Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous noninvasive cardiac output measurement: A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients after cardiothoracic surgery

Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1423-1428

  Wagner, Julia Y ^a   Sarwari, Harun ^a   Schön, Gerhard ^a   Kubik, Mathias ^a,b   Kluge, Stefan ^a   Reichenspurner, Hermann ^b   Reuter, Daniel A ^a   Saugel, Bernd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HEART CENTER HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

cardiac output; critical care; hemodynamic monitoring; pulmonary artery catheter; T Line

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AGED; APPLANATION TONOMETER; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMITTENT PULMONARY ARTERY THERMODILUTION; LUNG ARTERY PRESSURE; LUNG TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; RADIAL ARTERY APPLANATION TONOMETRY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; THERMODILUTION; THORAX SURGERY; TONOMETRY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HUMANS; MANOMETRY; METHODS; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULMONARY ARTERY; RADIAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

AGED; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULMONARY ARTERY; RADIAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 84937611760     PISSN: 00903493     EISSN: 15300293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000979     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gurgel ST, do Nascimento P Jr: Maintaining tissue perfusion in highrisk surgical patients: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Anesth Analg 2011; 112:1384-1391
2. Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and metaanalysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2011; 112:1392-1402
3. Ganz W, Donoso R, Marcus HS, et al. A new technique for measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution in man. Am J Cardiol 1971; 27:392-396
4. Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, et al. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-Tipped catheter. N Engl J Med 1970; 283:447-451
5. Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al. The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA 1996; 276:889-897
6. Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF, et al. Canadian Critical Care Clinical Trials Group: A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonaryartery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:5-14
7. Richard C, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in 2011. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011; 17:296-302
8. Rajaram SS, Desai NK, Kalra A, et al. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2:CD003408
9. Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:887-897
10. Marik PE. Noninvasive cardiac output monitors: A state-of the-Art review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013; 27:121-134
11. Appel PL, Kram HB, Mackabee J, et al. Comparison of measurements of cardiac output by bioimpedance and thermodilution in severely ill surgical patients. Crit Care Med 1986; 14:933-935
12. Saugel B, Meidert AS, Langwieser N, et al. An autocalibrating algorithm for non-invasive cardiac output determination based on the analysis of an arterial pressure waveform recorded with radial artery applanation tonometry: A proof of concept pilot analysis. J Clin Monit Comput 2014; 28:357-362
13. Bubenek-Turconi SI, Craciun M, Miclea I, et al. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output by the Nexfin before and after preload-modifying maneuvers: A comparison with intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2013; 117:366-372
14. de Waal EE, Wappler F, Buhre WF. Cardiac output monitoring. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22:71-77
15. Janelle GM, Gravenstein N. An accuracy evaluation of the T-Line Tensymeter (continuous noninvasive blood pressure management device) versus conventional invasive radial artery monitoring in surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2006; 102:484-490
16. Szmuk P, Pivalizza E, Warters RD, et al. An evaluation of the T-Line Tensymeter continuous noninvasive blood pressure device during induced hypotension. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:307-312
17. Saugel B, Fassio F, Hapfelmeier A, et al. The T-Line TL-200 system for continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement in medical intensive care unit patients. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38:1471-1477
18. Meidert AS, Huber W, Hapfelmeier A, et al. Evaluation of the radial artery applanation tonometry technology for continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring compared with central aortic blood pressure measurements in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. J Crit Care 2013; 28:908-912
19. Saugel B, Meidert AS, Hapfelmeier A, et al. Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure measurement based on radial artery tonometry in the intensive care unit: A method comparison study using the T-Line TL-200pro device. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111:185-190
20. Meidert AS, Huber W, Muller JN, et al. Radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients: Comparison with invasively assessed radial arterial pressure. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112:521-528
21. Dueck R, Goedje O, Clopton P. Noninvasive continuous beat-To-beat radial artery pressure via TL-200 applanation tonometry. J Clin Monit Comput 2012; 26:75-83
22. Saugel B, Dueck R, Wagner JY. Measurement of blood pressure. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2014; 28:309-322
23. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006; 34:1402-1407
24. Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A. What is a fluid challenge? Curr Opin Crit Care 2011; 17:290-295
25. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat 2007; 17:571-582
26. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-Analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15:85-91
27. Critchley LA, Lee A, Ho AM. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output. Anesth Analg 2010; 111:1180-1192
28. Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, et al. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring-A consensus of 16. Crit Care 2011; 15:229
29. Saugel B, Reuter DA. Are we ready for the age of non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring? Br J Anaesth 2014; 113:340-343
30. Nowak RM, Sen A, Garcia AJ, et al. Noninvasive continuous or intermittent blood pressure and heart rate patient monitoring in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 2011; 29:782-789
31. Wagner JY, Prantner JS, Meidert AS, et al. Noninvasive continuous versus intermittent arterial pressure monitoring: Evaluation of the vascular unloading technique (CNAP device) in the emergency department. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2014; 22:8
32. Benes J, Simanova A, Tovarnicka T, et al. Continuous non-invasive monitoring improves blood pressure stability in upright position: Randomized controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput 2015; 29:11-17
33. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: A meta-Analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010; 113:1220-1235
34. Wagner JY, Saugel B. When should we adopt continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies into clinical routine? J Clin Monit Comput 2015; 29:1-3
35. Penaz J, Voigt A, Teichmann W. Contribution to the continuous indirect blood pressure measurement. Z Gesamte Inn Med 1976; 31:1030-1033
36. Bogert LW, Wesseling KH, Schraa O, et al. Pulse contour cardiac output derived from non-invasive arterial pressure in cardiovascular disease. Anaesthesia 2010; 65:1119-1125
37. Bein B, Renner J, Scholz J, et al. Comparing different methods of cardiac output determination: A call for consensus. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23:710
38. Smetkin AA, Hussain A, Kuzkov VV, et al. Validation of cardiac output monitoring based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis vs transpulmonary thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Br J Anaesth 2014; 112:1024-1031
39. Pratt B, Roteliuk L, Hatib F, et al. Calculating arterial pressure-based cardiac output using a novel measurement and analysis method. Biomed Instrum Technol 2007; 41:403-411
40. Monnet X, Vaquer S, Anguel N, et al. Comparison of pulse contour analysis by Pulsioflex and Vigileo to measure and track changes of cardiac output in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2014; 114:235-243