Occupational exposure to nanomaterials: Assessing the potential for cutaneous exposure to metal oxide nanoparticles in a semiconductor facility

Journal of Chemical Health and Safety

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 10-19

  Brenner, Sara A ^a   Neu Baker, Nicole M ^a  

^a SUNY POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938202620     PISSN: 18715532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchas.2014.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Global Information, Inc. Market Research Report: Nanotechnology. 2012. http://www.giiresearch.com/report/go138620-nanotechnology.html.
2. Roco M.C., Mirkin C.A., Hersam M.C. WTEC Panel Report on Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020: Retrospective and Outlook 2010, Springer, Berlin and Boston.
3. Oberdörster G., Oberdörster E., Oberdörster J. Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline involving studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 2005, 113(7):823-839.
4. Schulte P.A., Trout D., Zumwalde R.D., Kuempel E., Geraci C.L., Castranova V., Mundt D.J., Mundt K.A., Halperin W.E. Options for occupational health surveillance of workers potentially exposed to engineered nanoparticles: state of the science. J Occup Environ Med 2008, 50(5):517-526.
5. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Current Intelligence Bulletin 60: Interim guidance for medical screening and hazard surveillance for workers potentially exposed to engineered nanoparticles. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2009-116, 2009. Available online: . http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009-116/.
6. Schulte P.A., Geraci C., Zumwalde R., Hoover M., Castranova V., Kuempel E., Murashov V., Vainio H., Savolainen K. Sharpening the focus on occupational safety and health in nanotechnology. Scand J Work Environ Health 2008, 34(6):471-478.
7. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH program portfolio: respiratory diseases. Inputs: NIOSH strategic goals. 2013. Available at: . http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/programs/resp/goals.html.
8. Yanda R., Heynes M., Miller A. Demystifying Chipmaking 2005, Elsevier, Inc, Burlington, MA.
9. Borst C., Gill W., Gutmann R. Chemical-Mechanical Polishing of Low Dielectric Constant Polymers and Organosilicate Glasses 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
10. Brenner S.A., Neu-Baker N.M., Caglayan C., Zurbenko I. Occupational exposure to airborne nanomaterials: an assessment of worker exposure to aerosolized metal oxide nanoparticles in semiconductor wastewater treatment. J Occup Environ Hyg 2015, [in press].
11. Shepard M., Brenner S. Cutaneous exposure scenarios for engineered nanoparticles used in semiconductor fabrication: a preliminary investigation of workplace surface contamination. Int J Occup Environ Health 2014, 20(3):247-257.
12. Cross S.E., Innes B., Roberts M.S., Tsuzuki T., Robertson T.A., McCormick P. Human skin penetration of sunscreen nanoparticles: in-vitro assessment of a novel micronized zinc oxide formulation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2007, 20(3):148-154.
13. Gamer A.O., Leibold E., van Ravenzwaay B. The in vitro absorption of microfine zinc oxide and titanium oxide through porcine skin. Toxicol In Vitro 2006, 20(3):301-307.
14. Lademann J., Weigmann H.J., Rickmeyer C., Barthelmes H., Schaefer H., Mueller G., Sterry W. Penetration of titanium dioxide microparticles in a sunscreen formulation into the horny layer and the follicular orifice. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 1999, 12(5):247-256.
15. Mavon A., Miquel C., Lejeune O., Payre B., Moretto P. In vitro percutaneous absorption and in vivo stratum corneum distribution of an organic and a mineral sunscreen. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2007, 20(1):10-20.
16. Newman M.D., Stotland M., Ellis J.I. The safety of nanosized particles in titanium dioxide- and zinc oxide-based sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009, 61:685-692.
17. Nohynek G.J., Lademann J., Ribaud C., Roberts M.S. Grey goo on the skin? Nanotechnology, cosmetic and sunscreen safety. Crit Rev Toxicol 2007, 27:251-277.
18. 2 particles. Toxicol Sci 2010, 115(1):156-166.
19. Rancan F., Gao Q., Graf C., Troppens S., Hadam S., Hackbarth S., Kembuan C., Blume-Peytavi U., Ruhl E., Lademann J., Vogt A. Skin penetration and cellular uptake of amorphous silica nanoparticles with variable size, surface functionalization, and colloidal stability. ACS Nano 2012, 6(8):6829-6842.
20. 2 nanoparticles through human skin. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2011, 111:142-144.
21. 2 nanoparticles in hairless mice and porcine skin after subchronic dermal exposure. Toxicol Lett 2009, 191:1-8.
22. Gulson B., McCall M., Korsch M., Gomez L., Casey P., Oytam Y., Taylor A., McCulloch M., Trotter J., Kinsley L., Greenoak G. Small amounts of zinc from zinc oxide particles in sunscreens applied outdoors are absorbed through human skin. Toxicol Sci 2010, 118(1):140-149.
23. Nabeshi H., Yoshikawa T., Matsuyama K., Nakazato Y., Matsuo K., Arimori A., Isobe M., Tchigi S., Kondoh S., Hirai T., Akase T., Yamashita T., Yamashita K., Yoshida T., Nagano K., Abe Y., Yoshioka Y., Kamada H., Imazawa T., Itoh N., Nakagawa S., Mayumi T., Tsunoda S., Tsutsumi Y. Systemic distribution, nuclear entry and cytotoxicity of amorphous nanosilica following topical application. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2713-2724.
24. Labouta H.I., Schneider M. Interaction of inorganic nanoparticles with the skin barrier: current status and critical review. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 2013, 9:39-54.
25. Danish Ministry of the Environment.Environmental Protection Agency Dermal Absorption of Nanomaterials: Part of the "Better control of nano" Initiative 2012-2015 2013, DEPA, Copenhagen.
26. Shepard M.N., Brenner S. An occupational exposure assessment for engineered nanoparticles used in semiconductor fabrication. Ann Occup Hyg 2014, 58(2):251-265.
27. Dolez P., Vinches L., Wilkinson K., Plamondon P., Vu-Khanh T. Development of a test method for protective gloves against nanoparticles in conditions simulating occupational use. J Phys Conf Ser 2011, 304.
28. Golanski L., Guiot A., Tardif F. Are Conventional Protective Devices such as Fibrous Filter Media, Respirator Cartridges, Protective Clothing and Gloves also Efficient for Nanoaerosols? 2008, NanoSafe European Strategy for Nanosafety.
29. Golanski L., Guiot A., Rouillon F., Pocachard J., Tardif F. Experimental evaluation of personal protection devices against graphite nanoaerosols: fibrous filter media, masks, protective clothing, and gloves. Hum Exp Toxicol 2009, 28(6-7):353-359. 10.1177/0960327109105157.
30. 2 and Pt. J Phys Conf Ser 2009, 170(1):012025. 10.1088/1742-6596/170/1/012025.
31. Hanley J.T. (Vêtements de protection) Aerosol system and swatch testing of chemical protective garments. Elevated Wind Studies International Conference 2006, 151.
32. Park J., Kwak B.K., Kim Y., Yi J. Efficiency of protective dermal equipment against silver nanoparticles with water aerosol. J Nanopart Res 2011, 13:3043-3049.
33. 2 nanoparticles through protective clothing and gloves under conditions simulating occupational use. Nanosci Meth 2013, 2(1):1-15. 10.1080/21642311.2013.771840.
34. Schneider T., Vermeulen R., Brouwer D.H., Cherrie J.W., Kromhout H., Fogh C.L. Conceptual model for assessment of dermal exposure. Occup Environ Med 1999, 56:765-773. 10.1136/oem.56.11.765.
35. Schneider T., Cherrie J.W., Vermeulen R., Kromhout H. Dermal exposure assessment. Ann Occup Hyg 2000, 44(7):493-499.
36. McArthur B. Dermal measurement and wipe sampling methods: a review. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1992, 7(9):599-606. 10.1080/1047322X.1992.10388051.