Demonstration of cue recruitment: Change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 483-488

  Haijiang, Qi ^a   Saunders, Jeffrey A ^b   Stone, Rebecca W ^b   Backus, Benjamin T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bistable perception; Classical conditioning; Perceptual learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; CUE RECRUITMENT; DEVICE; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATING WIRE FRAME CUBE; STATE DEPENDENT LEARNING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; CUES; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 31044437682     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506728103     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. von Helmholtz, H. (1910) Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik,
2. trans. Optical Society of America (1925) The Perceptions of Vision, Treatise on Physiological Optics (Optical Society of America, New York), Vol. 3 (German).
3. Gibson, J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).
4. Brunswik, E. (1956) Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley), pp. 92, 96, 123-131.
5. Berkeley, G. (1709) An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision (Dublin), 1st Ed.
6. Condillac, E. B. A. d. (1754) Treatise on Sensations,
7. trans. Philip, F. (1982) A Treatise on Systems, A Treatise on Sensations, Philosophical Works of Etienne Bonnot, Abbe de Condillac (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ), Vol. 1.
8. Kant, I. (1781) Critique of Pure Reason;
9. trans. Meiklejohn, J. M. D. (1990) in Critique of Pure Reason, Philosophical Classics (Dover. New York).
10. von Helmholtz, H. (1878) The Facts of Perception;
11. reprinted (1971) in Selected Writings of Hermann Helmholtz, ed. Kahl, R. (Wesleyan Univ. Press, Middletown, CT).
12. James, W. (1890) The Principles of Psychology; reprinted (1983) (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 722-912.
13. Hebb, D. O. (1949) Organization of Behavior (Wiley, New York).
14. Ames, A. J. (1953) in Vision and Action, ed. Ratner, S. (Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, NJ), pp. 251-274.
15. von Fieandt, K. (1936) Archiv für die Gesamte Psychologie 96, 467-495.
16. Wallach, H., O'Connell, D. N. & Neisser, U. (1953) J. Exp. Psychol. 45, 360-368.
17. Sinha, P. & Poggio, T. (1996) Nature 384, 460-463.
18. Epstein, W. (1965) Am. J. Psychol. 78, 120-123.
19. Wallach, H. & Austin, P. (1954) Am. J. Psychol. 67, 338-340.
20. Simmons, K. (1993) Early Visual Development: Normal and Abnormal (Oxford Univ. Press, New York).
21. Kersten, D., Mamassian, P. & Yuille, A. (2004) Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 271-304.
22. Knill, D. C. & Richards, W. (1996) Perception as Bayesian Inference (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.).
23. Pavlov, I. P. (1927) Conditioned Reflexes (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford).
24. Rescorla, R. A. (2003) Span. J. Psychol. 6, 185-195.
25. Smedslund, J. (1955) Multiple Probability Learning (Oslo Univ. Press, Oslo).
26. Mulligan, J. B. (1986) Perception 15, 27-36.
27. Gallistel, C. R., Fairhurst, S. & Balsam, P. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13124-13131.
28. Mayhew, J. E. & Anstis, S. M. (1972) Percept. Psychophys. 12, 77-85.
29. Barlow, H. (1990) Vision Res. 30, 1561-1571.
30. Durgin, F. H. & Proffitt, D. R. (1996) Spat. Vis. 9, 423-474.
31. Blaser, E. & Domini, F. (2002) Vision Res. 42, 273-279.
32. Nawrot, M. & Blake, R. (1991) Percept. Psychophys. 49, 230-244.
33. Bradley, D. C., Chang, G. C. & Andersen, R. A. (1998) Nature 392, 714-717.
34. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B. & Young, M. (1995) Vision Res. 35, 389-412.
35. Rescorla, R. A. (1980) Pavlovian Second-Order Conditioning: Studies in Associative Learning (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).
36. Garcia, J. & Koelling, R. A. (1966) Psychon. Sci. 4, 123-124.
37. Wilcoxon, H. C., Dragoin, W. B. & Kral, P. A. (1971) Science 171, 826-828.
38. Seligman, M. E. P. (1970) Psychol. Rev. 77, 406-418.
39. Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A. B. & Lau, R. (1997) Nature 385, 308 (lett.).
40. Ecker, A. J. & Heller, L. M. (2005) Perception 34, 59-75.
41. McCollough, C. (1965) Science 149, 1115-1116.
42. Siegel, S. & Allan, L. G. (1996) Psychon. Bull. Rev. 3, 314-321.
43. Sigel, C. & Nachmias, J. (1975) Vision Res. 15, 829-836.
44. Allan, L. G., Siegel, S., Kulatunga-Moruzi, C., Eissenberg, T. & Chapman, C. A. (1997) Percept. Psychophys. 59, 1327-1334.
45. Dodwell, P. C. & Humphrey, G. K. (1990) Psychol. Rev. 97, 78-89.
46. Allan, L. G. & Siegel, S. (1993) Psychol. Rev. 100, 342-346; discussion 347-350.
47. Bedford, F. L. (1995) Cognition 54, 253-297.
48. Howells, T. H. (1944) J. Exp. Psychol. 34, 87-103.
49. Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S. & Bülthoff, H. H. (2000) Nat. Neurosci. 3, 69-73.
50. Atkins, J. E., Fiser, J. & Jacobs, R. A. (2001) Vision Res. 41, 449-461.
51. Jacobs, R. A. & Fine, I. (1999) Vision Res. 39, 4062-4075.
52. Adams, W. J., Graf, E. W. & Ernst, M. O. (2004) Nat. Neurosci. 7, 1057-1058.
53. Davies, P., Davies, G. L. & Bennett, S. (1982) Perception 11, 663-669.
54. Lieberman, D. A. (2000) Learning: Behavior and Cognition (Wadsworth, Stamford, CT), 3rd Ed.
55. Drever, J. (1960) Annu. Rev. Psychol. 11, 131-160.
56. Rescorla, R. A. (1988) Am. Psychol. 43, 151-160.
57. Gibson, E. J. (1963) Annu. Rev. Psychol. 14, 29-56.
58. Gibson, J. J. & Gibson, E. J. (1955) Psychol. Rev. 62, 32-41.
59. Sagi, D. & Tanne, D. (1994) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4, 195-199.
60. Fahle, M. & Morgan, M. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 292-297.
61. Dosher, B. A. & Lu, Z. L. (1999) Vision Res. 39, 3197-3221.
62. Gibson, E. J. & Pick, A. D. (2000) An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development (Oxford Univ. Press, New York).
63. Fine, I. & Jacobs, R. A. (2002) J. Vis. 2, 190-203.
64. Fahle, M. (2002) in Perceptual Learning, eds. Fahle, M. & Poggio, T. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. ix-xii.
65. Hammond, K. R. & Stewart, T. R. (2001) The Essential Brunswik (Oxford Univ. Press, New York).
66. Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D. & Malik, J. (2001) Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. 2, 416-423.
67. Elder, J. H. & Goldberg, R. M. (2002) J. Vis. 2, 324-353.
68. Geisler, W. S. & Kersten, D. (2002) Nat. Neurosci. 5, 508-510.
69. Barlow, H. (2001) Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 602-607; discussion 652-671.
70. Wallach, H. (1985) Am. Psychol. 40, 399-404.
71. Purves, D. & Lotto, R. B. (2003) Why We See What We Do: An Emperical Theory of Vision (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA).
72. Baron, J. (1974) Can. J. Psychol. 28, 37-50.
73. Fiser, J. & Aslin, R. N. (2001) Psychol. Sci. 12, 499-504.
74. Fiser, J. & Aslin, R. N. (2002) J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 28, 458-467.
75. Fiser, J. & Aslin, R. N. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15822-15826.
76. Wallis, G. & Bülthoff, H. (2002) in Perceptual Learning, eds. Fahle, M. & Poggio, T. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 299-315.
77. Geisler, W. S. & Diehl, R. L. (2002) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 357, 419-448.
78. Rubin, N., Nakayama, K. & Shapley, R. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 461-467.
79. Ahissar, M. & Hochstein, S. (2004) Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 457-464.