Increasing live birth rate by preimplantation genetic screening of pooled polar bodies using array comparative genomic hybridization

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Feichtinger, Michael ^a   Stopp, Tina ^a   Göbl, Christian ^b   Feichtinger, Elisabeth ^a   Vaccari, Enrico ^a   Mädel, Ulrike ^a   Laccone, Franco ^c   Stroh Weigert, Monika ^a   Hengstschläger, Markus ^a,c   Feichtinger, Wilfried ^a   Neesen, Jürgen ^c  

^a Wunschbaby Institut Feichtinger   (Austria)

^b UNIV KLIN FÜR FRAUENHEILKUNDE   (Austria)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BIRTH RATE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CELL COUNT; CHROMOSOME NUMBER; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; OOCYTE; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; LIVE BIRTH; POLAR BODY; PREGNANCY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

ANEUPLOIDY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; LIVE BIRTH; POLAR BODIES; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84932648831     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128317     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Hassold T, Hunt P (2001) To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2: 280-291. PMID: 11283700
2. Lintsen AM, Eijkemans MJ, Hunault CC, Bouwmans CA, Hakkaart L, Habbema JD, et al. (2007) Predicting ongoing pregnancy chances after IVF and ICSI: a national prospective study. Hum Reprod 22: 2455-2462. PMID: 17636281
3. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutierrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, et al. (2011) The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril 95: 520-524. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003 PMID: 20537630
4. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM (1990) Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 344: 768-770. PMID: 2330030
5. Verlinsky Y, Ginsberg N, Lifchez A, Valle J, Moise J, Strom CM (1990) Analysis of the first polar body: preconception genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 5: 826-829. PMID: 2266156
6. Munne S (2002) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities. Reprod Biomed Online 4: 183-196. PMID: 12470583
7. Rechitsky S, Verlinsky O, Chistokhina A, Sharapova T, Ozen S, Masciangelo C, et al. (2002) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cancer predisposition. Reprod Biomed Online 5: 148-155. PMID: 12419039
8. Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Verlinsky O, Masciangelo C, Lederer K, Kuliev A (2002) Preimplantation diagnosis for early-onset Alzheimer disease caused by V717L mutation. JAMA 287: 1018-1021. PMID: 11866650
9. Twisk M, Mastenbroek S, van Wely M, Heineman MJ, Van der Veen F, Repping S (2006) Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD005291. PMID: 16437524
10. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Verhoeve HR, et al. (2007) In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med 357: 9-17. PMID: 17611204
11. Goossens V, Traeger-Synodinos J, Coonen E, De Rycke M, Moutou C, Pehlivan T, et al. (2012) ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XI: cycles from January to December 2008 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2009. Hum Reprod 27: 1887-1911. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des106 PMID: 22572107
12. Capalbo A, Treff NR, Cimadomo D, Tao X, Upham K, Ubaldi FM, et al. (2014) Comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative real-time PCR-based aneuploidy screening of blastocyst biopsies. Eur J Hum Genet.
13. Wells D, Kaur K, Grifo J, Glassner M, Taylor JC, Fragouli E, et al. (2014) Clinical utilisation of a rapid low-pass whole genome sequencing technique for the diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos prior to implantation. J Med Genet 51: 553-562. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102497 PMID: 25031024
14. Yang Z, Liu J, Collins GS, Salem SA, Liu X, Lyle SS, et al. (2012) Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study. Mol Cytogenet 5: 24. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-5-24 PMID: 22551456
15. Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Taylor D, Levy B, et al. (2013) In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 100: 100-107 e101. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.056 PMID: 23548942
16. Scott RT Jr., Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, et al. (2013) Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril 100: 697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035 PMID: 23731996
17. Scott KL, Hong KH, Scott RT Jr. (2013) Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. Fertil Steril 100: 608-614. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.004 PMID: 23993663
18. Giorgetti C, Terriou P, Auquier P, Hans E, Spach JL, Salzmann J, et al. (1995) Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod 10: 2427-2431. PMID: 8530679
19. Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB (2004) Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril 81: 551-555. PMID: 15037401
20. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, GPC, che PC, et al. (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Plos Medicine 4: 1623-1627.
21. Mamas T, Gordon A, Brown A, Harper J, Sengupta S (2012) Detection of aneuploidy by array comparative genomic hybridization using cell lines to mimic a mosaic trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil Steril 97: 943-947. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.048 PMID: 22277764
22. Novik V, Moulton EB, Sisson ME, Shrestha SL, Tran KD, Stern HJ, et al. (2014) The accuracy of chromosomal microarray testing for identification of embryonic mosaicism in human blastocysts. Mol Cytogenet 7: 18. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-7-18 PMID: 24581286
23. R-Core-Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing.: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
24. Geraedts J, Montag M, Magli MC, Repping S, Handyside A, Staessen C, et al. (2011) Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results. Hum Reprod 26: 3173-3180. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der294 PMID: 21908463
25. Christopikou D, Tsorva E, Economou K, Shelley P, Davies S, Mastrominas M, et al. (2013) Polar body analysis by array comparative genomic hybridization accurately predicts aneuploidies of maternal meiotic origin in cleavage stage embryos of women of advanced maternal age. Hum Reprod 28: 1426-1434. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det053 PMID: 23477909
26. Capalbo A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Biricik A, Baldi M, Colamaria S, et al. (2013) Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development. Hum Reprod 28: 509-518. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des394 PMID: 23148203
27. Fragouli E, Wells D (2013) Questions about the accuracy of polar body analysis for preimplantation genetic screening. Hum Reprod 28: 1731-1732. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det069 PMID: 23532326
28. Christopikou D, Handyside AH (2013) Questions about the accuracy of polar body analysis for preimplantation genetic screening. Hum Reprod 28: 1732-1733. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det076 PMID: 23532325
29. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Jaroudi S, Sarasa J, Enciso M, et al. (2013) The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Genet 132: 1001-1013. doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1309-0 PMID: 23620267
30. Salvaggio CN, Forman EJ, Garnsey HM, Treff NR, Scott RT Jr. (2014) Polar body based aneuploidy screening is poorly predictive of embryo ploidy and reproductive potential. J Assist Reprod Genet 31: 1221-1226. doi: 10.1007/s10815-014-0293-1 PMID: 25106935
31. Handyside AH, Montag M, Magli MC, Repping S, Harper J, Schmutzler A, et al. (2012) Multiple meiotic errors caused by predivision of chromatids in women of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilisation. Eur J Hum Genet 20: 742-747. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.272 PMID: 22317970
32. Scott RT Jr., Treff NR, Stevens J, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Katz-Jaffe MG, et al. (2012) Delivery of a chromosomally normal child from an oocyte with reciprocal aneuploid polar bodies. J Assist Reprod Genet 29: 533-537. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9746-6 PMID: 22460080
33. Forman EJ, Treff NR, Stevens JM, Garnsey HM, Katz-Jaffe MG, Scott RT Jr, et al. (2013) Embryos whose polar bodies contain isolated reciprocal chromosome aneuploidy are almost always euploid. Hum Reprod 28: 502-508. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des393 PMID: 23169867
34. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Goodall NN, Sanchez-Garcia JF, Colls P, Wells D (2011) The cytogenetics of polar bodies: insights into female meiosis and the diagnosis of aneuploidy. Mol Hum Reprod 17: 286-295. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gar024 PMID: 21493685
35. Hunt PA, Hassold TJ (2002) Sex matters in meiosis. Science 296: 2181-2183. PMID: 12077403
36. Montag M, Koster M, Strowitzki T, Toth B (2013) Polar body biopsy. Fertil Steril 100: 603-607. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.053 PMID: 23796365
37. Fonseka KG, Griffin DK (2011) Is there a paternal age effect for aneuploidy? Cytogenet Genome Res 133: 280-291. doi: 10.1159/000322816 PMID: 21212646
38. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S (2011) Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update 17: 454-466. doi: 10.1093/humupd/ dmr003 PMID: 21531751
39. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Wells D (2011) First births after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of structural chromosome abnormalities using comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis. Hum Reprod 26: 1560-1574. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der068 PMID: 21447693
40. Edgar DH, Bourne H, Speirs AL, McBain JC (2000) A quantitative analysis of the impact of cryopreservation on the implantation potential of human early cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod 15: 175-179. PMID: 10611209
41. Cohen J, Wells D, Munne S (2007) Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil Steril 87: 496-503. PMID: 17141767
42. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, et al. (2009) Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med 15: 577-583. doi: 10.1038/nm.1924 PMID: 19396175
43. Rabinowitz M, Ryan A, Gemelos G, Hill M, Baner J, Cinnioglu C, et al. (2012) Origins and rates of aneuploidy in human blastomeres. Fertil Steril 97: 395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.034 PMID: 22195772
44. Pantos K, Athanasiou V, Stefanidis K, Stavrou D, Vaxevanoglou T, Chronopoulou M (1999) Influence of advanced age on the blastocyst development rate and pregnancy rate in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 71: 1144-1146. PMID: 10360925
45. Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST (2002) Influence of patient age on the growth and transfer of blastocyst-stage embryos. Fertil Steril 77: 700-705. PMID: 11937119
46. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, et al. (2011) Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril 95: 953-958. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010 PMID: 20971462
47. Fragouli E, Wells D, Thornhill A, Serhal P, Faed MJ, Harper JC, et al. (2006) Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies. Hum Reprod 21: 2319-2328. PMID: 16704993
48. Munne S (2012) Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy and translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Curr Genomics 13: 463-470. doi: 10.2174/138920212802510457 PMID: 23448851
49. Harton GL, Munne S, Surrey M, Grifo J, Kaplan B, McCulloh DH, et al. (2013) Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril 100: 1695-1703. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.2002 PMID: 24034939
50. Hengstschlager M, Feichtinger W (2005) [The first preimplantation diagnosis in Austria]. Wien Klin Wochenschr 117: 725-727. PMID: 16416352
51. Montag M, van der Ven K, Rosing B, van der Ven H (2009) Polar body biopsy: a viable alternative to preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. Reprod Biomed Online 18 Suppl 1: 6-11. PMID: 19281658
52. Hou Y, Fan W, Yan L, Li R, Lian Y, Huang J, et al. (2013) Genome analyses of single human oocytes. Cell 155: 1492-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.040 PMID: 24360273
53. Ferraretti AP, Magli MC, Kopcow L, Gianaroli L (2004) Prognostic role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in assisted reproductive technology outcome. Hum Reprod 19: 694-699. PMID: 14998972