Natural hybrids between Tragopogon mirus and T. miscellus (Asteraceae): A new perspective on karyotypic changes following hybridization at the polyploid level

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2016-2022

  Lipman, Malorie J ^a   Chester, Michael ^a   Soltis, Pamela S ^b   Soltis, Douglas E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allotetraploid; Asteraceae; Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); Three color genomic in situ hybridization (GISH); Tragopogon mirus; Tragopogon miscellus; Trigenomic hybrid

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; DICOTYLEDON; GENOME; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; KARYOTYPE; POLYPLOIDY;

PULLMAN; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

ALLOTETRAPLOIDY; ARTICLE; ASTERACEAE; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; CROSS BREEDING; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH); GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; KARYOTYPE; MITOSIS; PLANT CHROMOSOME; POLYPLOIDY; THREE-COLOR GENOMIC IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (GISH); TRAGOPOGON; TRAGOPOGON MIRUS; TRAGOPOGON MISCELLUS; TRIGENOMIC HYBRID;

ALLOTETRAPLOID; ASTERACEAE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH); THREE-COLOR GENOMIC IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (GISH); TRAGOPOGON MIRUS; TRAGOPOGON MISCELLUS; TRIGENOMIC HYBRID;

ASTERACEAE; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CROSSES, GENETIC; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; KARYOTYPE; MITOSIS; POLYPLOIDY; TRAGOPOGON;

EID: 84885339900     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1300036     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ABBOTT, R. J., M. J. HEGARTY, S. J. H ISCOCK, and A. C. BRENNAN. 2010. Homoploid hybrid speciation in action. Taxon 59: 1375-1386.
2. ALBERT, P. S., Z. GAO, T. V. DANILOVA, and J. A. BIRCHLER. 2010. Diversity of chromosomal karyotypes in maize and its relatives. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 129: 6-16.
3. BIRCHLER, J. A., and R. A. VEITIA. 2007. The gene balance hypothesis: from classical genetics to modern genomics. The Plant Cell 19: 395-402.
4. BIRCHLER, J. A., and R. A. VEITIA. 2012. Gene balance hypothesis: Connec ting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proceed ings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 14746-14753.
5. BRUBAKER, C. L., A. H. PATERSON, and J. F. WENDEL. 1999. Comparative genetic mapping of allotetraploid cotton and its diploid progenitors. Genome 42: 184-203.
6. BUDAHN, H., O. SCHRADER, and H. PETERKA. 2008. Development of a complete set of disomic rape-radish chromosome-addition lines. Euphytica 162: 117-128.
7. CHANG, S.-B., and H. DE JONG. 2005. Production of alien chromosome additions and their utility in plant genetics. Cytogenetics and Plant Breeding 109: 335-343.
8. CHESTER, M., J. P. GALLAGHER, V. V. SYMONDS, A. V. C. DA SILVA, E. V. MAVRODIEV, A. R. LEITCH, P. S. SOLTIS, ET AL. 2012. Extensive chromosomal variation in a recently formed natural allopolyploid species, Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 1176-1181.
9. CHESTER, M., M. J. LIPMAN, J. P. GALLAGHER, P. S. SOLTIS, and D. E. SOLTIS. 2013. An assessment of karyotype restructuring in the neoallotetraploid Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae). Chromosome Research 21: 75-85.
10. CUI, C., X. GE, M. GAUTAM, L. KANG, and Z. LI. 2012. Cytoplasmic and genomic effects on meiotic pairing in Brassica hybrids and allotetraploids from pair crosses of three cultivated diploids. Genetics 191: 725-738.
11. FERGUSON, D., and T. SANG. 2001. Speciation through homoploid hybridization between allotetraploids in peonies (Paeonia). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 3915-3919.
12. GRANT, V. 1981. Plant speciation, 2nd ed., 256-260. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
13. KATO, A., J. C. LAMB, P. S. ALBERT, T. DANILOVA, F. HAN, Z. GAO, S. FINDLEY, ET AL. 2011. Chromosome painting for plant biotechnology. In J. A. Birchler [ed.], Plant chromosome engineering: Methods and protocols, methods in molecular biology, vol. 701. Humana Press, New York, New York, USA.
14. KATO, A., J. C. LAMB, and J. A. BIRCHLER. 2004. Chromosome painting using repetitive DNA sequences as probes for somatic chromosome identifi cation in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101: 13554-13559.
15. KHUSH, G. S. 1973. Cytogenetics of aneuploids. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
16. LAMB, J. C., and J. A. BIRCHLER. 2006. Retroelement genome painting: Cytological visualization of retroelement expansions in the genera Zea and Tripsacum. Genetics 173: 1007-1021.
17. LEITCH, A. R., and I. J. LEITCH. 2008. Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 320: 481-483.
18. LYSAK, M. A., A. PECINKA, and I. SCHUBERT. 2003. Recent progress in chromosome painting of Arabidopsis and related species. Chromosome Research 11: 195-204.
19. MASON, A. S., V. HUTEAU, F. EBER, O. CORITON, G. YAN, M. N. NELSON, W. A. COWLING, ET AL. 2010. Genome structure affects the rate of autosyndesis and allosyndesis in AABC, BBAC and CCAB Brassica interspecifi c hybrids. Chromosome Research 18: 655-666.
20. MAVRODIEV, E. V., M. TANCIG, A. M. SHERWOOD, M. A. GITZENDANNER, J. ROCCA, P. S. SOLTIS, and D. E. SOLTIS. 2005. Phylogeny of Tragopogon L. (Asteraceae) based on internal and external transcribed spacer sequence data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 117-133.
21. MUKAI, Y., and Y. NAKAHARA. 1993. Simultaneous discrimination of the three genomes in hexaploid wheat by multicolor fl uorescence in situ hybridization using total genomic and highly repeated DNA probes. Genome 36: 489-494.
22. NICOLAS, S. D., M. LEFLON, Z. LIU, F. EBER, L. CHELYSHEVA, O. CORITON, A. M. CHEVRE, ET AL. 2008. Chromosome 'speed dating' during meiosis of polyploid Brassica hybrids and haploids. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 120: 331-338.
23. OWNBEY, M. 1950. Natural hybridization and amphiploidy in the genus Tragopogon. American Journal of Botany 37: 487-499.
24. PARKIN, I. A. P., A. G. SHARPE, D. J. KEITH, and D. J. LYDIATE. 1995. Identifi cation of the A and C genomes of amphidiploid Brassica napus (oilseed rape). Genome 38: 1122-1131.
25. PIRES, J. C., K. Y. LIM, A. KOVARIK, R. MATYASEK, A. BOYD, A. R. LEITCH, I. J. LEITCH, ET AL. 2004. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of recently evolved Tragopogon (Asteraceae) allopolyploids reveal a karyotype that is additive of the diploid progenitors. American Journal of Botany 91: 1022-1035.
26. RIESEBERG, L. H. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 359-389.
27. RIESEBERG, L. H. 2001. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 351-358.
28. RIESEBERG, L. H., and S. E. CARNEY. 1998. Plant hybridization. New Phytologist 140: 599-624.
29. RIESEBERG, L. H., and D. A. WARNER. 1987. Electrophoretic evidence for hybridization between Tragopogon mirus and Tragopogon miscellus (Compositae). Systematic Botany 12: 281-285.
30. SEARS, E. R. 1953. Nullisomic analysis in common wheat. American Naturalist 87: 245-252.
31. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, J. C. P IRES, A. K OVARIK, J. A. T ATE, and E. MAVRODIEV. 2004. Recent and recurrent polyploidy in Tragopogon (Asteraceae): cytogenetic, genomic and genetic comparisons. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 485-501.
32. SOLTIS, P. S., and D. E. SOLTIS. 2009. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 60: 561-588.
33. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1981. Mechanisms of speciation-A population genetic approach. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 23-48.
34. XIONG, Z. Y., R. T. GAETA, and J. C. PIRES. 2011. Homoeologous shuffle ing and chromosome compensation maintain genome balance in resynthesized allopolyploid Brassica napus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108: 7908-7913.
35. XIONG, Z. Y., and J. C. PIRES. 2011. Karyotype and identifi cation of all homoeologous chromosomes of allopolyploid Brassica napus and its diploid progenitors. Genetics 187: 37-49.