Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: Combined US elastography and color Doppler US - Influence on radiologist accuracy

Radiology

Volumn 262, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 80-90

  Cho, Nariya ^a   Jang, Mijung ^b   Lyou, Chae Yeon ^b   Park, Jeong Seon ^c   Choi, Hye Young ^d   Moon, Woo Kyung ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Hanyang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d Gyeongsang National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; B SCAN; BREAST ADENOMA; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DUCT ECTASIA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST PAPILLOMA; BREAST TUMOR; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FAT NECROSIS; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; FOREIGN BODY GRANULOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTITIS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84455200842     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11110886     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299(18):2151-2163. (Pubitemid 351679706)
2. Nothacker M, Duda V, Hahn M, et al. Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue - a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2009;9:335.
3. Feig SA. Current status of screening US. In: Feig SA, ed. 2005 Syllabus: categorical course in diagnostic radiology - breast imaging. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2005;143-154.
4. Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging 1991;13(2):111-134.
5. Burnside ES, Hall TJ, Sommer AM, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging. Radiology 2007;245(2):401-410. (Pubitemid 47612520)
6. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239(2):341-350.
7. Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Cha JH, Jang M, Seong MH. Nonpalpable breast masses: evaluation by US elastography. Korean J Radiol 2008;9(2):111-118.
8. Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C, et al. Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2008;18(11):2381-2389.
9. Sohn YM, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Moon HJ, Kim SJ. Sonographic elastography combined with conventional sonography: how much is it helpful for diagnostic performance? J Ultrasound Med 2009;28(4):413-420.
10. Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM, Chikarmane S, Harston CW. Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29(4):551-563.
11. Raza S, Baum JK. Solid breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US. Radiology 1997;203(1):164-168. (Pubitemid 27142725)
12. Özdemir A, Özdemir H, Maral I, Konuş O, Yücel S, Işik S. Differential diagnosis of solid breast lesions: contribution of Doppler studies to mammography and gray scale imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20(10):1091-1101. (Pubitemid 32937501)
13. Lee SW, Choi HY, Baek SY, Lim SM. Role of color and power doppler imaging in differentiating between malignant and benign solid breast masses. J Clin Ultrasound 2002;30(8):459-464.
14. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system-ultrasound (BI-RADS). Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
15. Jiang Y, Metz CE. BI-RADS data should not be used to estimate ROC curves. Radiology 2010;256(1):29-31.
16. Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS. Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Eur Radiol 2009;19(7):1621-1628.
17. Zdemir A, Kiliç K, Özdemir H, Yücel C, Andaç S, Çolak M. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography in breast lesions: effect on differential diagnosis after mammography and gray scale sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23(2):183-195.
18. Fleiss JL. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 1971;76(5):378-382.
19. Obuchowski NA. Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data. Biometrics 1997;53(2):567-578. (Pubitemid 27262219)
20. Kedar RP, Cosgrove D, McCready VR, Bamber JC, Carter ER. Microbubble contrast agent for color Doppler US: effect on breast masses-work in progress. Radiology 1996;198(3):679-686.
21. Moon WK, Im JG, Noh DY, Han MC. Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent-initial experience. Radiology 2000;217(1):240-246.
22. Alamo L, Fischer U. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasound characteristics in hypervascular breast tumors: comparison with MRI. Eur Radiol 2001;11(6):970-977. (Pubitemid 32755560)
23. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging - preliminary results. Radiology 2010;256(1):297-303.
24. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 2006;241(2):355-365. (Pubitemid 44632880)
25. Warren RM, Pointon L, Thompson D, et al. Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Radiology 2005;236(3):779-788. (Pubitemid 41170838)