Perceptual multistability predicted by search model for Bayesian decisions

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2008, Pages

  Sundareswara, Rashmi ^a,c   Schrater, Paul R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b University of Minnesota   (United States)

^c EECS   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Context; Markov renewal process; Multistability; Perceptual decision making

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DECISION MAKING; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; MEMORY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING;

BAYES THEOREM; DECISION MAKING; FIXATION, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 44349136909     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.5.12     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (1999). Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 4341-4353.
2. Attneave, F. (1971). Multistability in perception. Scientific American, 225, 63-71.
3. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145-167.
4. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 3, 13-21.
5. Borsellino, A., De Marco, A., Allazetta, A., Rinesi, S., & Bartolini, B. (1972). Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik, 10, 139-144.
6. Davis, J., Schiffman, H. R., & Greist-Bousquet, S. (1990). Semantic context and figure-ground organization. Psychological Research, 52, 306-309.
7. Dawson, M. R. (1987). Moving contexts do affect the perceived direction of apparent motion in motion competition displays. Vision Research, 27, 799-809.
8. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
9. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Improvements on cross validation: The .632+ Bootstrap method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 548-560.
10. Einhäuser, W., Martin, K. A., & König, P. (2004). Are switches in perception of the Necker cube related to eye position? European Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2811-2818.
11. Ellis, S. R., & Stark, L. (1978). Eye movements during the viewing of Necker cubes. Perception, 7, 575-581.
12. Gepshtein, S., & Kubovy, M. (2005). Stability and change in perception: Spatial organization in temporal context. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 487-495.
13. Hol, K., Koene, A., & van Ee, R. (2003). Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of Vision, 3(7):3, 486-498, http://journalofvision.org/3/7/3/, doi:10.1167/3.7.3.
14. Kawabata, N., Yamagami, K., & Noaki, M. (1978). Visual fixation points and depth perception. Vision Research, 18, 853-854.
15. Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 271-304.
16. Kersten, D., & Schrater, P. R. (2002). Pattern inference theory: A probabilistic approach to vision. In R. Mausfeld & D. Heyer (Eds.), Perception and the physical world. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Kramer, P., & Yantis, S. (1997). Perceptual grouping in space and time: Evidence from the Ternus display. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 87-99.
18. Lee, T. S., & Mumford, D. (2003). Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 20, 1434-1448.
19. Lehky, S. R. (1988). An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception, 17, 215-228.
20. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254-264.
21. Long, G. M., Toppino, T. C., & Mondin, G. W. (1992). Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 609-616.
22. Mamassian, P., & Goutcher, R. (2005). Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. Journal of Vision, 5(4):7, 361-375, http://journalofvision.org/5/4/7/, doi:10.1167/5.4.7.
23. Mamassian, P., & Landy, M. S. (1998). Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings. Vision Research, 38, 2817-2832.
24. Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4(7):2, 539-551, http://journalofvision.org/4/ 7/2/, doi:10.1167/4.7.2.
25. Pelton, L. H., & Solley, C. M. (1968). Acceleration of reversals of a Necker cube. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 585-588.
26. Peterson, M. A., & Gibson, B. S. (1994). Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organizations: Operations on outlines and subjective contours. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 551-564.
27. Peterson, M. A., Harvey, E. M., & Weidenbacher, H. J. (1991). Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: Which route counts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1075-1089.
28. Pouget, A., Dayan, P., & Zemel, R. S. (2003). Inference and computation with population codes. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 26, 381-410.
29. Rock, I., Hall, S., & Davis, J. (1994). Why do ambiguous figures reverse? Acta Psychologica, 87, 33-59.
30. Ross, S. (1992). Applied probability models with optimization applications. Mineola, NY: Dover Press.
31. Schrater, P. R., & Sundareswara, R. (2006). Theory and dynamics of perceptual bistability. Neural Information Processing Systems, 19, 1217-1224.
32. Sobel, K. V., & Blake, R. (2002). How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry. Perception, 31, 813-824.
33. Taylor, M. M., & Aldridge, K. D. (1974). Stochastic processes in reversing figure perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 9-27.
34. Toppino, T. C. (2003). Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1285-1295.
35. van Ee, R., Adams, W. J., & Mamassian, P. (2003). Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: Bistability in stereoscopic slant perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 20, 1398-1406.
36. van Ee, R., Noest, A. J., Brascamp, J. W., & van den Berg, A. V. (2006). Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: Means do not make the difference. Vision Research, 46, 3129-3141.
37. van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C., & Brouwer, G. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bistability. Vision Research, 45, 41-55.
38. Walker, P. (1978). Binocular rivalry: Central or peripheral selective processes? Psychological Bulletin, 85, 376-389.
39. Yuille, A., & Kersten, D. (2006). Vision as Bayesian inference: Analysis by synthesis? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 301-308.