Evaluation of categories and read-across for toxicity prediction allowing for regulatory acceptance

Issues in Toxicology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 155-167

  Cronin, M T D ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897536429     PISSN: 17577179     EISSN: 17577187     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1039/9781849734400-00155     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. G. Patlewicz, N. Ball, E. D. Booth, E. Hulzebos, E. Zvinavashe and C. Hennes, Use of Category Approaches, Read-Across and (Q)SAR: General Considerations. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013 In press.
2. G. Patlewicz, D. W. Roberts, A. O. Aptula, K. Blackburn and B. Hubesch, Workshop: Use of 'Read-Across" for Chemical Safety Assessment under REACH. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 65, 226.
3. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC), Category Approaches, Read-across, (Q)SAR. Technical Report No 116. ECETOC, Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
4. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R.6: QSARs and Grouping of Chemicals, ECHA, Helsinki, 2008.
5. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Grouping of Substances and Read-Across Approach. Part 1: Introductory Note, ECHA, Helsinki, ECHA-13-R-02-EN, 2013.
6. European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), Read-Across Illustrative Example. Part 2. Example 1 - Analogue Approach: Similarity Based on Breakdown Products, ECHA, Helsinki, ECHA-13-R-03-EN, 2013.
7. M. T. D. Cronin, Biological read-across: mechanistically-based speciesspecies and endpoint-endpoint extrapolations in In Silico Toxicology: Principles and Applications, ed. M. T. D. Cronin and J. C. Madden, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 2010, p 446.
8. M. T. D. Cronin, F. Bajot, S. J. Enoch, J. C. Madden, D. W. Roberts and J. Schwöbel, The in chemico-in silico interface: Challenges for integrating experimental and computational chemistry to identify toxicity. Altern. Lab. Anim. - ATLA, 2009, 49, 513.
9. G. Patlewicz, O. Mekenyan, G. Dimitrova, C. Kuseva, M. Todorov, S. Stoeva, and E M. Donner, Can mutagenicity information be useful in an Integrated Testing Strategy (ITS) for skin sensitization? SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 2010, 21, 619.
10. G. Patlewicz, M. W. Chen and C. A. Bellin, Non-Testing Approaches under REACH - Help or Hindrance? Perspectives from a Practitioner within Industry. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 2010, 22, 67.
11. B. van Ravenzwaay, M. Herold, H. Kamp, M. D. Kapp, E. Fabian, R. Looser, G. Krennrich, W. Mellert, A. Prokoudine, V. Strauss, T. Walk and J. Wiemer, Metabolomics: A Tool for Early Detection of Toxicological Effects and an Opportunity for Biology Based Grouping of Chemicals - From QSAR to QBAR, Mut. Res. Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagene, 2012, 746, 144-150
12. A. P. Worth, A. Bassan and J. de Bruijn, The Role of the European Chemicals Bureau in Promoting the Regulatory Use of (Q)SAR Methods. SAR QSAR Environ, Res., 2007, 18, 111.
13. M. Pavan and A. P. Worth, Publicly-Accessible QSAR Software Tools Developed by the Joint Research Centre. SAR QSAR Environ, Res., 2008, 19, 785.
14. A. Mostrag-Szlichtyng, J. M. Z. Comenges and A. P. Worth, Computational Toxicology at the European Commission"s Joint Research Centre. Exp. Opin. Drug Metabol. Toxicol, 2010, 6, 785.
15. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Environment Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 80: Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals, OECD, Paris, 2007.