Ciò che non uccide, rende più forte: La reazione della psicologia alla crisi di credibilità

Giornale Italiano di Psicologia

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 127-136

  Perugini, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906343108     PISSN: 03905349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1421/77209     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Asendorpf J.B., Conner M., De Fruyt F., De Houwer J., Denissen J.J.A., Fiedler K., Fiedler S., Funder D.C., Kliegl R., Nosek B.A., Perugini, M., Roberts B.W., Schmitt M., Aken M.A.G., Weber H., Wicherts J.M. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108-119.
2. Brandt M.J., Ijzerman H., Dijksterhuis A., Farach F.J., Geller J., Giner-Sorolla R., Grange J.A., Perugini M., Spies J., van 't Veer A. (2014). The Replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217-224.
3. Braver S.L., Thoemmes F.J., Rosenthal R. (2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 333-342.
4. Cumming G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7-29.
5. Eich E. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25, 3-6.
6. Ingre M. (2013). Why small low-powered studies are worse than large high-powered studies and how to protect against «trivial» findings in research: Comment on Friston (2012). NeuroImage, 81, 496-498.
7. Kelley K., Rausch J.R. (2006). Sample size planning for the standardized mean difference: Accuracy in parameter estimation via narrow confidence intervals. Psychological Methods, 11, 363-385.
8. John L.K., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23, 524-532.
9. Lakens D., Evers E.R.K. (2014). Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability: Practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 278-292.
10. Ledgerwood A. (2014). Introduction to the special section on advancing our methods and practices. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 275-277.
11. Maxwell S.E. (2004). The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9, 147-163.
12. Maxwell S.E., Kelley K., Rausch J.R. (2008). Sample size planning for statistical power and accuracy in parameter estimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 537-563.
13. Murayama K., Pekrun R., Fiedler K. (2014). Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false positive rates. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 107-118.
14. Nosek B.A., Lakens D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results. Social Psychology, 45, 137-141.
15. Perugini M., Gallucci M., Costantini G. (2014). Safeguard power analysis as a protection against imprecise power estimates. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 319-332.
16. Schönbrodt F.D., Zehetleitner M., Wagenmakers E.J., Perugini M. (2014). Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes Factors: A practical and powerful approach. Manoscritto in esame per la pubblicazione.
17. Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105-110.
18. Yarkoni T. (2009). Big correlations in little studies: Inflated fMRI correlations reflect low statistical power. Commentary on Vul et al. (2009). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 294-298.