268
28. Tozaki M, Isobe S, Fukuma E (2011) Preliminary study of ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology. Eur J Radiol 80:182-187
29. Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Kim SJ (2011) Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography. Radiology 259:59-64