Electroporation-based applications in biotechnology

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 480-488

  Kotnik, Tadej ^a   Frey, Wolfgang ^b   Sack, Martin ^b   Haberl Meglič, Saša ^a   Peterka, Matjaž ^c   Miklavčič, Damijan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c Centre of Excellence for Biosensors   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICROBIOLOGY; MICROORGANISMS;

BIOTECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS; CHIP SCALE; ELECTROPORATION; ELECTROTRANSFORMATION; FUTURE PERSPECTIVES; GENETIC MODIFICATIONS; INACTIVATION OF MICROORGANISMS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

DNA; PLASMID DNA;

ADAPTATION; BACTERIUM; BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELL MEMBRANE; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRODE; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ELECTROPORATION; ELECTROTRANSFORMATION; FOOD PRESERVATION; GENETIC TRANSFORMATION; GRAPE; LIPID BILAYER; MICROALGA; MICROFLUIDICS; MICROORGANISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULE; NONHUMAN; PASTEURIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SUGAR BEET; THERMODYNAMICS; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; YEAST;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; ELECTROPORATION;

EID: 84937519255     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.002     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Stämpfli R. Reversible electrical breakdown of the excitable membrane of a Ranvier node. Ann. Acad. Bras. Cien. 1958, 30:57-63.
2. Sale A.J.H., et al. Effects of high electric fields on microorganisms. I. Killing of bacteria and yeasts. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1967, 148:781-788.
3. Benz R., et al. Reversible electrical breakdown of lipid bilayer membranes: a charge-pulse relaxation study. J. Membr. Biol. 1979, 48:181-204.
4. Teissié J., Tsong T. Electric field induced transient pores in phospholipid bilayer vesicles. Biochemistry 1981, 20:1548-1554.
5. Weaver J.C., Chizmadzhev Y.A. Theory of electroporation: a review. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1996, 41:135-160.
6. Bennett W.F.D., et al. Atomistic simulations of pore formation and closure in lipid bilayers. Biophys. J. 2014, 106:210-219.
7. Sugar I.P., Neumann E. Stochastic model for electric field-induced membrane pores: electroporation. Biophys. Chem. 1984, 19:211-225.
8. Kotnik T., et al. Induced transmembrane voltage and its correlation with electroporation-mediated molecular transport. J. Membr. Biol. 2010, 236:3-13.
9. Flickinger B., et al. Transmembrane potential measurements on plant cells using the voltage-sensitive dye ANNINE-6. Protoplasma 2010, 247:3-12.
10. Yarmush M.L., et al. Electroporation-based technologies for medicine: principles, applications, and challenges. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 16:295-320.
11. Pucihar G., et al. The influence of medium conductivity on electropermeabilization and survival of cells in vitro. Bioelectrochemistry 2001, 54:107-115.
12. Baldwin W.H., et al. Membrane permeability and cell survival after nanosecond pulsed-electric-field exposure-significance of exposure-media composition. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2010, 38:2948-2953.
13. Kramar P., et al. Determination of the lipid bilayer breakdown voltage by means of linear rising signal. Bioelectrochemistry 2007, 70:23-27.
14. Pucihar G., et al. Equivalent pulse parameters for electroporation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 58:3279-3288.
15. Spugnini E.P., et al. Ultrastructural modifications of cell membranes induced by electroporation on melanoma xenografts. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2007, 70:1041-1050.
16. Yeo S.K., Liong M.T. Effect of electroporation on viability and bioconversion of isoflavones in mannitol-soymilk fermented by lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 93:396-409.
17. Miklavčič D., et al. A validated model of in vivo electric field distribution in tissues for electrochemotherapy and for DNA electrotransfer for gene therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1523:73-83.
18. Dymek M., et al. Modeling electroporation of the non-treated and vacuum impregnated heterogeneous tissue of spinach leaves. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2015, 29:55-64.
19. Pavliha D., et al. Planning of electroporation-based treatments using web-based treatment-planning software. J. Membr. Biol. 2013, 246:833-842.
20. Kranjc M., et al. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography for measuring electrical conductivity during electroporation. Physiol. Meas. 2014, 35:985-996.
21. Cukjati D., et al. Real time electroporation control for accurate and safe in vivo non-viral gene therapy. Bioelectrochemistry 2007, 70:501-507.
22. Aune T.E.V., Aachmann F.L. Methodologies to increase the transformation efficiencies and the range of bacteria that can be transformed. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85:1301-1313.
23. Lucas S., et al. Construction of a shuttle vector for, and spheroplast transformation of, the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus abyssi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68:5528-5536.
24. Polak A., et al. Electroporation of archaeal lipid membranes using MD simulations. Bioelectrochemistry 2014, 100:18-26.
25. Panov P.V., et al. Isoprenoid lipid chains increase membrane resistance to pore formation. Biochem. (Moscow) Membr. Cell Biol. 2014, 8(Suppl. A):304-308.
26. Faber K.N., et al. Review: methylotrophic yeasts as factories for production of foreign proteins. Yeast 1995, 11:1331-1344.
27. Brim H., et al. Engineering Deinococcus geothermalis for bioremediation of high-temperature radioactive waste environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69:4575-4582.
28. Li C., et al. The spirochete FlaA periplasmic flagellar sheath protein impacts flagellar helicity. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182:6698-6706.
29. Miller J.F. Bacterial transformation by electroporation. Method Enzymol. 1994, 235:375-385.
30. Fournet-Fayard S., et al. Transformation of wild type Klebsiella pneumoniae with plasmid DNA by electroporation. J. Microbiol. Meth. 1995, 24:49-54.
31. Dzul S.P., et al. Contribution of the Klebsiella pneumoniae capsule to bacterial aggregate and biofilm microstructures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77:1777-1782.
32. Kimoto H., Taketo A. Studies on electrotransfer of DNA into Escherichia coli: effect of molecular form of DNA. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1307:325-330.
33. Dower W.J., et al. High efficiency transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16:6127-6145.
34. Xie T.D., et al. Study of mechanisms of electric field-induced DNA transfection. I. DNA entry by surface binding and diffusion through membrane pores. Biophys. J. 1990, 58:13-19.
35. Antonov P., et al. Heat-shock and osmotically dependent steps by DNA uptake after Escherichia coli electroporation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1993, 1216:286-288.
36. Meddeb-Mouelhi F., et al. High transformation efficiency of Bacillus subtilis with integrative DNA using glycine betaine as osmoprotectant. Anal. Biochem. 2012, 424:127-129.
37. Thompson J.R., et al. An improved protocol for the preparation of yeast cells for transformation by electroporation. Yeast 1998, 14:565-571.
38. Suga M., Hatekayama T. High efficiency transformation of Schizosaccharomyces pombe pretreated with thiol compounds by electroporation. Yeast 2001, 18:1015-1021.
39. Saldana G., et al. Microbiological aspects related to the feasibility of PEF technology for food pasteurization. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54:1415-1426.
40. World Health Organization Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance 2014, World Health Organization.
41. Rieder A., et al. Molecular monitoring of inactivation efficiencies of bacteria during pulsed electric field treatment of clinical wastewater. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 105:2035-2045.
42. Gusbeth C., et al. Critical comparison between the pulsed electric field and thermal decontamination methods of hospital wastewater. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2009, 115:1092-1094.
43. Gusbeth C., et al. Pulsed electric field treatment for bacteria reduction and its impact on hospital wastewater. Chemosphere 2009, 75:228-233.
44. Mahnič-Kalamiza S., Vorobiev E. Electroporation in food processing and biorefinery. J. Membr. Biol. 2014, 247:1279-1304.
45. Alvarez I., et al. Microbial inactivation by pulsed electric fields. Pulsed Electric Fields Technology for the Food Industry 2006, 97-129. Springer. J. Raso, V. Heinz (Eds.).
46. Toepfl S. Pulsed electric field food treatment: scale up from lab to industrial scale. Proc. Food Sci. 2011, 1:776-779.
47. Saulis G. Electroporation of cell membranes: the fundamental effects of pulsed electric fields in food processing. Food Eng. Rev. 2010, 2:52-73.
48. Reberšek M., et al. Generator and setup for emulating exposures of biological samples to lightning strokes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 62. Published online May 25, 2015. 10.1109/TBME.2015.2437359.
49. Gao Y., et al. Inducible cell lysis systems in microbial production of bio-based chemicals. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97:7121-7129.
50. Summers D., Withers H. Electrotransfer - direct transfer of bacterial plasmid DNA by electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18:2192.
51. Kilbane J.J., Bielaga B.A. Instantaneous gene transfer from donor to recipient microorganisms via electroporation. Biotechniques 1991, 10:354-365.
52. Haberl S., et al. Comparison of alkaline lysis with electroextraction and optimization of electric pulses to extract plasmid DNA from Escherichia coli. J. Membr. Biol. 2013, 246:861-867.
53. Ohshima T., et al. Releasing profiles of gene products from recombinant Escherichia coli in a high-voltage pulsed electric field. Biochem. Eng. J. 2000, 5:149-155.
54. Sheng J., et al. Disruption of Synechocystis PCC 6803 for lipid extraction. Water Sci. Technol. 2012, 65:567-573.
55. Vanthoor-Koopmans M., et al. Biorefinery of microalgae for food and fuel. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 135:142-149.
56. Zbinden M.D., et al. Pulsed electric field (PEF) as an intensification pretreatment for greener solvent lipid extraction from microalgae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110:1605-1615.
57. Eing C., et al. Pulsed electric field treatment of microalgae - benefits for microalgae biomass processing. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2013, 41:2901-2907.
58. Flisar K., et al. Testing a prototype pulse generator for a continuous flow system and its use for E. coli inactivation and microalgae lipid extraction. Bioelectrochemistry 2014, 100:44-51.
59. Goettel M., et al. Pulsed electric field assisted extraction of intracellular valuables from microalgae. Algal Res. 2013, 2:401-408.
60. Greenwell H.C., et al. Placing microalgae on the biofuels priority list: a review of the technological challenges. J. R. Soc. Interface 2010, 7:703-726.
61. Wijffels R.H., et al. Microalgae for the production of bulk chemicals and biofuels. Biofuel. Bioprod. Bioref. 2010, 4:287-295.
62. Schenk P.M., et al. Second generation biofuels: high-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. Bioenerg. Res. 2008, 1:20-43.
63. Norsker N.H., et al. Microalgal production - a close look at the economics. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29:24-27.
64. De Boer K., et al. Extraction and conversion pathways for microalgae to biodiesel: a review focused on energy consumption. J. Appl. Phycol. 2012, 24:1681-1698.
65. Bahi M.M., et al. Electroporation and lysis of marine microalga Karenia brevis for RNA extraction and amplification. J. R. Soc. Interface 2011, 8:601-608.
66. Coustets M., et al. Flow process for electroextraction of total proteins from microalgae. J. Membr. Biol. 2013, 246:751-760.
67. Luengo E., et al. Effect of pulsed electric field treatments on permeabilization and extraction of pigments from Chlorella vulgaris. J. Membr. Biol. 2014, 247:1269-1277.
68. Marcil R., Higgins D.R. Direct transfer of plasmid DNA from yeast to E. coli by electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20:917.
69. Ganeva V., Galutzov B. Electropulsation as an alternative method for protein extraction from yeast. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 174:279-284.
70. Suga M., Hatakeyama T. Gene transfer and protein release of fission yeast by application of a high voltage electric pulse. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 394:13-16.
71. Ganeva V., et al. Evidence that pulsed electric field treatment enhances the cell wall porosity of yeast cells. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 172:1540-1552.
72. Sack M., et al. Operation of an electroporation device for grape mash. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2010, 38:1928-1934.
73. Puertolas E., et al. Evolution of polyphenolic compounds in red wine from Cabernet Sauvignon grapes processed by pulsed electric fields during ageing in bottle. Food Chem. 2010, 119:1063-1070.
74. Sack M., et al. Research on industrial-scale electroporation devices fostering the extraction of substances from biological tissue. Food Eng. Rev. 2010, 2:147-156.
75. Sack M., et al. Upgrade of the electroporation device KEA-MOBIL. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2009, 115:1081-1083. Accessible at: przyrbwn.icm.edu.pl/APP/PDF/115/a115z643.pdf.
76. Sack M., et al. Electroporation-assisted dewatering as an alternative method for drying plants. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2008, 36:2577-2585. 10.1109/TPS.2008.2002440.
77. Fox M.B., et al. Electroporation of cells in microfluidic devices. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2006, 385:474-485.
78. Geng T., Lu C. Microfluidic electroporation for cellular analysis and delivery. Lab Chip 2013, 13:3808-3821.
79. Čemažar J., et al. Microfluidic devices for manipulation, modification and characterization of biological cells in electric fields - a review. Inform. MIDEM 2013, 43:143-161.
80. Church C., et al. Integrated electrical concentration and lysis of cells in a microfluidic chip. Biomicrofluidics 2010, 4:44101.
81. Čemažar J., Kotnik T. Dielectrophoretic field-flow fractionation of electroporated cells. Electrophoresis 2012, 33:2867-2874.
82. Scott Mellors J., et al. Integrated microfluidic device for automated single cell analysis using electrophoretic separation and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82:967-973.
83. Qu B., et al. Droplet electroporation in microfluidics for efficient cell transformation with or without cell wall removal. Lab Chip 2012, 12:4483-4488.
84. Meneses N., et al. Impact of insulator shape, flow rate and electrical parameters on inactivation of E. coli using a continuous co-linear PEF system. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2011, 12:6-12.
85. Redondo L.M., et al. Generalized solid-state Marx modulator topology. IEEE Trans. Dielect. El. Insul. 2009, 16:1037-1042.
86. Sack M., et al. Design considerations for a fast stacked-MOSFET switch. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2013, 41:2630-2636.
87. Frey W., et al. Gas-insulated self-breakdown spark gaps: aspects on low-scattering and long-lifetime switching. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2009, 115:1016-1018.
88. Sack M., Müller G. Modular trigger generator for an over-voltage triggered Marx generator. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2012, 40:2618-2624.
89. Sack M., et al. Triggered Marx generators for the industrial-scale electroporation of sugar beets. IEEE Trans. Indust. Appl. 2005, 41:725-733.
90. Reberšek M., et al. Cell membrane electroporation. Part 3. The equipment. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 2014, 30:8-18.
91. Bazhal M., et al. Optimisation of pulsed electric field strength for electroplasmolysis of vegetable tissues. Biosyst. Eng. 2003, 86:339-345.
92. Sack M., Bluhm H. New measurement methods for an industrial scale electroporation faciltity for sugar beets. IEEE Trans. Indust. Appl. 2008, 44:1074-1083.
93. Pliquett U. Bioimpedance: a review for food processing. Food Eng. Rev. 2010, 2:74-94.
94. Pavlin M., et al. Effect of cell electroporation on the conductivity of a cell suspension. Biophys. J. 2005, 88:4378-4390.
95. Jaeger H., et al. Adjustment of milling, mash electroporation and pressing for the development of a PEF assisted juice production in industrial scale. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2012, 14:46-60.
96. Mahnič-Kalamiza S., et al. Dual-porosity model of solute diffusion in biological tissue modified by electroporation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1838:1950-1966.