Creating new interspecific hybrid and polyploid crops

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 436-441

  Mason, Annaliese S ^a   Batley, Jacqueline ^b  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Crop improvement; Hybridisation; Meiotic stability; Polyploidy; Selection; Sequencing

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY;

CROP IMPROVEMENT; HYBRIDISATION; POLYPLOIDY; SELECTION; SEQUENCING;

CROPS;

AGRICULTURE; CROP; CROP IMPROVEMENT; DNA MODIFICATION; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRID; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRIDIZATION; NEW SPECIES; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENOME; POLYPLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW; TRANSGENIC PLANT; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BREEDING; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALIA;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; BREEDING; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; POLYPLOIDY;

EID: 84937518225     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.004     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Moose S.P., Mumm R.H. Molecular plant breeding as the foundation for 21st century crop improvement. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147:969-977.
2. Henry R.J., Nevo E. Exploring natural selection to guide breeding for agriculture. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12:655-662.
3. Collard B.C.Y., Mackill D.J. Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Boil. Sci. 2008, 363:557-572.
4. Micke A., et al. Induced mutations for crop improvement - a review. Trop. Agric. 1987, 64:259-278.
5. Gasser C.S., Fraley R.T. Genetically engineering plants for crop improvement. Science 1989, 244:1293-1299.
6. Edwards D., et al. Accessing complex crop genomes with next-generation sequencing. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126:1-11.
7. Friedt W., et al. Plant breeding: assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants and its exploitation in breeding. Progress in Botany 2007, Vol. 68:151-168. Springer.
8. Cowling W.A. Genetic diversity in Australian canola and implications for crop breeding for changing future environments. Field Crops Res. 2007, 104:103-111.
9. Spielman D., et al. Does inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity decrease disease resistance?. Conserv. Genet. 2004, 5:439-448.
10. Broadening the genetic base of crops: an overview. Broadening the Genetic Base of Crop Production 2001, CABI Publishing, Food and Agriculture Organizsation of the United Nations (FAO), and International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI). H.D. Cooper (Ed.).
11. Ramsey J., Schemske D.W. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998, 29:467-501.
12. McKeown P.C., et al. Emerging molecular mechanisms for biotechnological harnessing of heterosis in crops. Trends Biotechnol. 2013, 31:549-551.
13. Bell G.D.M., et al. RNA-seq analysis of allele-specific expression, hybrid effects, and regulatory divergence in hybrids compared with their parents from natural populations. Genome Biol. Evol. 2013, 5:1309-1323.
14. Fox P.N., et al. Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica 1990, 47:57-64.
15. Lee L.S. Citrus polyploidy - origins and potential for cultivar improvement. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1988, 39:735-747.
16. Topp B.L., et al. Plum. Fruit Breeding: Handbook of Plant Breeding 2012, Vol. 8:571-621. Springer.
17. Alleweldt G., Possingham J.V. Progress in grapevine breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1988, 75:669-673.
18. Bassene J.B., et al. Non-additive phenotypic and transcriptomic inheritance in a citrus allotetraploid somatic hybrid between C. reticulata and C. limon: the case of pulp carotenoid biosynthesis pathway. Plant Cell Rep. 2009, 28:1689-1697.
19. Wood E.A., et al. Resistance of "Gaucho" triticale to Schizaphis graminum. Environ. Entomol. 1974, 3:720-721.
20. Lloyd A.H., et al. Meiotic gene evolution: can you teach a new dog new tricks?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 31:1724-1727.
21. Griffiths S., et al. Molecular characterization of Ph1 as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat. Nature 2006, 439:749-752.
22. Martin A.C., et al. Licensing MLH1 sites for crossover during meiosis. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:4580.
23. Knight E., et al. Inducing chromosome pairing through premature condensation: analysis of wheat interspecific hybrids. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2010, 10:603-608.
24. Hajjar R., Hodgkin T. The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 2007, 156:1-13.
25. Lelley T., Larter E.N. Meiotic regulation in triticale: interaction of the rye genotype and specific wheat chromosomes on meiotic pairing in the hybrid. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 1980, 22:1-6.
26. Matsuzawa Y., et al. Fertility in the intergeneric hybrid plant, Raphanobrassica. Bull. Coll. Agric. Utsunomiya Univ. 1985, 12:31-40.
27. Nishi S. Differentiation of Brassica crops in Asia and the breeding of 'Hakuran', a newly synthesized leafy vegetable. Brassica Crops and Wild Allies 1980, 133-150. Japan Scientific Societies Press. S. Tsunoda (Ed.).
28. Chen S., et al. Trigenomic bridges for Brassica improvement. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 30:524-547.
29. U N. Genome-analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn. J. Bot. 1935, 7:389-452.
30. Liu Z., et al. Mapping PrBn and other quantitative trait loci responsible for the control of homeologous chromosome pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) haploids. Genetics 2006, 174:1583-1596.
31. Jenczewski E., Alix K. From diploids to allopolyploids: the emergence of efficient pairing control genes in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2004, 23:21-45.
32. Cifuentes M., et al. Repeated polyploidy drove different levels of crossover suppression between homoeologous chromosomes in Brassica napus allohaploids. Plant Cell 2010, 22:2265-2276.
33. Grandont L., et al. Homoeologous chromosome sorting and progression of meiotic recombination in Brassica napus: ploidy does matter!. Plant Cell 2014, 26:1448-1463.
34. Jones M.P., et al. Interspecific Oryza sativa L. × O. glaberrima Steud. progenies in upland rice improvement. Euphytica 1997, 94:237-246.
35. Laurie D.A., Bennett M.D. Wheat × maize hybridization. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 1986, 28:313-316.
36. De Storme N., Mason A.S. Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Curr. Plant Biol. 2014, 1:10-33.
37. Liu J.H., et al. Intergeneric somatic hybridization and its application to crop genetic improvement. Plant Cell Tissue Org. 2005, 82:19-44.
38. Fuentes I., et al. Horizontal genome transfer as an asexual path to the formation of new species. Nature 2014, 511:232-235.
39. Lipman M.J., et al. Natural hybrids between Tragopogon mirus and T. miscellus (Asteraceae): a new perspective on karyotypic changes following hybridization at the polyploid level. Am. J. Bot. 2013, 100:2016-2022.
40. Bozza C.G., Pawlowski W.P. The cytogenetics of homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis in plants. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2008, 120:313-319.
41. Leitch A.R., Leitch I.J. Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 2008, 320:481-483.
42. Yant L., et al. Meiotic adaptation to genome duplication in Arabidopsis arenosa. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:2151-2156.
43. Mayer K.F.X., et al. A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome. Science 2014, 345:1251788.
44. Chalhoub B., et al. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 2014, 345:950-953.
45. Szadkowski E., et al. The first meiosis of resynthesized Brassica napus, a genome blender. New Phytol. 2010, 186:102-112.
46. Jiao Y.N., et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 2011, 473:97-100.
47. Varshney R.K., et al. Next-generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27:522-530.
48. Wendler N., et al. Unlocking the secondary gene-pool of barley with next-generation sequencing. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12:1122-1131.
49. Huang X.H., et al. Genomic analysis of hybrid rice varieties reveals numerous superior alleles that contribute to heterosis. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6:6258.
50. Yang H., et al. Sequencing consolidates molecular markers with plant breeding practice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2015, 128:779-795.
51. Weiss-Schneeweiss H., et al. Evolutionary consequences, constraints and potential of polyploidy in plants. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2013, 140:137-150.
52. Lashermes P., et al. Genome rearrangements derived from homoeologous recombination following allopolyploidy speciation in coffee. Plant J. 2014, 78:674-685.
53. Wu Y., et al. Transcriptome shock in an interspecific F1 triploid hybrid of Oryza revealed by RNA sequencing. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2015, Published online June 12, 2015. 10.1111/jipb.12357.
54. Curk F., et al. Next generation haplotyping to decipher nuclear genomic interspecific admixture in Citrus species: analysis of chromosome 2. BMC Genet. 2014, 15:152.
55. Tiwari V.K., et al. SNP Discovery for mapping alien introgressions in wheat. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:273.
56. Ruperao P., et al. A chromosomal genomics approach to assess and validate the desi and kabuli draft chickpea genome assemblies. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12:778-786.
57. Snowdon R. Cytogenetics and genome analysis in Brassica crops. Chromosome Res. 2007, 15:85-95.
58. Louwes K.M., et al. Interspecific hybridization between the cultivated potato Solanum tuberosum subspecies tuberosum L. and the wild species S. circaeifolium subsp. circaeifolium Bitter exhibiting resistance to Phytophthora infestans (Mont) Debary and Globodera pallida (Stone) Behrens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1992, 84:362-370.
59. Jones S.S., et al. Use of alien genes for the development of disease resistance in wheat. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1995, 33:429-443.
60. Zamir D. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2:983-989.