A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 586-601

  Schultz, T W ^a   Amcoff, P ^b   Berggren, E ^c   Gautier, F ^d   Klaric, M ^b   Knight, D J ^e   Mahony, C ^f   Schwarz, M ^g   White, A ^h   Cronin, M T D ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b Cosmetics Europe ^*  (Belgium)

^c JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^d L ORÉAL RECHERCHE   (France)

^e EUROPEAN CHEMICALS AGENCY   (Finland)

^f PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^h UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chemical analogue identification; OECD; Prediction; REACH; Read across; Regulatory acceptance; Similarity; Toxicity; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

ORGANIC COMPOUND; DANGEROUS GOODS;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTER MODEL; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG BIOAVAILABILITY; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; DRUG EXCRETION; DRUG METABOLISM; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; READ ACROSS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY TESTING; TOXICOKINETICS; VALIDATION PROCESS; XENOBIOTIC METABOLISM; CHEMICAL SAFETY; DANGEROUS GOODS; PROCEDURES; TOXICITY; UNCERTAINTY;

CHEMICAL SAFETY; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84931291670     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ball N., Bartels M., Budinsky R., Klapacz J., Hays S., Kirman C., Patlewicz G. The challenge of using read-across within the EU REACH regulatory framework; how much uncertainty is too much? Dipropylene glycol methyl ether acetate, an exemplary case study. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 68:212-221.
2. Bemis G.W., Murcko M.A. The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39:2887-2893.
3. Berggren, E., Amcoff, P., Benigni, R., Blackburn, K. Carney, E. Cronin, M., Deluyker, H., Gautier, F., Judson, R.S., Kass, G.E.N., Keller, D., Knight, D., Lilienblum, W., Mahony, C., Rusyn, I., Schultz, T., Schwarz, M., Schüürman, G., White, A., Burton, J., Lostia, A., Munn, S., Worth, A., 2015. Chemical safety assessment using read-across: How can novel testing methods strengthen evidence base for decision-making? Environ. Health Perspect., in press.
4. Blackburn K., Bjerke D., Daston G., Felter S., Mahony C., Naciff J., Robison S., Wu S. Case studies to test: a framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2011, 60:120-135.
5. Blackburn K., Stuard S.B. A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 68:353-362.
6. Commission of the European Communities (EC) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union 2006, L 396/1 of 30.12.2006.
7. Cronin M.T.D. An introduction to chemical grouping, categories and read-across to predict toxicity. Chemical Toxicity Prediction: Category Formation and Read-Across Applications 2013, 1-29. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge. M.T.D. Cronin, J.C. Madden, S.J. Enoch, D.W. Roberts (Eds.).
8. Cronin M.T.D. Evaluation of categories and read-across for toxicity prediction allowing for regulatory acceptance. Chemical Toxicity Prediction: Category Formation and Read-Across Applications 2013, 155-167. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge. M.T.D. Cronin, J.C. Madden, S.J. Enoch, D.W. Roberts (Eds.).
9. Chemical Toxicity Prediction: Category Formation and Read-Across Applications 2013, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge. M.T.D. Cronin, J.C. Madden, S.J. Enoch, D.W. Roberts (Eds.).
10. Dimitrov S., Mekenyan O. An introduction to read-across for the prediction of effects of chemicals. In Silico Toxicology: Principles and Applications 2010, 372-384. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge. M.T.D. Cronin, J.C. Madden (Eds.).
11. Enoch S.J., Przybylak K.R., Cronin M.T.D. Category formation case studies. Chemical Toxicity Prediction: Category Formation and Read-Across Applications 2013, 127-154. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge. M.T.D. Cronin, J.C. Madden, S.J. Enoch, D.W. Roberts (Eds.).
12. Enoch S.J., Roberts D.W. Approaches for grouping chemicals into categories. Chemical Toxicity Prediction: Category Formation and Read-Across Applications 2013, 30-43. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge. M.T.D. Cronin, J.C. Madden, S.J. Enoch, D.W. Roberts (Eds.).
13. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC), 2012. Category Approaches, Read-across, (Q)SAR. Technical Report No 116. ECETOC, Brussels, Belgium.
14. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 2009. Practical Guide 6: How to Report Read-Across and Categories, ECHA, Helsinki, ECHA-10-B-11-EN.
15. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 2011. The Use of Alternatives to Testing on Animals for the REACH Regulation 2011, ECHA, Helsinki, ECHA-11-R-004.2-EN.
16. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 2013. Grouping of Substances and Read-Across Approach. Part 1: Introductory Note, ECHA, Helsinki, ECHA-13-R-02-EN.
17. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 2013. Read-Across Illustrative Example. Part 2. Example 1 - Analogue Approach: Similarity Based on Breakdown Products, ECHA, Helsinki, ECHA-13-R-03-EN.
18. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), 2014. The Use of Alternatives to Testing on Animals for the REACH Regulation - Second report under Article 117(3) of the REACH Regulation. Available: . http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13639/alternatives_test_animals_2014_en.pdf.
19. Hansch C., Leo A. Substituents Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology 1979, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
20. Klimisch H.-J., Andreae M., Tillmann U. A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1997, 25:1-5.
21. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2007. Guidance on Grouping of Chemical. Environment Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 80, Report No. ENV/JM/MONO(2007) 28, JT03232745, OECD, Paris.
22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2011. Report of the Workshop on Using Mechanistic Information in Forming Chemical Categories. Environment Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 138, Report No. ENV/JM/MONO(2011) 8, JT03301985, OECD, Paris.
23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2013. Guidance Document for Developing and Assessing Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs). Environment Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 184, Report No. ENV/JM/MONO(2013) 6, JT03338300, OECD, Paris.
24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2014. Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals: Second Edition. Environment Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment No.194. Report No. ENV/JM/MONO(2014) 4, JT03356214, OECD, Paris.
25. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2014. Users' Handbook Supplement to the Guidance Document for Developing and Assessing AOPs. [ENV/JM/MONO(2013) 6], OECD, Paris.
26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2014. Draft Outline of Future Cooperative Work on the Hazard Assessment of Chemicals. In: 52nd Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology. Report No. ENV/JM/MONO(2014) 100, OECD, Paris.
27. Patlewicz G.Y., Ball N., Booth E.D., Hulzebos E., Zvinavshe E., Hennes C. Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: general considerations. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 67:1-12.
28. Patlewicz G.Y., Roberts D.W., Aptula A., Blackburn K., Hubesh B. Workshop: use of "read-across" for chemical safety assessment under REACH. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 65:226-228.
29. Patlewicz G., Ball N., Becker R.A., Booth E.D., Cronin M.T.D., Kroese D., Steup D., van Ravenzwaay B., Hartung T. Read-across approaches - misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead. ALTEX - Altern. Anim. Exp. 2014, 31(4/14):387-396.
30. Péry A.R.R., Schüürmann G., Ciffroy P., Faust M., Backhaus T., Aicher L., Mombelli E., Tebby C., Cronin M.T.D., Tissot S., Andres S., Brignon J.M., Frewer L., Georgiou S., Mattas K., Vergnaud J.C., Peijnenburg W., Capri E., Marchis A., Wilks M.F. Perspectives for integrating human and environmental risk assessment and synergies with socio-economic analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 456-457:307-316.
31. Petkov P.I., Patlewicz G., Schultz T.W., Honma M., Todorov M., Kotov S., Dimitrov S.D., Donner E.M., Mekenyan O.G. A feasibility study: Can information collected to classify for mutagenicity be informative in predicting carcinogenicity?. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015, 72:17-25.
32. Przybylak K.R., Madden J.C., Cronin M.T.D., Hewitt M. Assessing toxicological data quality: basic principles, existing schemes and current limitations. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2012, 23:435-459.
33. Schultz, T.W., 2014. Chapter 2.6. Read-across as a basis for one of the SEURAT-1 proof-of-concepts and an overview of the outcome of the SEURAT-1 read-across workshop. In: Gocht, T., Schwarz, M. (Eds.), Toward the Replacement of in vivo Repeated Dose Systematic Toxicity Testing. Volume 4: Implementation of the Research Strategy. COACH Consortium, Paris, pp. 72-80.
34. Steinmetz F.P., Enoch S.J., Madden J.C., Nelms M.D., Rodriguez-Sanchez N., Rowe P.H., Wen Y., Cronin M.T.D. Methods for assigning confidence to toxicity data with multiple values - identifying experimental outliers. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 482:358-365.
35. Tollefsen K.E., Scholz S., Cronin M.T., Edwards S.W., de Knecht J., Crofton K., Garcia-Reyero N., Hartung T., Worth A., Patlewicz G. Applying Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) to support Integrated Approaches to Testing and Assessment (IATA). Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 70:629-640.
36. van Leeuwen K., Schultz T.W., Henry T., Diderich R., Veith G.D. Using chemical categories to fill data gaps in hazard assessment. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2009, 20:207-220.
37. White, A., Knight, D., 2013. Chapter 4.10.8.3, Indicative rational integrated assessment strategy for SEURAT-1. In: Gocht, T., Schwarz, M. (Eds.), Toward the Replacement of in vivo Repeated Dose Systematic Toxicity Testing. Volume 3: Implementation of the Research Strategy. COACH Consortium, Paris, pp. 326-331.
38. Wu S., Blackburn K., Amburgey J., Jaworska J., Federle T. A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 56:67-81.
39. Wu S., Fisher J., Naciff J., Laufersweiler M., Lester C., Daston G., Blackburn K. Framework for identifying chemicals with structural features associated with the potential to act as developmental or reproductive toxicants. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2013, 26:1840-1861.
40. Yang L., Neagu D., Cronin M.T.D., Hewitt M., Enoch S.J., Madden J.C., Przybylak K. Towards a fuzzy expert system on toxicological data quality assessment. Mol. Inf. 2013, 32:65-78.