Bayesian sampling in visual perception

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 30, 2011, Pages 12491-12496

  Moreno Bote, Rubén ^a,b   Knill, David C ^b   Pouget, Alexandre ^b  

^a PARC SANITARI SANT JOAN DE DÉU   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Neuronal network; Neuronal noise; Perceptual bistability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BAYES THEOREM; ENERGY; IMAGE DISPLAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; VISION;

BAYES THEOREM; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NERVE NET; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79961045634     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1101430108     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:429-433. (Pubitemid 34100953)
2. Jacobs RA (1999) Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Res 39:3621-3629.
3. Landy MS, Maloney LT, Johnston EB, Young M (1995) Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Res 35:389-412.
4. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Gon JJ (1999) Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81:1355-1364. (Pubitemid 29272452)
5. Körding KP, Wolpert DM (2006) Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends Cogn Sci 10:319-326. (Pubitemid 44094227)
6. Hillis JM, Watt SJ, Landy MS, Banks MS (2004) Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. J Vis 4:967-992. (Pubitemid 41522184)
7. Knill DC (2007) Robust cue integration: A Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant. J Vis 7:5.1-5.24.
8. Knill DC (2003) Mixture models and the probabilistic structure of depth cues. Vision Res 43:831-854.
9. Tjan BS, Braje WL, Legge GE, Kersten D (1995) Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise. Vision Res 35:3053-3069.
10. Gold JM, Tadin D, Cook SC, Blake R (2008) The efficiency of biological motion perception. Percept Psychophys 70:88-95.
11. Kersten D, Mamassian P, Yuille A (2004) Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu Rev Psychol 55:271-304.
12. Hinton GE (2007) Learning multiple layers of representation. Trends Cogn Sci 11:428-434.
13. Fiser J, Berkes P, Orbán G, Lengyel M (2010) Statistically optimal perception and learning: From behavior to neural representations. Trends Cogn Sci 14:119-130.
14. Blake R (2001) A primer on binocular rivalry. Brain and Mind 2:5-38.
15. Blake R, Logothetis NK (2002) Visual competition. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:13-21.
16. Dayan P (1998) A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural Comput 10:1119-1135.
17. Necker LA (1832) Observations on some remarkable phenomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal of geometrical solid. Lond Edinburgh Phil Mag J Sci 3:329-337.
18. Rubin E (1958) Figure and ground. Readings in Perception, eds Beardslee DC, Wertheimer M (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York), pp 194-203.
19. Sundareswara R, Schrater PR (2008) Perceptual multistability predicted by search model for Bayesian decisions. J Vis 8:12.1-12.19.
20. Hoyer PO, Hyvarinen A (2003) Interpreting neural response variability as Monte Carlo sampling of the posterior. In Becker S, et al., editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. MIT Press; 2003. pp. 277-284.
21. Moreno-Bote R, Shpiro A, Rinzel J, Rubin N (2008) Bi-stable depth ordering of superimposed moving gratings. J Vis 8:20.1-20.13.
22. Ma WJ, Beck JM, Latham PE, Pouget A (2006) Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat Neurosci 9:1432-1438. (Pubitemid 44646216)
23. Mamassian P, Landy MS (1998) Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings. Vision Res 38:2817-2832. (Pubitemid 28339816)
24. Mamassian P, Landy MS (2001) Interaction of visual prior constraints. Vision Res 41:2653-2668. (Pubitemid 32772716)
25. Priebe NJ, Mechler F, Carandini M, Ferster D (2004) The contribution of spike threshold to the dichotomy of cortical simple and complex cells. Nat Neurosci 7:1113-1122. (Pubitemid 41184452)
26. Carandini M, Ferster D (2000) Membrane potential and firing rate in cat primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 20:470-484. (Pubitemid 30220533)
27. Moreno-Bote R, Rinzel J, Rubin N (2007) Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. J Neurophysiol 98:1125-1139. (Pubitemid 47435869)
28. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, Berlin).
29. Sheinberg DL, Logothetis NK (1997) The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:3408-3413. (Pubitemid 27157325)
30. Shpiro A, Moreno-Bote R, Rubin N, Rinzel J (2009) Balance between noise and adaptation in competitionmodels of perceptual bistability. J Comput Neurosci 27:37-54.
31. Laing CR, Chow CC (2002) A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. J Comput Neurosci 12:39-53. (Pubitemid 34476986)
32. Markram H, Tsodyks M (1996) Redistribution of synaptic efficacy between neocortical pyramidal neurons. Nature 382:807-810. (Pubitemid 26299563)
33. Abbott LF, Varela JA, Sen K, Nelson SB (1997) Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science 275:220-224. (Pubitemid 27034764)
34. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1996) Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379:549-553. (Pubitemid 26049583)
35. Levelt WJM (1968) On Binocular Rivalry (Mouton, The Hague).
36. Hupé JM, Rubin N (2003) The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: A fresh look at plaids. Vision Res 43:531-548.
37. Cumming BG, DeAngelis GC (2001) The physiology of stereopsis. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:203-238. (Pubitemid 32695228)
38. Graf AB, Kohn A, Jazayeri M, Movshon JA (2011) Decoding the activity of neuronal populations in macaque primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 14:239-245.
39. Moreno-Bote R, Shpiro A, Rinzel J, Rubin N (2010) Alternation rate in perceptual bistability is maximal at and symmetric around equi-dominance. J Vis 10(11):1,1-18.
40. Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
41. Griffiths TL, Tenenbaum JB (2005) Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognit Psychol 51:334-384. (Pubitemid 41693213)
42. Tenenbaum JB, Griffiths TL, Kemp C (2006) Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends Cogn Sci 10:309-318. (Pubitemid 44094231)
43. Sugrue LP, Corrado GS, Newsome WT (2004) Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex. Science 304:1782-1787. (Pubitemid 38787891)