Jagged mediates differences in normal and tumor angiogenesis by affecting tip-stalk fate decision

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 29, 2015, Pages E3836-E3844

  Boareto, Marcelo ^a,b   Jolly, Mohit Kumar ^a,c   Ben Jacob, Eshel ^a,d   Onuchic, José N ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c Rice University   (United States)

^d TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Angiogenesis; Jagged; Notch signaling; Tumor angiogenesis; VEGF signaling

Indexed keywords

JAGGED PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NOTCH RECEPTOR; PROTEIN DELTA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VASCULOTROPIN; VASCULOTROPIN A; VASCULOTROPIN B; VASCULOTROPIN RECEPTOR 2; CALCIUM BINDING PROTEIN; LIGAND; SERRATE PROTEINS; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CAPILLARY DENSITY; CELL DENSITY; CELL FATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEADY STATE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION; ANGIOGENESIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL LINEAGE; DRUG EFFECTS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; NEOPLASM; NEOVASCULARIZATION (PATHOLOGY); PATHOLOGY; VASCULARIZATION;

CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; CELL LINEAGE; HUMANS; INTERCELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; LIGANDS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEOPLASMS; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PATHOLOGIC; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; RECEPTORS, NOTCH; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR A;

EID: 84937862264     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1511814112     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Benedito R, Hellström M (2013) Notch as a hub for signaling in angiogenesis. Exp Cell Res 319(9):1281-1288.
2. Phng LK, Gerhardt H (2009) Angiogenesis: A team effort coordinated by notch. Dev Cell 16(2):196-208.
3. Geudens I, Gerhardt H (2011) Coordinating cell behaviour during blood vessel formation. Development 138(21):4569-4583.
4. Andersson ER, Sandberg R, Lendahl U (2011) Notch signaling: Simplicity in design, versatility in function. Development 138(17):3593-3612.
5. Shimojo H, Ohtsuka T, Kageyama R (2011) Dynamic expression of notch signaling genes in neural stem/progenitor cells. Front Neurosci 5:78.
6. Manderfield LJ, et al. (2012) Notch activation of Jagged1 contributes to the assembly of the arterial wall. Circulation 125(2):314-323.
7. Shaya O, Sprinzak D (2011) From Notch signaling to fine-grained patterning: Modeling meets experiments. Curr Opin Genet Dev 21(6):732-739.
8. Hartman BH, Reh TA, Bermingham-McDonogh O (2010) Notch signaling specifies prosensory domains via lateral induction in the developing mammalian inner ear. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(36):15792-15797.
9. Kopan R, Ilagan MXG (2009) The canonical Notch signaling pathway: Unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell 137(2):216-233.
10. Morales AV, Yasuda Y, Ish-Horowicz D (2002) Periodic Lunatic fringe expression is controlled during segmentation by a cyclic transcriptional enhancer responsive to notch signaling. Dev Cell 3(1):63-74.
11. Hellström M, et al. (2007) Dll4 signalling through Notch1 regulates formation of tip cells during angiogenesis. Nature 445(7129):776-780.
12. Blanco R, Gerhardt H (2013) VEGF and Notch in tip and stalk cell selection. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 3(1):a006569.
13. Jakobsson L, et al. (2010) Endothelial cells dynamically compete for the tip cell position during angiogenic sprouting. Nat Cell Biol 12(10):943-953.
14. Benedito R, et al. (2009) The notch ligands Dll4 and Jagged1 have opposing effects on angiogenesis. Cell 137(6):1124-1135.
15. Boareto M, et al. (2015) Jagged-Delta asymmetry in Notch signaling can give rise to a Sender/Receiver hybrid phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(5):E402-E409.
16. Suchting S, et al. (2007) The Notch ligand Delta-like 4 negatively regulates endothelial tip cell formation and vessel branching. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(9):3225-3230.
17. Lu M, Jolly MK, Levine H, Onuchic JN, Ben-Jacob E (2013) MicroRNA-based regulation of epithelial-hybrid-mesenchymal fate determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(45): 18144-18149.
18. Lu M, Jolly MK, Onuchic J, Ben-Jacob E (2014) Toward decoding the principles of cancer metastasis circuits. Cancer Res 74(17):4574-4587.
19. Jolly MK, et al. (2015) Operating principles of Notch-Delta-Jagged module of cell-cell communication. New J Phys 17(5):055021.
20. Shimizu K, et al. (2001) Manic fringe and lunatic fringe modify different sites of the Notch2 extracellular region, resulting in different signaling modulation. J Biol Chem 276(28):25753-25758.
21. Hicks C, et al. (2000) Fringe differentially modulates Jagged1 and Delta1 signalling through Notch1 and Notch2. Nat Cell Biol 2(8):515-520.
22. Prez F, Granger BE (2007) IPython: A system for interactive scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 9(3):21-29.
23. Clewley R (2012) Hybrid models and biological model reduction with PyDSTool. PLOS Comput Biol 8(8):e1002628.
24. Siekmann AF, Affolter M, Belting HG (2013) The tip cell concept 10 years after: New players tune in for a common theme. Exp Cell Res 319(9):1255-1263.
25. Dudley AC (2012) Tumor endothelial cells. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2(3): a006536.
26. Li C, Wang J (2013) Quantifying Waddington landscapes and paths of non-adiabatic cell fate decisions for differentiation, reprogramming and transdifferentiation. J R Soc Interface 10(89):20130787.
27. Wang J, Zhang K, Xu L, Wang E (2011) Quantifying the Waddington landscape and biological paths for development and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(20): 8257-8262.
28. Kim KY, Wang J (2007) Potential energy landscape and robustness of a gene regulatory network: Toggle switch. PLoS Comput Biol 3(3):e60.
29. Bentley K, Gerhardt H, Bates PA (2008) Agent-based simulation of notch-mediated tip cell selection in angiogenic sprout initialisation. J Theor Biol 250(1):25-36.
30. Noguera-Troise I, et al. (2006) Blockade of Dll4 inhibits tumour growth by promoting non-productive angiogenesis. Nature 444(7122):1032-1037.
31. Thurston G, Noguera-Troise I, Yancopoulos GD (2007) The Delta paradox: DLL4 blockade leads to more tumour vessels but less tumour growth. Nat Rev Cancer 7(5): 327-331.
32. Xu K, et al. (2012) Lunatic fringe deficiency cooperates with the Met/Caveolin gene amplicon to induce basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Cell 21(5):626-641.
33. Yi F, Amarasinghe B, Dang TP (2013) Manic fringe inhibits tumor growth by suppressing Notch3 degradation in lung cancer. Am J Cancer Res 3(5):490-499.
34. Zhang S, Chung WC, Wu G, Egan SE, Xu K (2014) Tumor-suppressive activity of Lunatic Fringe in prostate through differential modulation of Notch receptor activation. Neoplasia 16(2):158-167.
35. Krüger K, et al. (2013) Microvessel proliferation by co-expression of endothelial nestin and Ki-67 is associated with a basal-like phenotype and aggressive features in breast cancer. Breast 22(3):282-288.
36. Barad O, Rosin D, Hornstein E, Barkai N (2010) Error minimization in lateral inhibition circuits. Sci Signal 3(129):ra51.
37. Miller AC, Lyons EL, Herman TG (2009) cis-Inhibition of Notch by endogenous Delta biases the outcome of lateral inhibition. Curr Biol 19(16):1378-1383.
38. Sprinzak D, et al. (2010) Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states. Nature 465(7294):86-90.
39. Sprinzak D, Lakhanpal A, LeBon L, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Elowitz MB (2011) Mutual inactivation of Notch receptors and ligands facilitates developmental patterning. PLOS Comput Biol 7(6):e1002069.
40. Jain RK (2013) Normalizing tumor microenvironment to treat cancer: Bench to bedside to biomarkers. J Clin Oncol 31(17):2205-2218.
41. Zhou JX, Huang S (2011) Understanding gene circuits at cell-fate branch points for rational cell reprogramming. Trends Genet 27(2):55-62.
42. Grosse-Wilde A, et al. (2015) Stemness of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal state in breast cancer and its association with poor survival. PLoS One 10(5):e0126522.
43. Jolly MK, et al. (2014) Towards elucidating the connection between epithelial-mesenchymal transitions and stemness. J R Soc Interface 11(101):20140962.
44. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2011) Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 144(5):646-674.
45. Nikolaou N, et al. (2009) Lunatic fringe promotes the lateral inhibition of neurogenesis. Development 136(15):2523-2533.
46. Jolly MK, Rizvi MS, Kumar A, Sinha P (2014) Mathematical modeling of sub-cellular asymmetry of fat-dachsous heterodimer for generation of planar cell polarity. PLoS One 9(5):e97641.
47. Li D, Masiero M, Banham AH, Harris AL (2014) The notch ligand JAGGED1 as a target for anti-tumor therapy. Front Oncol 4:254.
48. Lu J, et al. (2013) Endothelial cells promote the colorectal cancer stem cell phenotype through a soluble form of Jagged-1. Cancer Cell 23(2):171-185.
49. Johnston DA, Dong B, Hughes CCW (2009) TNF induction of jagged-1 in endothelial cells is NFkappaB-dependent. Gene 435(1-2):36-44.
50. LeBon L, Lee TV, Sprinzak D, Jafar-Nejad H, Elowitz MB (2014) Fringe proteins modulate Notch-ligand cis and trans interactions to specify signaling states. eLife 3:e02950.
51. Bentley K, Jones M, Cruys B (2013) Predicting the future: Towards symbiotic computational and experimental angiogenesis research. Exp Cell Res 319(9):1240-1246.
52. Kangsamaksin T, et al. (2015) NOTCH decoys that selectively block DLL/NOTCH or JAG/NOTCH disrupt angiogenesis by unique mechanisms to inhibit tumor growth. Cancer Discov 5(2):182-197.