Revised standards for statistical evidence

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 48, 2013, Pages 19313-19317

  Johnson, Valen E ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

BAYES THEOREM; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84888364305     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313476110     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Zimmer C (April 16, 2012) A sharp rise in retractions prompts calls for reform. NY Times, Science Section.
2. Naik G (December 2, 2011) Scientists' elusive goal: Reproducing study results. Wall Street Journal, Health Section.
3. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50(4): 1088-1101.
4. Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56(2): 455-463.
5. Ioannidis JP (2005) Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA 294(2): 218-228.
6. Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA (2007) An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clin Trials 4(3): 245-253.
7. Miller J (2009) What is the probability of replicating a statistically significant effect? Psychon Bull Rev 16(4): 617-640.
8. Francis G (2012) Evidence that publication bias contaminated studies relating social class and unethical behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(25):E1587, author reply E1588.
9. Simonsohn U, Nelson LD, Simmons JP (2013) P-curve: A key to the file drawer. J Exp Psychol Gen, in press.
10. Fisher RA (1926) StatisticalMethods for ResearchWorkers (Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh).
11. Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of Probability (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford), 3rd Ed.
12. Kass RE, Raftery AE (1995) Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 90(430): 773-795.
13. Berger JO, Selke T (1987) Testing a point null hypothesis: The irreconcilability of p values and evidence. J Am Stat Assoc 82(397): 112-122.
14. Berger JO, Delampady M (1987) Testing precise hypotheses. Stat Sci 2(3): 317-335.
15. Edwards W, Lindman H, Savage LJ (1963) Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychol Rev 70(3): 193-242.
16. Raftery AE (1995) Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol 25: 111-163.
17. Rouder JN, Speckman PL, Sun D, Morey RD, Iverson G (2009) Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychon Bull Rev 16(2): 225-237.
18. Wagenmakers E-J, Grünwald P (2006) A Bayesian perspective on hypothesis testing: A comment on Killeen (2005). Psychol Sci 17(7):641-642, author reply 643-644.
19. Wagenmakers E-J (2007) A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychon Bull Rev 14(5): 779-804.
20. Wetzels R, et al. (2011) Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspect Psychol Sci 6(3): 291-298.
21. Johnson VE (2013) Uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests. Ann Stat 41(4): 1716-1741.