Molecular descriptors

Handbook of Chemoinformatics Algorithms

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 89-143

  Fechner, Nikolas ^a   Hinselmann, Georg ^a   Wegner, Jörg Kurt ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b Virco BVBA   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937514206     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420082999     Document Type: Chapter

References (104)

1. Todeschini, R. and Consonni, V., Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
2. Cook, D. J. and Holder, L. B. (eds), Mining Graph Data.Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2007.
3. Bush, B. L. and Sheridan, R. P., PATTY: A programmable atom typer and language for automatic classification of atoms in molecular databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1993, 33, 756-762.
4. Leite, T. B., Gomes, D., Miteva, M. A., Chomilier, J., Villoutreix, B. O., and Tuffery, P., Frog: A. FRee online druG 3D conformation generator. Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, 35, 568-572.
5. Izrailev, S., Zhu, F., and Agrafiotis, D. K., A distance geometry heuristic for expanding the range of geometries sampled during conformational search. J. Comput. Chem., 2006, 27, 1962-1969.
6. Gasteiger, J., Sadowski, J., Schuur, J., Selzer, P., Steinhauer, L., and Steinhauer, V., Chemical information in 3D space. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1996, 36, 1030-1037.
7. Schwab, C., Konformative Flexibilitaet von Liganden im Wirkstoffdesign. PhD thesis, Erlangen, Germany, 2001.
8. Good, A. C. and Cheney, D. L., Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols (1): Exploration of ligand conformational sampling techniques. J. Mol. Graphics Model, 2003, 22, 23-30.
9. Bunke, H. and Neuhaus, M., Graph matching-exact and error-tolerant methods and the automatic learning of edit costs. In: Mining Graph Data, pp. 17-34, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2007.
10. Luks, E. M., Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 1982, 25, 42-65.
11. Faulon, J.-L. Stochastic generator of chemical structure, 2. Using simulated annealing to search the space of constitutional isomers. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1996, 36, 731-740.
12. Bonchev, D. and Rouvray, D., Complexity in Chemistry: Introduction and Fundamentals. Taylor & Francis, London and NewYork, 2003.
13. Bonchev, D., Overall connectivities/topological complexities: A new powerful tool for QSPR/QSAR. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2000, 40, 934-941.
14. Minoli, D. Combinatorial graph complexity. Atti. Accad. Naz. Lincei, VIII. Ser., Rend., Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat., 1975, 59, 651-661.
15. Bremser, W. HOSE-a novel substructure code. Anal. Chim. Acta, 1978, 103, 355-365.
16. Hemmer, M. C., Steinhauer, V., and Gasteiger, J., Deriving the 3D structure of organic molecules from their infrared spectra. Vib. Spectrosc., 1999, 19, 151-164.
17. Hemmer, M. C. and Gasteiger, J., Prediction of three-dimensional molecular structures using information from infrared spectra. Anal. Chim. Acta, 2000, 420, 145-154.
18. Fröhlich, H., Wegner, J. K., Sieker, F., and Zell, A., Kernel functions for attributed molecular graphs-a new similarity based approach toADME prediction in classification and regression. QSAR Comb. Sci., 2006, 25, 317-326.
19. Fröhlich, H., Wegner, J. K., and Zell, A., Assignment kernels for chemical compounds. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 2005 (IJCNN’05), 2005, pp. 913-918.
20. Bender, A., Mussa, H. Y., Glen, R. C., and Reiling, S., Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): Evaluation of performance. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2004, 44, 1708-1718.
21. Bender, A., Mussa, H. Y., Glen, R. C., and Reiling, S., Molecular similarity searching using atom environments, information-based feature selection, and a nave bayesian classifier. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2004, 44, 170-178.
22. Gutman, I., Chemical Graph Theory. Introduction and Fundamentals. Abacus Press-Gordon and Breach, NewYork, 1991.
23. Free, S. M. and Wilson, J.W., A mathematical contribution to structure-activity studies. J. Med. Chem., 1964, 7, 395-399.
24. Clark, M., Cramer, R., and van Opdenbosch, N., Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field. J. Comput. Chem., 1989, 10, 982-1012.
25. Meng, E. C. and Lewis, R. A., Determination of molecular topology and atomic hybridization states from heavy atom coordinates. J. Comput. Chem., 1991, 12, 891-898.
26. Schroedinger, Macromodel 9.5 Reference Manual, 2007.
27. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc., 2008, Daylight Theory Manual.
28. Rarey, M. and Dixon, J. S. Feature trees: A new molecular similarity measure based on tree matching. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 1998, 12, 471-490.
29. Carhart, R. E., Smith, D. H., and Venkataraghavan, R., Atom pairs as features in structure- activity studies: Definition and applications. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1985, 25, 64-73.
30. Dijkstra, E. W., A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Num. Math., 1959, 1, 269-271.
31. Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R., and Stein, C., Introduction to Algorithms. MIT Press, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Cambridge, MA, 2001.
32. Borgwardt, K. M., Graph kernels. PhD thesis, 2007, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen.
33. Faulon, J.-L., Visco, D. P., and Pophale, R. S., The signature molecular descriptor. 1. Using extended valence sequences in QSAR and QSPR studies. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2003, 43, 707-720.
34. Faulon, J.-L., Churchwell, C. J., and Visco, D. P. The signature molecular descriptor. 2. enumerating molecules from their extended valence sequences. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2003, 43, 721-734.
35. Churchwell, C. J., Rintoul, M. D., Martin, S., Visco, D. P., Kotu, A., Larson, R. S., Sillerud, L. O., Brown, D. C., and Faulon, J.-L. The signature molecular descriptor. inverse-quantitative structure-activity relationship of ICAM-1 inhibitory peptides. J. Mol. Graphics Model, 2004, 22, 263-273.
36. Faulon, J.-L., Collins, M. J., and Carr, R. D. The signature molecular descriptor. 4. Canonizing molecules using extended valence sequences. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2004, 44, 427-436.
37. Lewell, X. Q., Judd, D. B., Watson, S. P., and Hann, M. M., RECAP-retrosynthetic combinatorial analysis procedure: A powerful new technique for identifying privileged molecular fragments with useful applications in combinatorial chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1998, 38, 511-522.
38. Flower, D. R., On the properties of bit string-based measures of chemical similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1998, 38, 379-386.
39. Dean, P. M., and Lewis, R. A., (eds), Molecular Diversity in Drug Design. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1999.
40. Durant, J. L., Leland, B. A., Henry, D. R., and Nourse, J. G., Reoptimization of MDL keys for use in drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 2002, 42, 1273-1280.
41. James, C.A. and Weininger, D., Daylight Theory Manual. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc., 1995.
42. Tripos, UNITY Reference Manual. Tripos Inc., St. Louis, MO, 1995.
43. JChem 3.2, 2006, ChemAxon.
44. Brown, N., McKay, B., and Gasteiger, J., Fingal: A novel approach to geometric fingerprinting and a comparative study of its application to 3D-QSAR modelling. QSAR Comb. Sci., 2005, 24, 480-484.
45. Swamidass, S. J. and Baldi, P., Mathematical correction for fingerprint similarity measures to improve chemical retrieval. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2007, 47, 952-964.
46. Shemetulskis, N. E., Weininger, D., Blankley, C. J., Yang, J. J., and Humblet, C., Stigmata:An algorithm to determine structural commonalities in diverse datasets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1996, 36, 862-871.
47. Gasteiger, J., Rudolph, C., and Sadowski, J., Automatic generation of 3D-atomic coordinates for organic molecules. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 1990, 3, 537-547.
48. Peterson, W.W. and Brown, D. T., Cyclic codes for error detection. Proc. IRE, 1961, 49, 228-235.
49. Introducing InChI Key. Chem. Intern., 2007, 29.
50. Secure hash standard (shs). FIPS 180-182, 2002, US Government.
51. Hopfinger, A. J., A QSAR investigation of dihydrofolate reductase inhibition by baker triazines based upon molecular shape analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 7196-7206.
52. Rush, T. S., Grant, J. A., Mosyak, L., and Nicholls, A. A shape- based 3-D scaffold hopping method and its application to a bacterial protein-protein interaction. J. Med. Chem., 2005, 48, 1489-1495.
53. Masek, B. B., Merchant, A., and Matthew, J. B., Molecular shape comparison of angiotensin ii receptor antagonists. J. Med. Chem., 1993, 36, 1230-1238.
54. Proschak, E., Rupp, M., Derksen, S., and Schneider, G., Shapelets: Possibilities and limitations of shape-based virtual screening. J. Comput. Chem., 2007, 29, 108-114.
55. Lorensen, W. E. and Cline, H. E., Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Comput. Graph, 1987, 21, 163-169.
56. Dunn, F. and Parberry, I., 3D Math primer for Graphics and Game Development. Wordware Publishing, Inc., 2002.
57. Kabsch, W., Asolution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr., 1976, 32, 922.
58. Kellogg, G. E. and Abraham, D. J., Key, lock, and locksmith: Complementary hydropathic map predictions of drug structure from a known receptor-receptor structure from known drugs. J. Mol. Graph. Model, 1992, 10, 212-217.
59. Goodford, P. J., A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J. Med. Chem., 1985, 28, 849-857.
60. Warwicker, J. and Watson, H. C., Calculation of the electric potential in the active site cleft due to alpha-helix dipoles. J. Mol. Biol., 1982, 157, 671-679.
61. Rogers, N. K. and Sternberg, M. J. Electrostatic interactions in globular proteins. Different dielectric models applied to the packing of alpha helices. J. Mol. Biol., 1984, 174, 527-542.
62. Klebe, G., Abraham, U., and Mietzner, T., Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. J. Med. Chem., 1994, 37, 4130-4146.
63. Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., and Bunce, J. D., Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
64. Gasteiger, J. and Marsili, M., A new model for calculating atomic charges in molecules. Tetrahedron Lett., 1978, 34, 3181-3184.
65. Clark, M., Cramer, R., Jones, D., Patterson, D., and Simeroth, P., Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 2. Toward its use with 3D structural databases. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 1990, 3, 47-59.
66. Kearsley, S. K. and Smith, G. M., An alternative method for the alignment of molecular structures: Maximizing electrostatic and steric overlap. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 1990, 3, 615-633.
67. Viswanadhan, V. N., Ghose, A. K., Revankar, G. R., and Robins, R. K., Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 4. Additional parameters for hydrophobic and dispersive interactions and their application for an automated superposition of certain naturally occurring nucleoside antibiotics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1989, 29, 163-172.
68. Coutsias, E. A., Seok, C., and Dill, K. A., Using quaternions to calculate RMSD. J. Comput. Chem., 2004, 25, 1849-1857.
69. Kearsley, S. K., An algorithm for the simultaneous superposition of a structural series. J. Comput. Chem., 1990, 11, 1187-1192.
70. Klebe, G., Mietzner, T., and Weber, F., Different approaches toward an automatic structural alignment of drug molecules: Applications to sterol mimics, thrombin and thermolysin inhibitors. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 1994, 8, 751-778.
71. Pastor, M., Cruciani, G., McLay, I., Pickett, S., and Clementi, S., Grid-independent descriptors (GRIND): A novel class of alignment independent three-dimensional molecular descriptors. J. Med. Chem., 2000, 43, 3233-3243.
72. Crivori, P., Cruciani, G., Carrupt, P.-A., and Testa, B., Predicting blood-brain barrier permeation from three-dimensional molecular structure. J. Med. Chem., 2000, 43, 2204-2216.
73. Cruciani, G., Pastor, M., and Guba, W., VolSurf: A new tool for the pharmacokinetic optimization of lead compounds. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 2000, 11(Suppl 2), S29-S39.
74. Miller, K. J., Additivity methods in molecular polarizability. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 8533-8542.
75. Wermuth, C. G., Ganellin, C. R., Lindberg, P., and Mitscher, L. A., Glossary of terms used in medicinal chemistry. Pure Appl. Chem., 1998, 70, 1129-1143.
76. Sheridan, R. P., Nilakantan, R., Dixon, J. S., and Venkataraghavan, R., The ensemble approach to distance geometry: Application to the nicotinic pharmacophore. J. Med. Chem., 1986, 29, 899-906.
77. Dammkoehler, R. A., Karasek, S. F., Shands, E. F., and Marshall, G. R., Constrained search of conformational hyperspace. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 1989, 3, 3-21.
78. Martin, Y. C., Bures, M. G., Danaher, E. A., DeLazzer, J., Lico, I., and Pavlik, P. A., A fast new approach to pharmacophore mapping and its application to dopaminergic and benzodiazepine agonists. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 1993, 7, 83-102.
79. Barnum, D., Greene, J., Smellie, A., and Sprague, P., Identification of common functional configurations among molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1996, 36, 563-571.
80. Bron, C. and Kerbosch, J., Finding all cliques of an undirected graph (algorithm 457). Comm. ACM, 1973, 16, 575-576.
81. Samudrala, R. and Moult, J., A graph-theoretic algorithm for comparative modeling of protein structure. J. Mol. Biol., 1998, 279, 287-302.
82. Hahn, M. and Rogers, D., Receptor surface models. 2. Application to quantitative structure-activity relationships studies. J. Med. Chem., 1995, 38, 2091-2102.
83. Hahn, M., Receptor surface models. 1. Definition and construction. J. Med. Chem., 1995, 38, 2080-2090.
84. Santos-Filho, O. A. and Hopfinger, A. J., The 4D-QSAR Paradigm: Application to a novel set of non-peptidic HIV protease inhibitors. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 2002, 21, 369-381.
85. Vedani, A. and Dobler, M., 5D-QSAR: The key for simulating induced fit? J. Med. Chem., 2002, 45, 2139-2149.
86. Vedani, A. and Dobler, M., Multidimensional QSAR: Moving from three- to fivedimensional concepts. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat., 2002, 21, 382-390.
87. Sheridan, R. P. and Miller, M. D., A Method for visualizing recurrent topological substructures in sets of active molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1998, 38, 915-924.
88. Birchall, K., Gillet, V. J., Harper, G., and Pickett, S. D., Training similarity measures for specific activities: Application to reduced graphs. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2006, 46, 577-586.
89. Azencott, C.-A., Ksikes, A., Swamidass, S., Chen, J., Ralaivola, L., and Baldi, P., One- to four-dimensional kernels for virtual screening and the prediction of physical, chemical, and biological properties. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2007, 47, 965-974.
90. Fröhlich, H., Kernel methods in chemo- and bioinformatics. PhD thesis, University of Tuebingen, 2006.
91. Kashima, H., Tsuda, K., and Inokuchi, A., Marginalized kernels between labeled graphs. Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2003), Washington DC, 2003.
92. Ralaivola, L., Swamidass, S. J., Saigo, H., and Baldi, P., Graph kernels for chemical informatics. Neur. Netw., 2005, 18, 1093-1110.
93. Rupp, M., Proschak, E., and Schneider, G., Kernel approach to molecular similarity based on iterative graph similarity. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2007, 47, 2280-2286.
94. Swamidass, S. J., Chen, J., Bruand, J., Phung, P., Ralaivola, L., and Baldi, P., Kernels for small molecules and the prediction of mutagenicity, toxicity and anti-cancer activity. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21, 359-368.
95. Borgwardt, K. M., Ong, C. S., Schoenauer, S., Vishwanathan, S.V. N., Smola, A. J., and Kriegel, H.-P., Protein function prediction via graph kernels. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21, 47-56.
96. Gaertner, T., A survey of kernels for structured data. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newslett., 2003, 5, 49-58.
97. Bishop, C. M., Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, NewYork, 2006.
98. Leslie, C., Eskin, E., and Noble, W. S., The spectrum kernel: A string kernel for protein classification. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 2002.
99. Leslie, C. S., Eskin, E., Cohen, A., Weston, J., and Noble, W. S., Mismatch string kernels for discriminative protein classification. Bioinformatics, 2004, 20, 467-476.
100. Gower, J. C., A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 1971, 27, 857-871.
101. Fröhlich, H., Wegner, J. K., and Zell, A., Optimal assignment kernels for attributed molecular graphs. The 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2005), pp. 225-232, Omnipress, Madison, WI, 2005.
102. Fechner, N., Jahn, A., Hinselmann, G., and Zell, A., Atomic local neighborhood exibility incorporation into a structured similarity measure for QSAR. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 2009, 49, 549-560.
103. Vert, J.-P., The optimal assignment kernel is not positive definite. Tech. Rep., 2008.
104. Mahe, P., Ralaivola, L., Stoven, V., and Vert, J.-P., The pharmacophore kernel for virtual screening with support vector machines. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 2006, 46, 2003-2014.