Extracting high confidence protein interactions from affinity purification data: At the crossroads

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 118, Issue , 2015, Pages 63-80

  Pu, Shuye ^a   Vlasblom, James ^a,b   Turinsky, Andrei ^a   Marcon, Edyta ^b   Phanse, Sadhna ^b   Trimble, Sandra Smiley ^b   Olsen, Jonathan ^b   Greenblatt, Jack ^b   Emili, Andrew ^b   Wodak, Shoshana J ^a,b,c  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Affinity purification; Mass spectrometry; Protein protein interaction; Scoring methods

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; PROTEIN DATABASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84937762745     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aebersold R., Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003, 422:198-207.
2. Nilsson T., Mann M., Aebersold R., Yates J.R., Bairoch A., Bergeron J.J. Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time. Nat Methods 2010, 7:681-685.
3. Puig O., Caspary F., Rigaut G., Rutz B., Bouveret E., Bragado-Nilsson E., et al. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 2001, 24:218-229.
4. Rigaut G., Shevchenko A., Rutz B., Wilm M., Mann M., Seraphin B. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat Biotechnol 1999, 17:1030-1032.
5. Walther T.C., Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics in cell biology. J Cell Biol 2010, 190:491-500.
6. Kumar C., Mann M. Bioinformatics analysis of mass spectrometry-based proteomics data sets. FEBS Lett 2009, 583:1703-1712.
7. Wodak S.J., Pu S., Vlasblom J., Seraphin B. Challenges and rewards of interaction proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:3-18.
8. Choi H., Larsen B., Lin Z.Y., Breitkreutz A., Mellacheruvu D., Fermin D., et al. SAINT: probabilistic scoring of affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods 2011, 8:70-73.
9. Collins S.R., Kemmeren P., Zhao X.C., Greenblatt J.F., Spencer F., Holstege F.C., et al. Toward a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:439-450.
10. Guruharsha K.G., Rual J.F., Zhai B., Mintseris J., Vaidya P., Vaidya N., et al. A protein complex network of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 2011, 147:690-703.
11. Hart G.T., Lee I., Marcotte E.R. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality. BMC Bioinforma 2007, 8:236.
12. Sowa M.E., Bennett E.J., Gygi S.P., Harper J.W. Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell 2009, 138:389-403.
13. Zhang B., Park B.H., Karpinets T., Samatova N.F. From pull-down data to protein interaction networks and complexes with biological relevance. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:979-986.
14. Armean I.M., Lilley K.S., Trotter M.W. Popular computational methods to assess multiprotein complexes derived from label-free affinity purification and mass spectrometry (AP-MS) experiments. Mol Cell Proteomics 2013, 12:1-13.
15. Liu H., Sadygov R.G., Yates J.R. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal Chem 2004, 76:4193-4201.
16. Barton S.J., Whittaker J.C. Review of factors that influence the abundance of ions produced in a tandem mass spectrometer and statistical methods for discovering these factors. Mass Spectrom Rev 2009, 28:177-187.
17. Jager S., Cimermancic P., Gulbahce N., Johnson J.R., McGovern K.E., Clarke S.C., et al. Global landscape of HIV-human protein complexes. Nature 2012, 481:365-370.
18. Lavallee-Adam M., Cloutier P., Coulombe B., Blanchette M. Modeling contaminants in AP-MS/MS experiments. J Proteome Res 2011, 10:886-895.
19. Gavin A.C., Aloy P., Grandi P., Krause R., Boesche M., Marzioch M., et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 2006, 440:631-636.
20. Schelhorn S.E., Mestre J., Albrecht M., Zotenko E. Inferring physical protein contacts from large-scale purification data of protein complexes. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011, 10. [M110 004929].
21. Yu X., Ivanic J., Wallqvist A., Reifman J. A novel scoring approach for protein co-purification data reveals high interaction specificity. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000515.
22. Turner B., Razick S., Turinsky A.L., Vlasblom J., Crowdy E.K., Cho E., et al. iRefWeb: interactive analysis of consolidated protein interaction data and their supporting evidence. Database (Oxford) 2010, 2010:baq023.
23. Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J.M., et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000, 25:25-29.
24. Goll J., Uetz P. The elusive yeast interactome. Genome Biol 2006, 7:223.
25. Jensen L.J., Biochemistry Bork P. Not comparable, but complementary. Science 2008, 322:56-57.
26. Yu H., Braun P., Yildirim M.A., Lemmens I., Venkatesan K., Sahalie J., et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 2008, 322:104-110.
27. Ivanic J., Yu X., Wallqvist A., Reifman J. Influence of protein abundance on high-throughput protein-protein interaction detection. PLoS One 2009, 4:e5815.
28. Wodak S.J., Vlasblom J., Turinsky A.L., Pu S. Protein-protein interaction networks: the puzzling riches. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013, 23:941-953.
29. Babu M., Vlasblom J., Pu S., Guo X., Graham C., Bean B.D., et al. Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2012, 489:585-589.
30. Behrends C., Sowa M.E., Gygi S.P., Harper J.W. Network organization of the human autophagy system. Nature 2010, 466:68-76.
31. Breitkreutz A., Choi H., Sharom J.R., Boucher L., Neduva V., Larsen B., et al. A global protein kinase and phosphatase interaction network in yeast. Science 2010, 328:1043-1046.
32. Wang M., Weiss M., Simonovic M., Haertinger G., Schrimpf S.P., Hengartner M.O., et al. PaxDb, a database of protein abundance averages across all three domains of life. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012, 11:492-500.
33. Ni Z., Olsen J.B., Emili A., Greenblatt J.F. Identification of mammalian protein complexes by lentiviral-based affinity purification and mass spectrometry. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 781:31-45.
34. Skarra D.V., Goudreault M., Choi H., Mullin M., Nesvizhskii A.I., Gingras A.C., et al. Label-free quantitative proteomics and SAINT analysis enable interactome mapping for the human Ser/Thr protein phosphatase 5. Proteomics 2011, 11:1508-1516.
35. Teo G., Liu G., Zhang J., Nesvizhskii A.I., Gingras A.C., Choi H. SAINTexpress: improvements and additional features in Significance Analysis of INTeractome software. J Proteomics 2014, 100:37-43.
36. Christianson J.C., Olzmann J.A., Shaler T.A., Sowa M.E., Bennett E.J., Richter C.M., et al. Defining human ERAD networks through an integrative mapping strategy. Nat Cell Biol 2012, 14:93-105.
37. Ceol A., Chatr Aryamontri A., Licata L., Peluso D., Briganti L., Perfetto L., et al. MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D532-D539.
38. Krogan N.J., Cagney G., Yu H., Zhong G., Guo X., Ignatchenko A., et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2006, 440:637-643.
39. Wang J.Z., Du Z., Payattakool R., Yu P.S., Chen C.F. A new method to measure the semantic similarity of GO terms. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1274-1281.
40. Yu G., Li F., Qin Y., Bo X., Wu Y., Wang S. GOSemSim: an R package for measuring semantic similarity among GO terms and gene products. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:976-978.
41. Marcon E., Ni Z., Pu S., Turinsky A., Trimble S.S., Phanse S., et al. Protein interactions for the human chromatin-related proteins identify a demethylase complex required for chromosome segregation. Cell Rep. 2014, 8:297-310.
42. Qiu J., Noble W.S. Predicting co-complexed protein pairs from heterogeneous data. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4:e1000054.
43. Wodak S.J., Vlasblom J., Pu S. High-throughput analyses and curation of protein interactions in yeast. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 759:381-406.
44. Levy E.D., Pereira-Leal J.B. Evolution and dynamics of protein interactions and networks. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008, 18:349-357.
45. Ghaemmaghami S., Huh W.K., Bower K., Howson R.W., Belle A., Dephoure N., et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 2003, 425:737-741.
46. Landry C.R., Levy E.D., Michnick S.W. Weak functional constraints on phosphoproteomes. Trends Genet 2009, 25:193-197.
47. Levy E.D., Michnick S.W., Landry C.R. Protein abundance is key to distinguish promiscuous from functional phosphorylation based on evolutionary information. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2012, 367:2594-2606.
48. Lee S.W., Berger S.J., Martinovic S., Pasa-Tolic L., Anderson G.A., Shen Y., et al. Direct mass spectrometric analysis of intact proteins of the yeast large ribosomal subunit using capillary LC/FTICR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:5942-5947.
49. Mellacheruvu D., Wright Z., Couzens A.L., Lambert J.P., St-Denis N.A., Li T., et al. The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Methods 2013, 10:730-736.
50. Turinsky A.L., Razick S., Turner B., Donaldson I.M., Wodak S.J. Interaction databases on the same page. Nat Biotechnol 2011, 29:391-393.
51. Venkatesan K., Rual J.F., Vazquez A., Stelzl U., Lemmens I., Hirozane-Kishikawa T., et al. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods 2009, 6:83-90.
52. Braun P., Tasan M., Dreze M., Barrios-Rodiles M., Lemmens I., Yu H., et al. An experimentally derived confidence score for binary protein-protein interactions. Nat Methods 2009, 6:91-97.
53. Smits A.H., Jansen P.W., Poser I., Hyman A.A., Vermeulen M. Stoichiometry of chromatin-associated protein complexes revealed by label-free quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2013, 41:e28.
54. Levy E.D., Landry C.R., Michnick S.W. How perfect can protein interactomes be?. Sci Signal 2009, 2:pe11.
55. Bandyopadhyay S., Mehta M., Kuo D., Sung M.K., Chuang R., Jaehnig E.J., et al. Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage. Science 2010, 330:1385-1389.
56. Guenole A., Srivas R., Vreeken K., Wang Z.Z., Wang S., Krogan N.J., et al. Dissection of DNA damage responses using multiconditional genetic interaction maps. Mol Cell 2013, 49:346-358.
57. Ideker T., Krogan N.J. Differential network biology. Mol Syst Biol 2012, 8:565.