Sonoelastographic lesion stiffness: Preoperative predictor of the presence of an invasive focus in nonpalpable DCIS diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1618-1627

  Cho, Nariya ^a   Moon, Woo Kyung ^a   Chang, Jung Min ^a   Yi, Ann ^a   Koo, Hye Ryoung ^a   Park, Jeong Seon ^b   Park, In Ae ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Hanyang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast neoplasms; Diagnosis; Elastography; Tissue characterization; Ultrasound (US); US

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR BIOPSY; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 80052657058     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2103-9     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Liberman L (2002) Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 40:483-500. (Pubitemid 34765035)
2. Morrow M, Venta L, Stinson T, Bennett C (2001) Prospective comparison of stereotactic core biopsy and surgical excision as diagnostic procedures for breast cancer patients. Ann Surg 233:537-541. (Pubitemid 32234952)
3. Lee CH, Carter D, Philpotts LE et al (2000) Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted? Radiology 217:466-470.
4. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH et al (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 218:497-502. (Pubitemid 32121065)
5. King TA, Farr GH Jr, Cederbom GJ et al (2001) A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. Am Surg 67:907-912. (Pubitemid 33738914)
6. Hoorntje LE, Schipper ME, Peeters PH et al (2003) The finding of invasive cancer after a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma-in-situ: causes of ductal carcinoma-in-situ underestimates with stereotactic 14-gauge needle biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 10:748-753. (Pubitemid 40486874)
7. Yen TW, Hunt KK, Ross MI et al (2005) Predictors of invasive breast cancer in patients with an initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: a guide to selective use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in management of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Am Coll Surg 200:516-526. (Pubitemid 40432319)
8. Goyal A, Douglas-Jones A, Monypenny I et al (2006) Is there a role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ? Analysis of 587 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 98:311- 314. (Pubitemid 44195601)
9. Dillon MF, McDermott EW, Quinn CM et al (2006) Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only. J Surg Oncol 93:559-563. (Pubitemid 43806991)
10. Lee JW, Han W, Ko E et al (2008) Sonographic lesion size of ductal carcinoma in situ as a preoperative predictor for the presence of an invasive focus. J Surg Oncol 98:15-20. (Pubitemid 351976948)
11. Rutstein LA, Johnson RR, Poller WR et al (2007) Predictors of residual invasive disease after core needle biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 13:251-257. (Pubitemid 46663152)
12. Moran CJ, Kell MR, Flanagan FL, Kennedy M, Gorey TF, Kerin MJ (2007) Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ patients. Am J Surg 194:172-175. (Pubitemid 47008975)
13. Hung WK, Ying M, Chan M, Mak KL, Chan LK (2010) The impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer 17:276-280.
14. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR et al (2005) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7703-7720. (Pubitemid 46291835)
15. Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X (1991) Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 13:111-134.
16. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al (2006) Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 239:341-350.
17. Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Cha JH, Jang M, Seong MH (2008) Nonpalpable breast masses: evaluation by US elastography. Korean J Radiol 9:111-118.
18. Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C et al (2008) Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 18:2381-2389.
19. Tan SM, Teh HS, Mancer JF, Poh WT (2008) Improving B mode ultrasound evaluation of breast lesions with real-time ultrasound elastography-a clinical approach. Breast 17:252-257. (Pubitemid 351729151)
20. Sohn YM, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Moon HJ, Kim SJ (2009) Sonographic elastography combined with conventional sonography: how much is it helpful for diagnostic performance? J Ultrasound Med 28:413-420.
21. Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM, Chikarmane S, Harston CW (2010) Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 29:551-563.
22. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T (1998) Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 20:260-274. (Pubitemid 29168827)
23. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system-Ultrasound (BI-RADS™). American College of Radiology, Reston.
24. Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS (2009) Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Eur Radiol 19:1621-1628.
25. Fleiss JL (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 76:378-382.
26. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB (2006) Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 241:355-365. (Pubitemid 44632880)
27. Warren RM, Pointon L, Thompson D et al (2005) Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Radiology 236:779- 788. (Pubitemid 41170838)
28. Regner DM, Hesley GK, Hangiandreou NJ et al (2006) Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging-clinical experience of multiple observers. Radiology 238:425-437. (Pubitemid 43134355)
29. Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im JG (2002) US of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiographics 22:269-280.
30. Londero V, Zuiani C, Furlan A, Nori J, Bazzocchi M (2007) Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. Radiol Med 112:863-876. (Pubitemid 350155013)