Let's Put Our Money Where Our Mouth Is: If Authors Are to Change Their Ways, Reviewers (and Editors) Must Change With Them

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 343-351

  Maner, Jon K ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

manuscript evaluation; methodology; replication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899824267     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691614528215     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bem D.The compleat academic: A career guide. Darley J. M.Zanna M. P.Roediger H. L., ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004:185-219.
2. Braver S. L.,Thoemmes F. J.,Rosenthal R.Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:333-342.
3. Cohen J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988:.
4. Cumming G.The new statistics: Why and how.Psychological Science. 2014;25:7-29.
5. Eich E.Business not as usual.Psychological Science. 2014;25:3-6.
6. Ferguson C. J.,Heene M.A vast graveyard of undead theories: Publication bias and psychological science's aversion to the null.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:555-561.
7. Francis G.Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2012;19:151-156.
8. Giner-Sorolla R.Science or art? How aesthetic standards grease the way through the publication bottleneck but undermine science.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:562-571.
9. Higgins E. T.Increasingly complex but less interesting articles: Scientific progress or regulatory problem?.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1992;18:489-492.
10. John L. K.,Loewenstein G.,Prelec D.Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.Psychological Science. 2012;23:524-532.
11. Kerr N. L.HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1998;2:196-217.
12. Lakens D.,Evers E.Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability: Practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:278-292.
13. LeBel E. P.,Campbell L.Heightened sensitivity to temperature cues in individuals with high anxious attachment: Real or elusive phenomenon?.Psychological Science. 2013;24:2128-2130.
14. Murayama K.,Pekrun R.,Fiedler K.Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2013;:.
15. Nelson L. D.,Simmons J. P.,Simonsohn U.Let's publish.fewer Psychological Inquiry. 2012;23:291-293.
16. Nosek B. A.,Bar-Anan Y.Scientific utopia: Opening scientific communication.Psychological Inquiry. 2012;23:217-243.
17. Nosek B. A.,Spies J. R.,Motyl M.Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:615-631.
18. Perugini M.,Gallucci M.,Costantini G.Safeguard power as a protection against imprecise power estimates.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:319-332.
19. Popper K.Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London, England: Routledge; 1963:.
20. Schimmack U.The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.Psychological Methods. 2012;17:551-566.
21. Simmons J. P.,Nelson L. D.,Simonsohn U.False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science. 2011;22:1359-1366.
22. Simonsohn U.It does not follow: Evaluating the one-off publication bias critiques by Francis (2012a, 2012b, 2012c, 2012d, 2012e, in press).Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:597-599.
23. Stanley D. J.,Spence J. R.Expectations for replications: Are yours realistic?.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:305-318.
24. Wagenmakers E. J.,Wetzels R.,Borsboom D.,van der Maas H.Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011).Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;100:426-432.
25. Zwaan R. A.Psychological Science. 2014 2013;25:305-307.