Review of factors that influence the abundance of ions produced in a tandem mass spectrometer and statistical methods for discovering these factors

Mass Spectrometry Reviews

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 177-187

  Barton, Sheila J ^a   Whittaker, John C ^b  

^a SOUTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Abundance of fragment ions; Amino acid sequence; Fragmentation of peptides; Prediction; Statistical models; Tandem mass spectra

Indexed keywords

AMINATION; AMINO ACIDS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; IONS; MASS SPECTROMETERS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; ORGANIC ACIDS; PEPTIDES; PROTEINS; SPECTROMETERS; SPECTROMETRY; STATISTICS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

ABUNDANCE OF FRAGMENT IONS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; FRAGMENTATION OF PEPTIDES; PREDICTION; STATISTICAL MODELS; TANDEM MASS SPECTRA;

AMINES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 59149100438     PISSN: 02777037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mas.20188     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aebersold R, Goodlett DR. 2001. Mass spectrometry in proteomics. Chem Rev 101(2):269-295.
2. Aebersold R, Mann M. 2003. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422(6928):198-207.
3. Arnold RJ, Jayasankar N, Aggarwal D, Tang H, Radivojac P. 2006. A machine learning approach to predicting peptide fragmentation spectra. Pac Symp Biocomput:219-230.
4. Barton SJ, Richardson S, Perkins DN, Bellahn I, Bryant TN, Whittaker JC. 2007. Using statistical models to identify factors that have a role in defining the abundance of ions produced by tandem MS. Anal Chem 79(15):5601.-5607.
5. Biemann K. 1988. Contributions of mass spectrometry to peptide and protein structure. Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom 16(1-12):99-111.
6. Breci LA, Tabb DL, Yates JR III, Wysocki VH. 2003. Cleavage N-terminal to proline: Analysis of a database of peptide tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem 75(9):1963-1971.
7. Davison AC, Hinkley DV. 1997. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Dongre AR, Somogyi A, Wysocki VH. 1996. Surface-induced dissociation: An effective tool to probe structure, energetics and fragmentation mechanisms of protonated peptides. J Mass Spectrom 31(4):339-350.
9. Edman P. 1950. Method for the determination of the amino acid sequence in peptides. Acta Chem Scand 4:283.
10. Edman P. 1959. Chemistry of amino acids and peptides. Annu Rev Biochem. 28:69-96.
11. Elias JE, Gibbons FD, King OD, Roth FP, Gygi SP. 2004. Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat Biotechnol 22(2):214-219.
12. Eng JK, McCormack AL, Yates JR. 1994. An approach to correlate tandem mass-spectral data of peptides with amino-acid-sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 5(11):976-989.
13. Gu C, Tsaprailis G, Breci L, Wysocki VH. 2000. Selective gas-phase cleavage at the peptide bond C-terminal to aspartic acid in fixed-charge derivatives of Asp-containing peptides. Anal Chem 72(23):5804-5813.
14. Hanash S. 2003. Disease proteomics. Nature 422(6928):226-232.
15. Huang Y, Triscan JM, Pasa-Tolic L, Anderson GA, Lipton MS, Smith RD, Wysocki VH. 2004. Dissociation behavior of doubly-charged tryptic peptides: Correlation of gas-phase cleavage abundance with ramachandran plots. J Am Chem Soc 126(10):3034-3035.
16. Huang Y, Triscari JM, Tseng GC, Pasa-Tolic L, Lipton MS, Smith RD, Wysocki VH. 2005. Statistical characterization of the charge state and residue dependence of low-energy CID peptide dissociation patterns. Anal Chem. 77(18):5800-5813.
17. Huang Y, Wysocki VH, Tabb DL, Yates JR III. 2002. The influence of histidine on cleavage C-terminal to acidic residues in doubly protonated tryptic peptides. Int J Mass Spectrom 219:233-244.
18. Johnson RS, Martin SA, Biemann K, Stults JT, Watson JT. 1987. Novel fragmentation process of peptides by collision-induced decomposition in a tandem mass spectrometer: Differentiation of leucine and isoleucine. Anal Chem 59(21):2621-2625.
19. Kapp EA, Schutz F, Reid GE, Eddes JS, Moritz RL, O'Hair RA, Speed TP, Simpson RJ. 2003. Mining a tandem mass spectrometry database to determine the trends and global, factors influencing peptide fragmentation. Anal. Chem.75(22):6251-6264.
20. Khatun J, Ramkissoon K, Giddings MC. 2007. Fragmentation characteristics of collision-induced dissociation in MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 79(8):3032-3040.
21. Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. 1999. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20(18):3551.-3567.
22. Phizicky E, Bastiaens PI, Zhu H, Snyder M, Fields S. 2003. Protein analysis on a proteomic scale. Nature 422(6928):208-215.
23. Polce MJ, Ren D, Wesdemiotis C. 2000. Dissociation of the peptide bond in protonated peptides. J Mass Spectrom 35(12):1391-1398.
24. Roepstorff P, Fohlman J. 1984. Proposal for a common nomenclature for sequence ions in mass spectra of peptides. Biomed Mass Spectrom 11(11):601.
25. Sali A, Glaeser R, Earnest T, Baumeister W. 2003. From words to literature in structural proteomics. Nature 422(6928):216-225.
26. Savitski MM, Kjeldsen F, Nielsen ML, Zubarev RA. 2007. Relative specificities of water and ammonia losses from, backbone fragments in collision-activated dissociation. J Proteome Res 6(7):2669-2673.
27. Schutz F, Kapp EA, Simpson RJ, Speed TP. 2003. Deriving statistical models for predicting peptide MS product ion intensities. Biochem Soc Trans 31(Part 6):1479-1483, 1-9-2003. Ref Type: Magazine Article.
28. Stone C, Hansen M, Kooperburg C, Truong Y. 1997. Polynomial splines and their products (with discussion). Ann Stat 25(4):1371-1470.
29. Tabb DL, Huang Y, Wysocki VH, Yates JR III. 2004. Influence of basic residue content on fragment ion peak intensities in low-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides. Anal Chem 76(5):1243-1248.
30. Tabb DL, Smith LL, Breci LA, Wysocki VH, Lin D, Yates JR III. 2003. Statistical characterization of ion trap tandem mass spectra from doubly charged tryptic peptides. Anal Chem. 75(5):1155-1163.
31. Tang XJ, Thibault P, Boyd RK. 1.993. Fragmentation reactions of multiply-protonated peptides and implications for sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry with low-energy collision-induced dissociation. Anal Chem 65(20):2824-2834.
32. Tsaprailis G, Nair H, Zhong W, Kuppannan K, Futrell JH, Wysocki VH. 2004. A mechanistic investigation of the enhanced cleavage at histidine in the gas-phase dissociation of protonated peptides. Anal Chem. 76(7):2083-2094.
33. Tyers M, Mann M. 2003. From genomics to proteomics. Nature 422(6928):193-197.
34. Vaisar T, Urban J. 1996. Probing the proline effect in CID of protonated peptides. J Mass Spectrom. 31(10):1185-1187.
35. Wilm M, Shevchenko A, Houthaeve T, Breit S, Schweigerer L, Fotsis T, Mann M. 1996. Femtomole sequencing of proteins from polyacrylamide gels by nano-electrospray mass spectrometry. Nature 379(6564):466-469.
36. Wysocki VH, Resing KA, Zhang Q, Cheng G. 2005. Mass spectrometry of peptides and proteins. Methods 35(3):211-222.
37. Wysocki VH, Tsaprailis G, Smith LL, Breci LA. 2000. Mobile and localized protons: A framework for understanding peptide dissociation. J Mass Spectrom 35(12):1399-1406.
38. Zhang Z. 2004. Prediction of low-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides. Anal. Chem. 76(14):3908-3922.
39. Zhang Z. 2005. Prediction of low-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides with three or more charges. Anal Chem 77(19):6364-6373.
40. Zhu H, Bilgin M, Snyder M. 2003. Proteomics. Annu Rev Biochem 72:783-812.