Life of p: 16 Years of statistics on the italian journal of psychology;Vita di p: 16 anni di statistiche sul gip

Giornale Italiano di Psicologia

Volumn 42, Issue 1-2, 2015, Pages 303-325

  Pastore, Massimiliano ^a   Nucci, Massimo ^a   Bobbio, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Effect size; Norme APA; Null hypothesis significance testing; P value

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931838429     PISSN: 03905349     EISSN: 26122413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1421/79851     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. AGNOLI F., FURLAN S. (2009). I cambiamenti nella verifica di ipotesi: statistiche migliori per decisioni migliori. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 36(4), 849-882.
2. ALTOÉ G., PASTORE M. (2013). L'effetto della numerosità sul significato di un risultato statisticamente significativo. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 40(2), 367-376.
3. th ed.). Washington, D. C.: Author.
4. th ed.). Washington, D. C.: Author.
5. th ed.). Washington, D. C.: Author.
6. BARKER M., WICHERTS J. M. (2011). The (mis) reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 666-678.
7. BALBONI G., CUBELLI R. (2009). Convergenza delle evidenze e molteplicità delle ipotesi: la verifica dell'ipotesi nulla nella ricerca psicologica. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 36(4), 883-898.
8. BRAVER S. L., THOEMMES F. J., ROSENTHAL R. (2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 333-342.
9. BURNHAM K. P., ANDERSON D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261-304.
10. BURNHAM K. P., ANDERSON D. R., HUYVAERT K. P. (2011). AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: Some background, observations, and comparisons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(1), 23-35.
11. nd ed.). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
12. COHEN J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
13. CUMMING G. (2008). Replication and p intervals: p values predict the future only vaguely, but confidence intervals do much better. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 286-300.
14. CUMMING G., FIDLER F., LEONARD M., KALINOWSKI P., CHRISTIANSEN A., KLEINIG A., LO J., MCMENAMIN N., WILSON S. (2007). Statistical reform in psychology: Is anything changing? Psychological Science, 18(3), 230-232.
15. DI NUOVO S. (2009). Cosa significa significativo? Ovvero: ci sono alternative all'ipotesi alternativa? Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 36(4), 899-911.
16. DIENES Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 274-290.
17. FANELLI D. (2012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90(3), 891-904.
18. FEINERER I., HORNIK K., MEYER D. (2008). Text mining infrastructure in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(5), 1-54.
19. FIDLER F. (2005). From statistical significance to effect estimation: Statistical reform in psychology, medicine and ecology. University of Melbourne, Department of History and Philosophy of Science. Available at: http://books. google.it/books?id=yjiCNAAACAAJ.
20. FIDLER F., GEOFF C., MARK B., NEIL T. (2004). Statistical reform in medicine, psychology and ecology. Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(5), 615-630.
21. FINCH S., CUMMING G., WILLIAMS J., PALMER L., GRIFFITH E., ALDERS C., ANDERSON J., GOODMAN O. (2004). Reform of statistical inference in psychology: The case of Memory & Cognition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), 312-324.
22. FOX J. (2008). Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. FRANCIS G. (2013). Replication, statistical consistency, and publication bias. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57(5), 153-169.
24. nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. GELFAND A. E., SMITH A. F. M. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(410), 398-409.
26. GELMAN A. (2013a). Interrogating p-values. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57(5), 188-189.
27. GELMAN A. (2013b). P values and statistical practice. Epidemiology, 24(1), 69-72.
28. GEMAN S., GEMAN D. (1984). Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721-741.
29. GIGERENZER G., MAREWSKI J. N. (2015). Surrogate science the idol of a universal method for scientific inference. Journal of Management, 41(2), 421-440.
30. HEDGES L. V., OLKIN I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
31. HOEKSTRA R., MOREY R. D., ROUDER J. N., WAGENMAKERS E.-J. (2014). Robust misinterpretation of confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1157-1164.
32. HUBBARD R., LINDSAY R. M. (2008). Why P values are not a useful measure of evidence in statistical significance testing. Theory & Psychology, 18(1), 69-88.
33. IOANNIDIS J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), 696-701.
34. JOHN L. K., LOEWENSTEIN G., PRELEC D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524-532.
35. JOHNSON V. E. (2013). Revised standards for statistical evidence. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America, 110(48), 19313-19317.
36. KLINE R. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
37. KLUGKIST I., VAN WESEL F., BULLENS J. (2011). Do we know what we test and do we test what we want to know? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(6), 550-560.
38. KRUSCHKE J. K. (2010). What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 293-300.
39. KRUSCHKE J. K. (2011). Doing bayesian data analysis. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
40. KRUSCHKE J. K. (2013). Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 573-603.
41. LAKENS D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.
42. LAKENS D., EVERS E. R. K. (2014). Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability: Practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 278-292.
43. LEDGERWOOD A. (2014). Introduction to the special section on advancing our methods and practices. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 275-277.
44. LJUNG G. M., BOX G. E. P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65(2), 297-303.
45. MANER J. K. (2014). Let's put our money where our mouth is: If authors are to change their ways, reviewers (and editors) must change with them. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 343-351.
46. MASICAMPO E. J., LALANDE D. R. (2012). A peculiar prevalence of p values just below.05. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(11), 2271-2279.
47. MAXWELL S. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9(2), 147-163.
48. MOREY R. D., ROUDER J. N. (2014). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs (R package version 0.9.9).
49. MOREY R. D., ROUDER J. N., PRATTE M. S., SPECKMAN P. L. (2011). Using MCMC chain outputs to efficiently estimate Bayes factors. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(5), 368-378.
50. MORRIS J., GARDNER M. (1988). Calculating confidence-intervals for relative risks (odds ratios) and standardized ratios and rates. British Medical Journal, 296(6632), 1313-1316.
51. PASTORE M. (2009). I limiti dell'approccio NHST e l'alternativa Bayesiana. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 36(4), 925-938.
52. PERUGINI M. (2014a). Ciö che non uccide, rende più forte: La reazione della psicologia alla crisi di credibilità. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 41(1), 127-138.
53. PERUGINI M. (2014b). La crisi internazionale di credibilità della psicologia come un'opportunità di crescita: Problemi e possibili soluzioni. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 41(1), 23-46.
54. PERUGINI M., GALLUCCI M., COSTANTINI G. (2014). Safeguard power as a protection against imprecise power estimates. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 319-332.
55. R CORE TEAM (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.r-project.org.
56. RIGBY R. A., STASINOPOULOS D. M. (2005). Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape, (with discussion). Applied Statistics, 54(3), 507-554.
57. ROSENTHAL R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. SAGARIN B. J., AMBLER J. K., LEE E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293-304.
59. SCARGLE J. D. (2000). Publication bias: The «file-drawer» problem in scientific inference. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 14(1), 91-106.
60. SCHIMMACK U. (2012). The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 551-566.
61. SCHOOLER J. (2011). Unpublished results hide the decline effect. Nature, 470(7335), 437.
62. SELLKE T., BAYARRI M. J., BERGER J. O. (2001). Calibration of p values for testing precise null hypotheses. American Statistician, 55(1), 62-71.
63. SHEA C. (2011). Fraud scandal fuels debate over practices of social psychology. Chronicle of Higher Education. Available at: http://chronicle.com/article/As-Dutch-Research-Scandal/129746.
64. SIMMONS J. P., NELSON L. D., SIMONSOHN U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359-1366.
65. SIMONSOHN U., NELSON L. D., SIMMONS J. P. (2014). P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534.
66. STANLEY D. J., SPENCE J. R. (2014). Expectations for replications: Are yours realistic? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 305-318.
67. STERNE J. A., SMITH G. D. (2001). Sifting the evidence - what's wrong with significance tests? Physical Therapy, 81(8), 1464-1469.
68. UMILTÀ C. (2014). Le frodi scientifiche si possono perpetrare anche con l'inferenza statistica. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 41(1), 117-120.
69. WAGENMAKERS E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 779-804.
70. WILKINSON L., TASK FORCE ON STATISTICAL INFERENCE (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals - Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594-604.
71. YOUNG N. S., IOANNIDIS J. P. A., AL-UBAYDI O. (2008). Why current publication practices may distort science. PLoS Medicine, 5(10), 1418-1422.
72. ZILIAK S. T., MCCLOSKEY D. N. (2008). The cult of statistical significance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.