Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 95, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 953-958

  Gutiérrez Mateo, Cristina ^a   Colls, Pere ^a   Sánchez García, Jorge ^a   Escudero, Tomas ^a   Prates, Renata ^a   Ketterson, Kelly ^a   Wells, Dagan ^a   Munné, Santiago ^a  

^a Reprogenetics LLC   (United States)

Author keywords

aneuploidy; array CGH; CGH; embryos; PGD; PGS; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BLASTOMERE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MICROARRAY COMPARATIVE GENOMIC MICROARRAY HYBRIDIZATION; POLYPLOIDY; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; BIOPSY; BLASTOCYST; BLASTOMERES; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MATERNAL AGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;

EID: 79951956230     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bielanska M, Tan SL, Ao A. Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome. Hum Reprod 2002; 17:413-9. (Pubitemid 34168450)
2. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Lappi M, Ruberti A, Farfalli V. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil Steril 2007;87:534-41. (Pubitemid 46385969)
3. Munne S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rates, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 1995;64:382-91.
4. Munne S, Chen S, Colls P, Garrisi J, Zheng X, Cekleniak N, et al. Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;14:628-34.
5. Colls P, Goodall N, Zheng X, Munne S. Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy by testing 12 chromosomes. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;19:532-8.
6. Jansen RP, Bowman MC, de Boer KA, Leigh DA, Lieberman DB, McArthur SJ. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy. Hum Reprod 2008;23:1476-8. (Pubitemid 351809712)
7. Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Ilkevitch Y, Verlinsky Y. Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis for agerelated aneuploidies. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;6:54-9. (Pubitemid 36857119)
8. Voullaire L, Wilton L, Slater H, Williamson R. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization. Prenatal Diagnosis 1999;19: 846-51. (Pubitemid 29438175)
9. Wells D, Delhanty JDA. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Molecular Human Reproduction 2000;6:1055-62.
10. Fragouli E, Escalona A, Gutierrez-Mateo C, Tormasi S, Alfarawati S, Sepulveda S, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of oocytes and first polar bodies from young donors. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;19:228-37.
11. Sher G, Keskintepe L, Keskintepe M, Ginsburg M, Maassarani G, Yakut T, et al. Oocyte karyotyping by comparative genomic hybridization [correction of hybrydization] provides a highly reliable method for selecting "competent" embryos, markedly improving in vitro fertilization outcome: a multiphase study. Fertil Steril 2007;87:1033-40.
12. Fragouli E, Katz-Jaffe M, Alfarawati S, Stevens J, Colls P, Goodall NN, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening of polar bodies and blastocysts from couples experiencing repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2009;94:875-87.
13. Schoolcraft WB, Fragouli E, Stevens J, Munne S, Katz-Jaffe MG, Wells D. Clinical application of comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril 2009;94:1700-6.
14. Kuwayama M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology 2007;67:73-80. (Pubitemid 44854144)
15. Hellani A, Abu-Amero K, Azouri J, El-Akoum S. Successful pregnancies after application of array-comparative genomic hybridization in PGS-aneuploidy screening. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:841-7.
16. Hu DG, Webb G, Hussey N. Aneuploidy detection in single cells using DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod 2004;10: 283-9. (Pubitemid 38456034)
17. Le Caignec C, Spits C, Sermon K, De Rycke M, Thienpont B, Debrock S, et al. Single-cell chromosomal imbalances detection by array CGH. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:e68.
18. Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B, Thornhill AR, Affara NA, Shaw MA, et al. Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes. J Med Genet; 2010 [Epub ahead of print].
19. Johnson DS, Gemelos G, Baner J, Ryan A, Cinnioglu C, Banjevic M, et al. Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1066-75.
20. Treff N, Su J, Tao X, Miller K, Levy B, Scott R. A novel single-cell DNA fingerprinting method successfully distinguishes sibling human embryos. Fertil Steril 94:477-484.
21. Heinrich U, Rost I, Brown A, Gordon T, Haan N, Massie J. Array comparative genomic hybridisation in clinical diagnostics: principles and applications. J Lab Med 2009;33:255-66.
22. Sismani C, Kitsiou-Tzeli S, Ioannides M, Christodoulou C, Anastasiadou V, Stylianidou G, et al. Cryptic genomic imbalances in patients with de novo or familial apparently balanced translocations and abnormal phenotype. Mol Cytogenet 2008;1:15.
23. Fiegler H, Redon R, Andrews D, Scott C, Andrews R, Carder C, et al. Accurate and reliable high-throughput detection of copy number variation in the human genome. Genome Res 2006;16:1566-74. (Pubitemid 44878495)
24. Fragouli E, Wells D, Thornhill A, Serhal P, Faed MJ, Harper JC, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies. Hum Reprod 2006;21:2319-28. (Pubitemid 44530606)
25. Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Benet J, Wells D, Colls P, Bermudez MG, Sanchez-Garcia JF, et al. Aneuploidy study of human oocytes first polar body comparative genomic hybridization and metaphase II fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2859-68. (Pubitemid 40028959)
26. Gutierrez-Mateo C, Wells D, Benet J, Sanchez-Garcia JF, Bermudez MG, Belil I, et al. Reliability of comparative genomic hybridization to detect chromosome abnormalities in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2118-25. (Pubitemid 39236482)
27. Munne S, Bahce M, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Marquez C, Velilla E, et al. Differences in chromosome susceptibility to aneuploidy and survival to first trimester. Reprod Biomed Online 2004;8:81-90. (Pubitemid 38100694)
28. Colls P, Escudero T, Cekleniak N, Sadowy S, Cohen J, Munne S. Increased efficiency of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for infertility using "no result rescue". Fertil Steril 2007;88:53-61.
29. Magli MC, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Morrison L, Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, et al. Double locus analysis of chromosome 21 for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Prenat Diagn 2001;21:1080-5. (Pubitemid 34056193)
30. Treff N, Su J, Kasabwala N, Tao X, Miller K, Scott R. Robust embryo identification using first polar body single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2453-5.
31. Sart Cors Online. All SART member clinics: clinic summary report. Available at: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR-PublicMultYear.aspx? ClinicPKID=0. Last accessed October 18, 2010.
32. Baart EB, Van Opstal D, Los FJ, Fauser BC, Martini E. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5. Hum Reprod 2004;19:685-93. (Pubitemid 38344536)
33. Coulam CB, Jeyendran RS, Fiddler M, Pergament E. Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective. J Assist Reprod Genet 2007;24:37-41. (Pubitemid 46213650)
34. Li M, Marin DeUgarte C, Surrey M, Danzer H, DeCherney A, Hill DL. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization reanalysis of day-6 human blastocysts diagnosed with aneuploidy on day 3. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1395-400. (Pubitemid 41571886)
35. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim/176270#176270. Last accessed October 20, 2010.
36. Hassold T, Chiu D, Yamane J. Parental origin of autosomal trisomies. Ann Hum Genet 1984;48:129-44. (Pubitemid 14004310)
37. Martin RH, Rademaker A. The frequency of aneuploidy among individual chromosomes in 6821 human sperm chromosome complements. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1990;53:103-7. (Pubitemid 20189227)
38. Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Marquez C, Cohen J. Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;4:223-32.