Introduction to the Special Section on Advancing Our Methods and Practices

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 275-277

  Ledgerwood, Alison ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899867761     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691614529448     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bakker M.,van Dijk A.,Wicherts J. M.The rules of the game called psychological science.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:543-554.
2. Begley C. G.,Ellis L. M.Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research.Nature. 2012;483:531-533.
3. Bem D. J.Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2011;100:407-425.
4. Braver S. L.,Thoemmes F. J.,Rosenthal R.Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:333-342.
5. Button K. S.,Ioannidis J. P.,Mokrysz C.,Nosek B. A.,Flint J.,Robinson E. S.,Munafò M. R.Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013;14:365-376.
6. Cesario J.Priming, replication, and the hardest science.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:40-48.
7. ChambersC.MunafoM. (2013, June). Trust in science would be improved by study pre-registration. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2013/jun/05/trust-in-science-study-pre-registration.
8. Cohen J.A power primer.Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:155-159.
9. Eich E.Business not as usual.Psychological Science. 2014;25:3-6.
10. Fanelli D.Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries.Scientometrics. 2012;90:891-904.
11. Fiedler K.,Kutzner F.,Krueger J. I.The long way from a-error control to validity proper: Problems with a short-sighted false-positive debate.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:661-669.
12. Greenwald A. G.Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin. 1975;82:1-20.
13. Ioannidis J. P.Why most published research findings are false.PLoS Medicine. 2005;2 (8): e124.
14. John L.,Loewenstein G.,Prelec D.Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling.Psychological Science. 2012;23:524-532.
15. Lakens D.,Evers E.Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability: Practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies.Perspectives in Psychological Science. 2014;9:278-292.
16. LeBel E. P.,Borsboom D.,Giner-Sorolla R.,Hasselman F.,Peters K. R.,Ratliff K. A.,Smith C. T.PsychDisclosure.org: Grassroots support for reforming reporting standards in psychology.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013;8:424-432.
17. Ledgerwood A.,Sherman J. W.Short, sweet, and problematic? The rise of the short report in psychological science.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:60-66.
18. LehrerJ. (2010, December13). The truth wears off: Is there something wrong with the scientific method?The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://jackmccallum.com/The%20Truth%20Wears%20Off--Scientific%20Method%20Error.pdf.
19. Maner J. K.Let's put our money where our mouth is: If authors are to change their ways, reviewers (and editors) must change with them.Perspectives in Psychological Science. 2014;9:343-351.
20. Maxwell S. E.The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies.Psychological Methods. 2004;9:147-163.
21. McNutt M.Reproducibility.Science. 2014;343:229.
22. Moonesinghe R.,Khoury M. J.,Janssens A. C. J.Most published research findings are false-But a little replication goes a long way.PLoS Medicine. 2007;4:e28.
23. Murayama K.,Pekrun R.,Fiedler K.Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2013;:.
24. Nosek B. A.,Spies J. R.,Motyl M.Scientific utopia II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:615-631.
25. Open Science Framework. (2014). Badges to acknowledge open practices. Retrieved from https://osf.io/tvyxz/wiki/view/.
26. Pashler H.,Wagenmakers E. J.Editors' introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence?.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:528-530.
27. Perugini M.,Gallucci M.,Costantini G.Safeguard power as a protection against imprecise power estimates.Perspectives in Psychological Science. 2014;9:319-332.
28. PSPB. (2014). Manuscript submission guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.spsp.org/?page=PSPB.
29. Rosenthal R.The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin. 1979;86:638-641.
30. Rosenthal R.,Rubin D. B.Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies.Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 1978;1:377-386.
31. Sagarin B. J.,Ambler J. K.,Lee E. M.An ethical approach to peeking at data.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:293-304.
32. Sears D. O.College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:515-530.
33. Simmons J. P.,Nelson L. D.,Simonsohn U.False positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science. 2011;22:1359-1366.
34. Spellman B. A. Presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychology; 2013Berkeley, CA; 2013.
35. Stanley D.,Spence J.Expectations for replications: Are yours realistic?.Perspectives in Psychological Science. 2014;9:305-318.
36. Stroebe W.,Strack F.The alleged crisis and the illusion of exact replication.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:59-71.
37. Tilburg University. (2011). Interim report regarding the breach of scientific integrity committed by Prof. D.A. Stapel (pp. 1-21). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Author. Retrieved from http://www.tilburguniversity.edu/upload/547aa461-6cd1-48cd-801b-61c434a73f79_interim-report.pdf.
38. Vul E.,Harris C.,Winkielman P.,Pashler H.Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2009;4:274-290.
39. Wicker A. W.Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects.Journal of Social Issues. 1969;25:41-78.