Student-involved data use: Establishing the evidence base

Journal of Educational Change

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 281-304

  Jimerson, Jo Beth ^a   Reames, Ellen ^b  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Continuous improvement; Data walls; Data driven decision making (DDDM); Educational data use; School improvement; School reform; Student data folders; Student involved data use (SIDU)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937833972     PISSN: 13892843     EISSN: 15731812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10833-015-9246-4     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Baldrige Performance Excellence Program. (2015). 2015–2016 Baldrige excellence framework: A systems approach to improving your organization’s performance (education). Gaithersburg, MD: US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. http://www.nist.gov/baldrige
2. Banister, S. I. (2002). A question of quality: The Malcolm Baldrige criteria as applied to education. Journal of Research for Educational Leaders,1(2), 44–65.
3. Benjamin, S. (2000). The quality rubric: A systematic approach for implementing quality principles and tools in classrooms and schools. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education,5(1), 7–74.
5. Blackwell, L. D., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development,78(1), 246–263.
6. Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal,42(2), 231–268.
7. Burgard, J. J. (2009). Continuous improvement in the science classroom (2nd ed.). Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
8. Byrnes, M. A., & Baxter, J. C. (2012). There is another way! Launch a Baldrige-based quality classroom (2nd ed.). Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
9. Cauley, K. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2010). Formative assessment techniques to support student motivation and achievement. The Clearing House,83(1), 1–6.
10. Chappuis, J. (2009). Seven strategies of assessment for learning (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
11. Chappuis, J., Stiggins, R. J., Chappuis, S., & Arter, J. A. (2012). Classroom assessment for student learning doing it right—Using it well (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
12. Clymer, J. B., & Wiliam, D. (2007). Improv-ing the way we grade science. Educational Leadership,64, 36–42.
13. Coburn, C. E., Honig, M. I., & Stein, M. K. (2009). What’s the evidence on districts’ use of evidence? In J. D. Bransford, D. J. Stipek, N. J. Vye, L. M. Gomez, & D. Lam (Eds.), The role of research in educational improvement (pp. 67–87). Cambridge: Harvard Education Press.
14. Copland, M., Knapp, M., & Swinnerton, J. (2009). Data informed leadership and school improvement. In T. J. Kowalski & T. J. Lasley (Eds.), Handbook on data-based decision making in education (pp. 153–172). New York: Routledge.
15. Courtney, L. (2014). In Pinterest [“Data Binders” board]. Retrieved December 21, 2014 from http://pinterest.com/lianec/data-binders/
16. Daly, A. (2009). Rigid response in an age of accountability: The potential of leadership and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly,45(2), 168–216.
17. Datnow, A., Park, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data: How high-performing school systems use data to improve instruction for elementary students. Retrieved August 13, 2010 from New Schools Venture Fund website: http://www.newschools.org/files/AchievingWithData.pdf
18. Dunlap Community Unit Schools #323 (DCUS). (2013). Continuous improvement. Retrieved September 19, 2013 from http://www.dunlapcusd.net/CI/Pages/StudentDataFolders.aspx
19. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine.
20. Farley-Ripple, E. N., & Cho, V. (2014). Depth of use: How district decision-makers did and did not engage with evidence. In A. Bowers, A. R. Shoho, & B. G. Barnett (Eds.), Using data in schools to inform leadership and decision-making—international research on school leadership (Vol. 5, pp. 229–252). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
21. Flynn, B. B., & Saladin, B. (2001). Further evidence on the validity of the theoretical models underlying the Baldrige criteria. Journal of Operations Management,19, 617–652.
22. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (1995). Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly,40(2), 309–342.
23. Halverson, R. (2010). School formative feedback systems. Peabody Journal of Education,85, 130–146.
24. Hamilton, L. S., Halverson, R., Jackson, S. S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J. A., & Wayman, J. C. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences and the National Center for Education Evaluation.
25. Hattie, J. (2011). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York: Routledge.
26. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research,77(1), 81–112.
27. Heritage, M. (2007). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan,89, 140–145.
28. Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment and next-generation assessment systems: Are we losing an opportunity? Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
29. Hurst-Euless-Bedford Independent School District (HEBISD). (2011). Continuous improvement. Retrieved September 19, 2013 from http://www.hebisd.edu/CI/ci-default.asp
30. Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007). Cutting through the “data-driven” mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. In P. A. Moss (Ed.), Evidence and decision making (pp. 105–131). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
31. Jimerson, J. B. & McGhee, M. (2013). Leading inquiry in schools: Examining mental models of datainformed practice. Current Issues in Education,16(1), 1–20.
32. Jim Shipley & Associates. (2012a). Continuous classroom improvement: First steps in using a systems approach to improve learning results (3rd ed.). North Redington Beach, Florida: Jim Shipley & Associates.
33. Jim Shipley & Associates. (2012b). Doing it right! A guide to student data folders and student-led conferences. North Redington Beach, Florida: Jim Shipley & Associates.
34. Jim Shipley & Associates. (2013). Retrieved October 13, 2013 from www.jimshipley.net
35. Kennedy, B. L., & Datnow, A. (2011). Student involvement and data-driven decision making: Developing a new typology. Youth & Society,43(4), 1246–1271.
36. Kerr, K. I., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education,112, 496–520.
37. Loeb, H., Knapp, M. S., & Elfers, A. M. (2008). Teachers’ response to standards-based reform: Probing reform assumptions in Washington State. Education Policy Analysis Archives,16(8), 1–32.
38. Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., Anderson, S. E., Michlin, M., Mascall, B., et al. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning (final report of research findings). New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
39. Maggin, D. M., Chafouleas, S. M., Goddard, K. M., & Johnson, A. H. (2011). A systematic evaluation of token economies as a classroom management tool for students with challenging behavior. Journal of School Psychology,49, 529–554.
40. Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist,47(2), 71–85.
41. Mandinach, E. B., & Jackson, S. S. (2012). Transforming teaching and learning through data-driven decision making. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
42. Marsh, J. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–48.
43. Marsh, J. A., Farrell, C. C., & Bertrand, M. (2014). Trickle-down accountability: How middle school teachers engage students in data use. Educational Policy. doi:10.1177/0895904814531653
44. Marsh, J. A., McCombs, J. S., & Martorell, F. (2010). How instructional coaches support data-driven decision making: Policy implementation and effects in Florida middle schools. Educational Policy,24(6), 872–907.
45. Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education. RAND. Retrieved December 17, 2012 from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/occasional_papers/2006/RAND_OP170.pdf
46. Martin, B. (2011.) Tutorials-student data folders. Cedar Rapids Community School District (CRCSD). Retrieved September 19, 2013 from http://quality.cr.k12.ia.us/index_search.asp
47. Means, B., Chen, E., DeBarger, A., & Padilla, C. (2011). Teachers’ ability to use data to inform instruction: Challenges and supports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
48. Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology,57, 487–503.
49. Miller, M. N., Bell, E. V., & Holland, D. F. (2009). Slow turn ahead: 5 principles guide district through a changing demographic landscape. Journal of Staff Development,30(4), 46–50.
50. Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS). (2010). Data notebooks/folders. Retrieved September 20, 2013 from http://montgomeryschoolsmd.org/info/baldrige/staff/datanotebooks.shtm
51. Neves, J. S., & Nakhai, B. (1993). The Baldrige award framework for teaching total quality management. Journal of Education for Business,69(2), 121–125.
52. Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2009). Co-constructing distributed leadership: District and school connections in data-driven decision-making. School Leadership and Management,29(5), 477–494.
53. Park, S., Hironaka, S., Carver, P., & Nordstrum, L. (2013). Continuous improvement in education. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
54. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology,95(4), 667–686.
55. Plank, S. B., & Condliffe, B. F. (2013). Pressures of the season: An examination of classroom quality and high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal,50(5), 1152–1182.
56. Pollock, M. (2013). It takes a network to raise a child—Improving the communication infrastructure of public education. Teachers College Record,115(7), 1–28.
57. Quebodeaux, P. S. (2010). Quality in education in the Calcasieu Parish school system: Experiences of administrators. Dissertation, University of New Orleans.
58. Reeves, D. B., & Flach, T. (2011). Data: Meaningful analysis can rescue schools from drowning in data. Journal of Staff Development,32(4), 34–40.
59. Rhim, L. M. (2011). Learning how to dance in the Queen City: Cincinnati Public Schools’ turnaround initiative. Darden/Curry Partnership for Leaders in Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. Retrieved August 19, 2013 from http://www.darden.virginia.edu/web/uploadedFiles/Darden/Darden_Curry_PLE/UVA_School_Turnaround/DanceInTheQueenCity_Sept2011.pdf
60. Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization (Rev). New York: Currency Doubleday.
61. Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., & Dutton, J. (2012). Schools that learn (updated and revised): A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Crown Publishing.
62. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research,78(1), 153–189.
63. Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children,31, 351–380.
64. Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan,87(4), 324–328.
65. Stuart, S. K., & Rinaldi, C. (2011). Response to intervention for English learners. The Journal of Multiculturalism in Education,7(3), 1–16.
66. Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Lewis, T. J., Nelson, C. M., et al. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,2(3), 131–143.
67. Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal,44(3), 519–558.
68. Wahlstrom, K. L., Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning. Executive summary of research findings. New York: The Wallace Foundation.
69. Wayman, J. C., & Jimerson, J. B. (2014). Teacher needs for data-related professional learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation,42, 25–34.
70. Wayman, J. C., Spring, S. D., & Lemke, M. A., Lehr, M. D. (2012). Using data to inform practice: Effective principal leadership strategies. Paper presented at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
71. Wayman, J. C., & Stringfield, S. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education,112(August), 549–571.
72. Weaver, T. (1992). Total quality management. ERIC Digest No. 73. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED347670).
73. Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation,37(1), 3–14.