Erratum: Expectations for replications: Are yours realistic? [Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, (2014) 305-318, DOI 10.1177/1745691614528518];Expectations for Replications: Are Yours Realistic?

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 305-318

  Stanley, David J ^a   Spence, Jeffrey R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

individual differences; meta analysis; methodology; reliability; replication; scientific

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899842016     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691614542787     Document Type: Erratum

References (39)

1. Asendorpf J. B.,Conner M.,De Fruyt F.,De Houwer J.,Denissen J. J. A.,Fiedler K., Wicherts J. M.Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology.European Journal of Personality. 2013;27:108-119.
2. Bonanno G. A.,Jost J. T.Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks.Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2006;28:311-323.
3. Borenstein M.,Hedges L. V.,Higgins J. P. T.,Rothstein H. R.Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, England: Wiley; 2009:.
4. Braver S. L.,Thoemmes F. J.,Rosenthal R.Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:333-342.
5. Button K. S.,Ioannidis J. P. A.,Mokrysz C.,Nosek B. A.,Flint J.,Robinson E. S. J.,Munafò M. R.Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013;14:365-376.
6. Chan M. E.,Arvey R. D.Meta-analysis and the development of knowledge.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:79-92.
7. Charles E. P.The correction for attenuation due to measurement error: Clarifying concepts and creating confidence sets.Psychological Methods. 2005;10:206-226.
8. Cooper H.,Hedges L. V.,Valentine J. C.The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2009:.
9. Cunningham G. K.Educational and psychological measurement. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1986:.
10. Fanelli D.Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries.Scientometrics. 2012;90:891-904.
11. Funder D. C.,Levine J. M.,Mackie D. M.,Morf C. C.,Sansone C.,Vazire S.,West S. G.Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: Recommendations for research and educational practice.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2014;18:3-12.
12. Funder D. C.Notice: PSPB articles by authors with retracted articles at PSPB or other journals: Stapel, Smeesters, and Sanna.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2014;40:132-135.
13. Glass G. V.Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research.Educational Researcher. 1976;5:3-8.
14. Glass G. V.,McGaw B.,Smith M. L.Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1981:.
15. Hedges L.,Olkin I.Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1985:.
16. Hunter J. E.,Schmidt F. L.Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. 2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2004:.
17. IoannidisJ. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. Retrieved from http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020124.
18. John L. K.,Loewenstein G.,Prelec D.Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.Psychological Science. 2012;23:524-532.
19. Lance C. E.,Butts M. M.,Michels L. C.The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say?.Organizational Research Methods. 2006;9:202-220.
20. Makel M.,Plucker J.,Hegarty B.Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur?.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:537-542.
21. Maner J.Let's put our money where our mouth is: If authors are to change their ways, reviewers (and editors) must change with them.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:343-351.
22. Markus H. R.,Kitayama S.Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.Psychological Review. 1991;98:224-253.
23. Marszalek J. M.,Barber C.,Kohlhart J.,Holmes C. B.Sample size in psychological research over the past 30 years.Perceptual & Motor Skills. 2011;112:331-348.
24. Nunnally J. C.,Bernstein I. H.Psychometric theory. 1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994:.
25. Pashler H.,Wagenmakers E. J.Editors' introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence?.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:528-530.
26. Perugini M.,Gallucci M.,Costantini G.Safeguard power as a protection against imprecise power estimates.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2014;9:319-332.
27. R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org/.
28. Reproducibility Project. (2013). Retrieved from https://osf.io/ezcuj/wiki/home/.
29. Richard F. D.,Bond C. F.,Stokes-Zoota J. J.One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described.Review of General Psychology. 2003;7:331-363.
30. Schmidt F. L.,Hunter J. E.Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1977;62:529-540.
31. Schwartz S. H.,Rubel T.Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;89:1010-1028.
32. Simmons J. P.,Nelson L. D.,Simonsohn U.False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.Psychological Science. 2011;22:1359-1366.
33. Spearman C.The proof and measurement of association between two things.American Journal of Psychology. 1904;15:72-101.
34. Spearman C.Correlation calculated with faulty data.British Journal of Psychology. 1910;3:271-295.
35. Stroebe W.,Postmes T.,Spears R.Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:670-688.
36. Tressoldi P. E.Replication unreliability in psychology: Elusive phenomena or "elusive" statistical power.Frontiers in Psychology. 2012;3:1-5.
37. YongE. (2012, May16). Replication studies: Bad copy. Nature. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/replication-studies-bad-copy-1.10634.
38. Zimmerman D. W.Correction for attenuation with biased reliability estimates and correlated errors in populations and samples.Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2007;67:920-939.
39. Zimmerman D. W.,Williams R. H.Validity coefficients and correlated errors in test theory.Journal of Experimental Education. 1977;45:4-9.