Frog: A FRee Online druG 3D conformation generator

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 35, Issue SUPPL.2, 2007, Pages

  Leite, T Bohme ^a   Gomes, D ^a   Miteva, M A ^a   Chomilier, J ^b   Villoutreix, B O ^a   Tuffery P ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; PLIABILITY; PROTEIN DATABASE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; CHEMISTRY; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; LIGANDS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PLIABILITY; PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SOFTWARE;

EID: 34547594044     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm289     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Congreve, M., Murray, C.W. and Blundell, T.L. (2005) Structural biology and drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today, 10, 895-907.
2. Hardy, L.W. and Malikayil, A. (2003) The impact of structure-guided drug design on clinical agents. Curr. Drug Discov., 15, 15-20.
3. Abagyan, R. and Totrov, M. (2001) High-throughput docking for lead generation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 5, 375-382.
4. Alvarez, J.C. (2004) High-throughput docking as a source of novel drug leads. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 8, 365-370.
5. Schneider, G. and Bohm, H.J. (2002) Virtual screening and fast automated docking methods. Drug Discov. Today, 7, 64-70.
6. Weininger, D. (1988) SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 28, 31-36.
7. Weininger, D., Weininger, A. and Weininger, J.L. (1988) SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of Unique SMILES Notation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29, 97-101.
8. Dalby, A., Nourse, J.G., Hounshell, W.D., Gushurst, A.K.I., Grier, D.L., Leland, B.A. and Laufer, J. (1992) Description of several chemical structure file formats used by computer programs developed at Molecular Design Limited. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 32, 244-255.
9. Irwin, J.J. and Shoichet, B.K. (2005) ZINC-a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 45, 177-182.
10. Miteva, M.A., Violas, S., Montes, M., Gomez, D., Tuffery, P. and Villoutreix, B.O. (2006) FAF-Drugs: free ADME/tox filtering of compound collections. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, W738-W744.
11. Wheeler, D.L., Barrett, T., Benson, D.A., Bryant, S.H., Canese, K., Chetvernin, V., Church, D.M., DiCuccio, M., Edgar, R. et al. (2007) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D5-D12.
12. Sadowski, J. and Gasteiger, J. (1993) From atoms and bonds to three-dimensional atomic coordinates: automatic model builders. Chem. Rev., 93, 2567-2581.
13. Steinbeck, C., Hoppe, C., Kuhn, S., Floris, M., Guha, R. and Willighagen, E.L. (2006) Recent developments of the chemistry development kit (CDK)-an open-source java library for chemo-and bioinformatics. Curr. Pharm. Des., 12, 2111-2120.
14. Engh, R.A. and Huber, R. (1991) Accurate bond and angle parameters for X-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Cryst., A47, 392-400.
15. Halgren, T. (1996) Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem., 5&6, 490-519.
16. Halgren, T. (1996) Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions. J. Comput. Chem., 5&6, 520-552.
17. Halgren, T. (1996) Merck molecular force field. III. Molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies for MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem., 5&6, 553-586.
18. Halgren, T. (1996) Merck molecular force field. IV. Conformational energies and geometries for MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem., 5&6, 587-615.
19. Halgren, T. (1996) Merck molecular force field. V. Extension of MMFF94 using experimental data, additional computational data, and empirical rules. J. Comput. Chem., 5&6, 616-641.
20. Zuker, M. and Somorjai, R.L. (1989) The alignment of protein structures in three dimensions. Bull. Math. Biol., 51, 55-78.
21. Hartshorn, M.J., Verdonk, M.L., Chessari, G., Brewerton, S.C., Mooij, W.T., Mortenson, P.N. and Murray, C.W. (2007) Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance. J. Med. Chem., 50, 726-741.
22. Guha, R., Howard, M.T., Hutchison, G.R., Murray-Rust, P., Rzepa, H., Steinbeck, C., Wegner, J.K. and Willighagen, E. (2006) The Blue Obelisk-interoperability in chemical informatics. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 46, 991-998.
23. Brzozowski, A.M., Pike, A.C., Dauter, Z., Hubbard, R.E., Bonn, T., Engstrom, O., Ohman, L., Greene, G.L., Gustafsson, J.A. et al. (1997) Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature, 389, 753-758.