Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: Consider annual follow-up

Radiology

Volumn 268, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 673-683

  Berg, Wendie A ^a   Zhang, Zheng ^b   Cormack, Jean B ^b   Mendelson, Ellen B ^c  

^a AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CYST; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCIDENCE; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIPLE BILATERAL CIRCUMSCRIBED BREAST MASS; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR BIOPSY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84883140936     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13122251     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Leung JW, Sickles EA. Multiple bilateral masses detected on screening mammography: assessment of need for recall imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(1): 23-29.
2. Organ CH Jr, Organ BC. Fibroadenoma of the female breast: a critical clinical assessment. J Natl Med Assoc 1983;75(7): 701-704.
3. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012;307(13): 1394-1404.
4. Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, et al. BIRADS: ultrasound, 1st edition. In: D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al, eds. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS - breast imaging atlas. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
5. Berg WA, Mendelson EB, Merritt CRB, Blume JD, Schleinitz M. ACRIN 6666: screening breast ultrasound in high-risk women. American College of Radiology Imaging Network. http://www.acrin.org/Portals/ 0/Protocols/6666/Protocol- ACRIN%20 6666%20Admin%20Update%2011.30.07. pdf. Updated November 30, 2007. Accessed January 17, 2013.
6. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Madsen EL. Lesion detection and characterization in a breast US phantom: results of the ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Radiology 2006;239(3): 693-702.
7. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Training the ACRIN 6666 Investigators and effects of feedback on breast ultrasound interpretive performance and agreement in BI-RADS ultrasound feature analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(1): 224-235.
8. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. BI-RADS: mammography, 4th edition. In: D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al, eds. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS - breast imaging atlas. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
9. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299(18): 2151-2163.
10. Berg WA, Sechtin AG, Marques H, Zhang Z. Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience. Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48(5): 931-987.
11. Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM, et al. Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology 2010;254(1): 79-87.
12. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81: 1879-1886.
13. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer: implications for risk prediction. Cancer 1994;73(3): 643-651.
14. Barr RG, Zhang Z, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Berg WA. Probably benign lesions on screening breast sonography in an elevated risk population: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial. Radiology (in press).
15. Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(33): 5640-5649.
16. Brennan S, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Morris E. Breast MRI screening of women with a personal history of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(2): 510-516.
17. Kalish GM, Demartini WB, Peacock S, Eby PR, Gutierrez RL, Lehman CD. Screening MRI for high risk women: should patients with a treated personal history of breast cancer be screened? [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2010; 243.
18. Li J, Dershaw DD, Lee CH, Joo S, Morris EA. Breast MRI after conservation therapy: usual findings in routine follow-up examinations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(3): 799-807.
19. Sickles EA. Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. Radiology 1994;192(2): 439-442.
20. Varas X, Leborgne JH, Leborgne F, Mezzera J, Jaumandreu S, Leborgne F. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179(3): 691-695.
21. Vizcaíno I, Gadea L, Andreo L, et al. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology 2001;219(2): 475-483.
22. Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA. Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology 2007;244(1): 87-93.
23. Berg WA, Campassi CI, Ioffe OB. Cystic lesions of the breast: sonographic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 2003;227(1): 183-191.
24. Berg WA. Sonographically depicted breast clustered microcysts: is follow-up appropriate? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185(4): 952-959.
25. Chang YW, Kwon KH, Goo DE, Choi DL, Lee HK, Yang SB. Sonographic differentiation of benign and malignant cystic lesions of the breast. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26(1): 47-53.
26. Daly CP, Bailey JE, Klein KA, Helvie MA. Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy? Acad Radiol 2008;15(5): 610-617.
27. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dünser M. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173(4): 921-927.
28. Venta LA, Kim JP, Pelloski CE, Morrow M. Management of complex breast cysts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173(5): 1331-1336.
29. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US - diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998;207(1): 191-199.
30. Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, et al. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Radiology 2004;233(3): 850-856.
31. Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK, et al. Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190(5): 1209-1215.
32. Raza S, Chikarmane SA, Neilsen SS, Zorn LM, Birdwell RL. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management - follow-up and outcome. Radiology 2008;248(3): 773-781.
33. Harvey JA, Nicholson BT, Lorusso AP, Cohen MA, Bovbjerg VE. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193(6): 1723-1730.
34. Shin JH, Han BK, Ko EY, Choe YH, Nam SJ. Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(4): W187-W191.
35. Gordon PB, Gagnon FA, Lanzkowsky L. Solid breast masses diagnosed as fibroadenoma at fine-needle aspiration biopsy: acceptable rates of growth at longterm follow-up. Radiology 2003;229(1): 233-238.