Experimental validation of methods for differential gene expression analysis and sample pooling in RNA-seq

BMC Genomics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Rajkumar, Anto P ^a,b,c,d   Qvist, Per ^a,d   Lazarus, Ross ^e   Lescai, Francesco ^a,d   Ju, Jia ^f   Nyegaard, Mette ^a,d   Mors, Ole ^a,d,g   Børglum, Anders D ^a,d,g   Li, Qibin ^f   Christensen, Jane H ^a,d  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b SOUTH LONDON AND MAUDSLEY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d Aarhus   (Denmark)

^e BAKER IDI HEART AND DIABETES INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^f BGI SHENZHEN   (China)

^g AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Gene expression; Next generation RNA Sequencing; Predictive value of tests; Quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; RNA;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRD1 GENE; DIFFERENTIAL GENE EXPRESSION ANALYSIS; DNA SEQUENCE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RNA SEQUENCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION PROCESS; ANIMAL; GENETICS; PROCEDURES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

MUS;

ANIMALS; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MICE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84937963703     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-1767-y     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Korf I. Genomics: the state of the art in RNA-seq analysis. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1165-6.
2. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:57-63.
3. Fang Z, Cui X. Design and validation issues in RNA-seq experiments. Brief Bioinform. 2011;12:280-7.
4. Rapaport F, Khanin R, Liang Y, Pirun M, Krek A, Zumbo P, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R95.
5. Soneson C, Delorenzi M. A comparison of methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:91.
6. Kvam VM, Liu P, Si Y. A comparison of statistical methods for detecting differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Am J Bot. 2012;99:248-56.
7. Engstrom PG, Steijger T, Sipos B, Grant GR, Kahles A, Alioto T, et al. Systematic evaluation of spliced alignment programs for RNA-seq data. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1185-91.
8. Steijger T, Abril JF, Engstrom PG, Kokocinski F, Akerman M, Alioto T, et al. Assessment of transcript reconstruction methods for RNA-seq. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1177-84.
9. Dillies MA, Rau A, Aubert J, Hennequet-Antier C, Jeanmougin M, Servant N, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:671-83.
10. Li CI, Su PF, Shyr Y. Sample size calculation based on exact test for assessing differential expression analysis in RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:357.
11. Garber M, Grabherr MG, Guttman M, Trapnell C. Computational methods for transcriptome annotation and quantification using RNA-seq. Nat Methods. 2011;8:469-77.
12. Trapnell C, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, Goff L, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:46-53.
13. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139-40.
14. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R106.
15. Auer PL, Doerge RW. A Two-stage Poisson model for testing RNA-Seq data. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2011;10:1-26.
16. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R36.
17. Counting reads in features with htseq-count [ http://www-huber.embl.de/users/anders/HTSeq/doc/count.html~count ].
18. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562-78.
19. Chuaqui RF, Bonner RF, Best CJ, Gillespie JW, Flaig MJ, Hewitt SM, et al. Post-analysis follow-up and validation of microarray experiments. Nat Genet. 2002;32(Suppl):509-14.
20. Abruzzo LV, Wang J, Kapoor M, Medeiros LJ, Keating MJ, Edward Highsmith W, et al. Biological validation of differentially expressed genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia identified by applying multiple statistical methods to oligonucleotide microarrays. J Mol Diagn. 2005;7:337-45.
21. Kendziorski C, Irizarry RA, Chen KS, Haag JD, Gould MN. On the utility of pooling biological samples in microarray experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:4252-7.
22. Peng X, Wood CL, Blalock EM, Chen KC, Landfield PW, Stromberg AJ. Statistical implications of pooling RNA samples for microarray experiments. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:26.
23. Kendziorski CM, Zhang Y, Lan H, Attie AD. The efficiency of pooling mRNA in microarray experiments. Biostatistics. 2003;4:465-77.
24. Mary-Huard T, Daudin JJ, Baccini M, Biggeri A, Bar-Hen A. Biases induced by pooling samples in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:i313-318.
25. Xu J, Sun J, Chen J, Wang L, Li A, Helm M, et al. RNA-Seq analysis implicates dysregulation of the immune system in schizophrenia. BMC Genomics. 2012;13 Suppl 8:S2.
26. Ilmjarv S, Hundahl CA, Reimets R, Niitsoo M, Kolde R, Vilo J, et al. Estimating differential expression from multiple indicators. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(8):e72.
27. Anders S, McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Okoniewski M, Smyth GK, Huber W, et al. Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:1765-86.
28. Fang Z, Martin J, Wang Z. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in RNA-Seq experiments. Cell Biosci. 2012;2:26.
29. Kasukawa T, Masumoto KH, Nikaido I, Nagano M, Uno KD, Tsujino K, et al. Quantitative expression profile of distinct functional regions in the adult mouse brain. PLoS One. 2011;6, e23228.
30. Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R25.
31. Differential analysis of count data - the DESeq2 package [ http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.pdf ]
32. EdgeR: differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. User's Guide. [ http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/edgeR/inst/doc/edgeRUsersGuide.pdf ]
33. Roberts A, Trapnell C, Donaghey J, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Improving RNA-Seq expression estimates by correcting for fragment bias. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R22.
34. Leek JT, Taub MA, Rasgon JL. A statistical approach to selecting and confirming validation targets in -omics experiments. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13:150.
35. Liu Y, Zhou J, White KP. RNA-seq differential expression studies: more sequence or more replication? Bioinformatics 2013: doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt1688 .
36. Wu H, Wang C, Wu Z. A new shrinkage estimator for dispersion improves differential expression detection in RNA-seq data. Biostatistics. 2013;14:232-43.
37. Bast Jr RC. Molecular approaches to personalizing management of ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:viii5-viii15.
38. Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic; 2001.
39. Fleige S, Pfaffl MW. RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT-PCR performance. Mol Aspects Med. 2006;27:126-39.