Beyond Embedded: Creating an Online-Learning Community Integrating Information Literacy and Composition Courses

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 416-421

  Burgoyne, Mary Beth ^a   Chuppa Cornell, Kim ^a  

^a Chandler Gilbert Community College   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Information literacy; Learning communities; Library instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937161520     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2015.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arp L., Woodard B.S., Lindstrom J., Shonrock D.D. Faculty-librarian collaboration to achieve integration of information literacy. Reference and User Services Quarterly 2006, 46(1):18-23. (Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/).
2. Association of College and Research Libraries Information literacy competency standards for higher education Retrieved from. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracy%20competency.
3. Association of College and Research Libraries Framework for information literacy for higher education Retrieved from. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework.
4. Barone K., Weathers G.B. Launching a learning community in a small liberal arts university. College and Graduate Libraries 2004, 11(1):1-9. 10.1300/J106v11n01_01.
5. Chandler-Gilbert Community College Chandler-Gilbert community college fact book Retrieved from. http://www.cgc.maricopa.edu/services/InstitutionalResearch/Documents/FALL%202014%20Documents/FactBook2014_Final.pdf.
6. Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Key findings: Student-faculty interaction Retrieved from. http://www.ccsse.org/survey/survey.cfm.
7. Cook J.M. A library success course and student success rates: A longitudinal study. College and Research Libraries 2014, 75(3):272-283.
8. Dewey B.I. The embedded librarian: Strategic campus collaborations. Resource Sharing & Information Networks 2004, 17(1-2):5-17. 10.1300/J121v17n01{combining macron below}02.
9. Emmons M., Wilkinson F.C. The academic library impact on student persistence. College and Research Libraries 2011, 72(2):128-149. (Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/).
10. Hall R. The 'embedded' librarian in a freshman speech class. College and Research Libraries News 2008, 69(1):28-30. (Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/).
11. Holmes C., Oakleaf M. The official (and unofficial) rules for norming rubrics successfully. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2013, 39(6):599-602. 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.09.001.
12. Johnston H., Educational Partnerships, L.C. Best practices in grading: Research into practice. Educational Partnerships, Inc. Retrieved from. http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED538743.
13. Kadavy C., Chuppa-Cornell K. A personal touch: Embedding library faculty into online English 102. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 2011, 39(1):63-77.
14. Lebbin V.K. Students perceptions on the long-range value of information literacy instruction through a learning community. Research Strategies 2006, 20:204-218. 10.1016/j.resstr.2006.06.001.
15. Mann J.T., Hennenberry S.R. What characteristics of college students influence their decisions to select online courses?. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 2012, 15(3). (Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter154/mann_henneberry154.html).
16. Mazella D., Heidel L., Ke I. Integrating reading, information literacy, and literary studies instruction in a three-way collaboration. Learning Assistance Review 2011, 16(2):41-53. (Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/ps/i.do?).
17. Mery Y., Newby J., Peng K. Why one-shot literacy sessions are not the future of instruction: A case for online credit courses. College and Research Libraries 2012, 73(4):366-377. (Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/).
18. Owens R. Where the students are: The embedded librarian project at Daytona Beach college. Florida Libraries 2008, 51(1):8-10. (Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/).
19. Perin D. Facilitating student learning through contextualization. CCRC Brief 2011, 53. (Retrieved from http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/attachments/facilitating-learning-contextualization-brief.pdf).
20. Ramsay K.M., Kinnie J. The embedded librarian. Library Journal 2006, 131(6):34-35. (Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/).
21. Reddy Y.M., Andrade H. A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2010, 35(4):435-448. 10.1080/02602930902862859.
22. Rinto E.E., Cogbill-Seiders E.I. Library instruction and themed-composition courses: An investigation of factors that impact student learning. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2015, 41(1):14-20. 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.11.010.
23. Sanabria J.E. The library as an academic partner in student retention and graduation: The library's collaboration with the freshman year seminar initiative at the Bronx Community College. Collaborative Librarianship 2013, 5(2):94+. (Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/).
24. Victor P., Otto J., Mutschler C. Assessment of library instruction on undergraduate student success in a documents-based research course: The benefits of librarian, archivist, and faculty collaboration. Collaborative Librarianship 2013, 5(3):154+. (Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/).
25. Voelker T.J.E. The library and my learning community: First year students' impressions of library services. Reference and User Services Quarterly Winter 2006, 72+. (Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/).
26. Wong S.H.R., Cmor D. Measuring association between library instruction and graduation GPA. College and Research Libraries 2011, 72(5):464-473. (Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ez1.maricopa.edu/).