Evaluation of interactive teaching for undergraduate medical students using a classroom interactive response system in India

Medical Journal Armed Forces India

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 239-245

  Datta, Rakesh ^a   Datta, Karuna ^b   Venkatesh, M D ^c  

^a Classified Specialist   (India)

^b Delhi Cantonment   (India)

^c ARMED FORCES MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Interactive teaching; Medical education technology; Teaching; Undergraduate education; Voting pad

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSROOM INTERACTIVE RESPONSE SYSTEM; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INDIA; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 84938357082     PISSN: 03771237     EISSN: 22134743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.04.007     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Stuart J, Rutherford RJ. Medical student concentration during lectures. Lancet. 1978 Sep;2:5/1-/216.
2. Steinert Y, Snell LS. Interactive lecturing: strategies for increasing participation in large group presentations. Med Teach. 1999;21:/1-/22.
3. Beekes W. The ‘Millionaire’ method for encouraging participation. Act Learn High Educ. 2006 March 1;7:/1-/26.
4. Guthrie R, Carlin A. Waking the dead: using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom. In: Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York. 2004.
5. Graham CR, Tripp TR, Seawright L, Joeckel G. Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems. Act Learn High Educ. 2007 November;8:/1-/258.
6. Schackow TE, Chavez M, Loya L, Friedman M. Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents. Fam Med. 2004 JuleAug;36:/1-/204.
7. Vana KD, Silva GE, Muzyka D, Hirani LM. Effectiveness of an audience response system in teaching pharmacology to baccalaureate nursing students. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011 Jun;29(6 suppl l). TC/1-/23.
8. Graeff EC, Vail M, Maldonado A, Lund M, Galante S, Tataronis G. Click it: assessment of classroom response systems in physician assistant education. J Allied Health. 2011;40:e1-e5. Spring.
9. Southwick FS, Theodore E. Woodward Award: spare me the PowerPoint and bring back the medical textbook. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2007;118:/1-/222.
10. Latham L, Macdonald A, Kimball AB, Langley RG. Teaching empathy to undergraduate medical students using a temporary tattoo simulating psoriasis. Emerg Med J. 2012;29:/1-/264.
11. Patel J. Using game format in small group classes for pharmacotherapeutics case studies. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Feb 15;72:21.
12. Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Nayak S. Student-involved demonstration approach to teach the physiology of vestibular apparatus for undergraduate medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2011 Jul-Sep;23:/1-/277.
13. Schultz KK, Brackbill ML. Teaching electrocardiogram basics using dance and movement. AmJ Pharm Educ. 2009 Jul 10;73:70.
14. Schreiber BE, Fukuta J, Gordon F. Live lecture versus video podcast in undergraduate medical education: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:68.
15. Li CH, Kuan WS, Mahadevan M, Daniel-Underwood L, Chiu TF, Nguyen HB. A multinational randomised study comparing didactic lectures with case scenario in a severe sepsis medical simulation course. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:/1-/29.
16. Grieve C. Knowledge increment assessed for three methodologies of teaching physiology. Med Teach. 1992;14:/1-/22.
17. Cain J, Robinson E. A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Aug 15;72:77.
18. Mareno N, Bremner M, Emerson C. The use of audience response systems in nursing education: best practice guidelines. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010; 7. Article32.
19. Palmer EJ, Devitt PG, De Young NJ, Morris D. Assessment of an electronic voting system within the tutorial setting: a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN54535861]. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5:24.
20. Pradhan A, Sparano D, Ananth CV. The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: an application to resident education. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;193:/1-/2830.
21. Crossgrove K, Curran KL. Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008;7:/1-/254. Spring.
22. Fitzpatrick KA, Finn KE, Campisi J. Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum. Adv Physiol Educ. 2011 Sep;35:/1-/289.
23. Lee AWM, Ng JKY. Do Not Turn off Your Mobile Phones in My LectureseA Mobile Phone Based Response System. 2008.