Erratum: MacroH2A histone variants act as a barrier upon reprogramming towards pluripotency (Nature Communications (2013) 4, (1565) DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2582);MacroH2A histone variants act as a barrier upon reprogramming towards pluripotency

Nature Communications

Volumn 4, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Gaspar Maia, Alexandre ^a   Qadeer, Zulekha A ^a   Hasson, Dan ^a   Ratnakumar, Kajan ^a   Adrian Leu, N ^b   Leroy, Gary ^c   Liu, Shichong ^c   Costanzi, Carl ^b   Valle Garcia, David ^a,d   Schaniel, Christoph ^a   Lemischka, Ihor ^a   Garcia, Benjamin ^c   Pehrson, John R ^b   Bernstein, Emily ^a,b  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H2A; ISOPROTEIN; PROTEIN VARIANT;

CELL ORGANELLE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENOMICS; PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; ENZYME REACTIVATION; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; GENE SILENCING; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MALE; MOUSE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; WILD TYPE;

EID: 84875887547     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3090     Document Type: Erratum

References (58)

1. Pehrson, J. & Fried, V. MacroH2A, a core histone containing a large nonhistone region. Science 257, 1398-1400 (1992).
2. Costanzi, C., Stein, P., Worrad, D., Schultz, R. & Pehrson, J. Histone macroH2A1 is concentrated in the inactive X chromosome of female preimplantation mouse embryos. Development 127, 2283-2289 (2000). (Pubitemid 30386568)
3. Costanzi, C. & Pehrson, J. Histone macroH2A1 is concentrated in the inactive X chromosome of female mammals. Nature 393, 599-601 (1998). (Pubitemid 28319252)
4. Csankovszki, G., Panning, B., Bates, B., Pehrson, J. & Jaenisch, R. Conditional deletion of Xist disrupts histone macroH2A localization but not maintenance of X inactivation. Nat. Genet. 22, 323-324 (1999). (Pubitemid 29369518)
5. Hernandez-Munoz, I. et al. Stable X chromosome inactivation involves the PRC1 Polycomb complex and requires histone MACROH2A1 and the CULLIN3/SPOP ubiquitin E3 ligase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7635-7640 (2005). (Pubitemid 40741023)
6. Heard, E. & Disteche, C. Dosage compensation in mammals: fine-tuning the expression of the X chromosome. Genes & Develop. 20, 1848-1867 (2006). (Pubitemid 44079323)
7. Buschbeck, M. et al. The histone variant macroH2A is an epigenetic regulator of key developmental genes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1074-1079 (2009).
8. Changolkar, L. et al. Genome-wide distribution of macroH2A1 histone variants in mouse liver chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 5473-5483 (2010).
9. Gamble, M., Frizzell, K., Yang, C., Krishnakumar, R. & Kraus, W. The histone variant macroH2A1 marks repressed autosomal chromatin, but protects a subset of its target genes from silencing. Genes Develop. 24, 21-32 (2010).
10. Ratnakumar, K. et al. ATRX-mediated chromatin association of histone variant macroH2A1 regulates a-globin expression. Genes. Develop. 26, 433-438 (2012).
11. Costanzi, C. & Pehrson, J. MACROH2A2, a new member of the MARCOH2A core histone family. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 21776-21784 (2001).
12. Macarthur, B., Ma'ayan, A. & Lemischka, I. Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming. Nature reviews. Mol. Cell Boil. 10, 672-681 (2009).
13. Lessard, J. & Crabtree, G. Chromatin regulatory mechanisms in pluripotency. Ann. Rev. Cell Develop. Biol. 26, 503-532 (2010).
14. Meshorer, E. et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Develop. Cell 10, 105-116 (2006). (Pubitemid 43025681)
15. Ahmed, K. et al. Global chromatin architecture reflects pluripotency and lineage commitment in the early mouse embryo. PloS One 5 (2010).
16. Gaspar-Maia, A., Alajem, A., Meshorer, E. & Ramalho-Santos, M. Open chromatin in pluripotency and reprogramming. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 36-47 (2011).
17. Pehrson, J. R., Costanzi, C. & Dharia, C. Developmental and tissue expression patterns of histone macroH2A1 subtypes. J Cell Biochem. 65, 107-113 (1997). (Pubitemid 27188073)
18. Creppe, C. et al. MacroH2A1 regulates the balance between self-renewal and differentiation commitment in embryonic and adult stem cells. Mol. Cell. Boil. 32, 1442-1452 (2012).
19. Tanasijevic, B. & Rasmussen, T. X chromosome inactivation and differentiation occur readily in ES cells doubly-deficient for macroH2A1 and macroH2A2. PloS One 6 (2011).
20. Boulard, M. et al. Histone variant macroH2A1 deletion in mice causes femalespecific steatosis. Epigenet. Chromat. 3, 8 (2010).
21. Chang, C.-C. et al. A maternal store of macroH2A is removed from pronuclei prior to onset of somatic macroH2A expression in preimplantation embryos. Develop. Biol. 278, 367-380 (2005). (Pubitemid 40175036)
22. Chang, C., Gao, S., Sung, L. & Corry, G. Rapid elimination of the histone variant MacroH2A from somatic cell heterochromatin after nuclear transfer. Cell Reprogramm. 12, 43-53 (2010).
23. Nashun, B., Yukawa, M., Liu, H., Akiyama, T. & Aoki, F. Changes in the nuclear deposition of histone H2A variants during pre-implantation development in mice. Development 137, 3785-3794 (2010).
24. Pasque, V., Gillich, A., Garrett, N. & Gurdon, J. Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming. EMBO J 30, 2373-2387 (2011).
25. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663-676 (2006). (Pubitemid 44233629)
26. Hochedlinger, K. & Plath, K. Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development 136, 509-523 (2009).
27. Ang, Y.-S., Gaspar-Maia, A., Lemischka, I. & Bernstein, E. Stem cells and reprogramming: breaking the epigenetic barrier? Trend. Pharmacol. Sci. 32, 394-401 (2011).
28. Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J. & Smith, A. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat. Genet. 24, 372-376 (2000). (Pubitemid 30187435)
29. Plazas-Mayorca, M. et al. One-pot shotgun quantitative mass spectrometry characterization of histones. J. Proteome Res. 8, 5367-5374 (2009).
30. Somers, A. et al. Generation of transgene-free lung disease-specific human induced pluripotent stem cells using a single excisable lentiviral stem cell cassette. Stem Cells 28, 1728-1740 (2010).
31. Changolkar, L. et al. Developmental changes in histone macroH2A1-mediated gene regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 2758-2764 (2007). (Pubitemid 46581363)
32. Ruiz, S. et al. A high proliferation rate is required for cell reprogramming and maintenance of human embryonic stem cell identity. Curr. Biol.: CB 21, 45-52 (2011).
33. Tsai, S.-Y. et al. Oct4 and klf4 reprogram dermal papilla cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells 28, 221-228 (2010).
34. Karras, G. et al. The macro domain is an ADP-ribose binding module. EMBO J 24, 1911-1920 (2005). (Pubitemid 40896163)
35. Mansour, A. et al. The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming. Nature 488, 409-413 (2012).
36. Creyghton, M. P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21931-21936 (2010).
37. Sridharan, R. et al. Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency. Cell 136, 364-377 (2009).
38. Marson, A. et al. Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 134, 521-533 (2008).
39. Maherali, N. et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1, 55-70 (2007).
40. Feldman, N. et al. G9a-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 188-194 (2006).
41. Athanasiadou, R. et al. Targeting of de novo DNA methylation throughout the Oct-4 gene regulatory region in differentiating embryonic stem cells. PloS One 5, (2010).
42. Murry, C. & Keller, G. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to clinically relevant populations: lessons from embryonic development. Cell 132, 661-680 (2008). (Pubitemid 351260059)
43. Onder, T. & Daley, G. New lessons learned from disease modeling with induced pluripotent stem cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Develop. 22, 500-508 (2012).
44. Gaspar-Maia, A. et al. Chd1 regulates open chromatin and pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 460, 863-868 (2009).
45. Singhal, N. et al. Chromatin-remodeling components of the BAF complex facilitate reprogramming. Cell 141, 943-955 (2010).
46. Ang, Y.-S. et al. Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network. Cell 145, 183-197 (2011).
47. Onder, T. et al. Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. Nature 483, 598-602 (2012).
48. Liang, G., He, J. & Zhang, Y. Kdm2b promotes induced pluripotent stem cell generation by facilitating gene activation early in reprogramming. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 457-466 (2012).
49. Shi, Y. et al. A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell. Stem. Cell. 2, 525-528 (2008). (Pubitemid 351729222)
50. Pasque, V. et al. Histone variant macroH2A marks embryonic differentiation in vivo and acts as an epigenetic barrier to induced pluripotency. J. Cell. Sci. (doi:10.1242/jcs.113019) (2012).
51. Ng, R. & Gurdon, J. Epigenetic memory of an active gene state depends on histone H3.3 incorporation into chromatin in the absence of transcription. Nat. Cell. Biol. 10, 102-109 (2008).
52. Sporn, J. et al. Histone macroH2A isoforms predict the risk of lung cancer recurrence. Oncogene 28, 3423-3428 (2009).
53. Kapoor, A. et al. The histone variant macroH2A suppresses melanoma progression through regulation of CDK8. Nature 468, 1105-1109 (2010).
54. Chicas, A. et al. H3K4 demethylation by Jarid1a and Jarid1b contributes to retinoblastoma-mediated gene silencing during cellular senescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8971-8976 (2012).
55. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memoryefficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
56. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
57. Liu, T. et al. Cistrome: an integrative platform for transcriptional regulation studies. Genome Biol. 12, R83 (2011).
58. Zang, C. et al. A clustering approach for identification of enriched domains from histone modification ChIP-Seq data. Bioinformatics 25, 1952-1958 (2009).