Resistance to Change in the Corporate Elite: Female Directors’ Appointments onto Nordic Boards

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 141, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 267-287

  Gregorič, Aleksandra ^a   Oxelheim, Lars ^b,c,d   Randøy, Trond ^d   Thomsen, Steen ^a  

^a Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT   (Sweden)

^c RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS IFN   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Board diversity; Board of directors; Corporate elite; Gender diversity; Gender quota

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930532205     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2703-4     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291–309.
2. Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 137–197.
3. Astley, W. G., & Van den Ven, A. H. (1983). Central perspectives and debates in organizational theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 245–273.
4. Bøhren, Ø. & Staubo, S. (2014). Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational form to avoid board upheaval. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 152–168.
5. Bøhren, O., & Strøm, Ø. (2010). Governance and politics: Regulating independence and diversity in the board room. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37, 1281–1308.
6. Brammer, S. S., & Millington, A. (2006). Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 6–18.
7. Carroll, W. K., & Fennema, M. (2002). Problems in the study of transnational business community. International Sociology, 19, 369–378.
8. Child, J. (1972). Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 1–22.
9. Clemens, B. W., & Douglas, T. J. (2005). Understanding strategic responses to institutional pressures. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1205–1213.
10. Coles, J. L., Naveen, D. D., & Naveen, L. (2008). Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics, 87, 329–356.
11. Covaleski, M. A., & Dirsmith, M. W. (1988). An institutional perspective on the rise, social transformation, and fall of a university budget category. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 562–587.
12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
13. Dobin, F., & Jung, J. (2011). Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: The competence gap or institutional investor bias? North Carolina Law Review, 89, 809–838.
14. Economist. (2010). Skirting the issue: Imposing quotas for women in boardrooms tackles a symptom of discrimination, not the cause. March 11th, print edition.
15. Fanto, J. A., Solan, L. M., & Darley, J. M. (2011). Justifying board diversity. North Carolina Law Review, 89, 901–936.
16. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–106.
17. Feld, S. L. (1982). Social structural determinants of similarity among associates. American Sociological Review, 47, 797–801.
18. Filatotchev, I., Toms, S., & Wright, M. (2006). The firm’s strategic dynamics and corporate life-cycle. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2, 259–279.
19. Fligstein, N. (1985). The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979. American Sociological Review, 50, 377–391.
20. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505.
21. Goodstein, J. D. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work–family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 350–382.
22. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1022–1054.
23. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., & Sahlin, K. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), Organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). London: Sage.
24. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Loundsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.
25. Heemskerk, E. M. (2011). The social field of the European corporate elite: A network analysis of interlocking directorates among Europe’s largest corporate boards. Global Networks, 11, 440–460.
26. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28, 747–763.
27. Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 941–952.
28. Ingram, P., & Simons, T. (1995). Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work–family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1466–1482.
29. Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. A. Guzzo, E. Salas, et al. (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 204–261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Johnson, S., Schnatterly, K., Bolton, J. F., & Tugle, C. S. (2011). Antecedents of new director social capital. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1781–1803.
31. Julian, S. D., Ofori-Dankwa, J. C., & Justis, R. T. (2008). Understanding strategic responses to interest group pressures. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 948–963.
32. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Numbers: Minorities and majorities. In R. M. Kanter (Ed.), Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
33. Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 581–598.
34. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23, 325–340.
35. Leblebici, H., Salancik, G., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of the U.S. radio broadcast industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 333–363.
36. Masulis, R., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom—The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53, 527–554.
37. Matsa, D., & Miller, A. (2011). Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. American Economic Review, 101, 635–639.
38. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
39. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: International Review, 18, 136–148.
40. Okhmatovskiy, I., & David, R. J. (2011). Setting your own standards: Internal corporate governance codes as a response to institutional pressure. Organization Science, 23, 155–176.
41. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.
42. Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 563–588.
43. Oxelheim, L., Gregoric, A., Randøy, T., & Thomsen, S. (2013). On the internationalization of corporate boards—The case of Nordic firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 173–194.
44. Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35, 455–476.
45. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1–28.
46. Rhodes, M., & Van Apeldoorn, B. (1998). Capital unbound? The transformation of European corporate governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 5, 406–427.
47. Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Stafsudd, A. (2006). People are strange when you’re a stranger: Senior executives select similar successors. European Management Review, 3, 177–189.
49. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: International Review, 17, 320–337.
50. Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reforms, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 22–39.
51. Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 167–175.
52. Useem, M., & Karabel, J. (1986). Pathways to top corporate management. American Sociological Review, 51, 184–200.
53. Waldstrøm, C., & Madsen, H. (2007). Social relations among managers: Old boys’ and young women’s networks. Women in Management Review, 22, 136–147.
54. Westphal, J. D., & Khanna, P. (2003). Keeping directors in line: Social distancing as a control mechanism in the corporate elite. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 351–398.
55. Westphal, J. D., & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 366–398.
56. Westphal, J. D., & Stern, I. (2006). The other pathway to the boardroom: Interpersonal influence behavior as a substitute for elite credentials and majority status in obtaining board appointments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 169–204.
57. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1995). Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 60–83.
58. Withers, M. C., Hillman, A. J., & Cannella, A. C. (2012). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management, 38, 243–277.
59. Woidtke, T. (2002). Agents watching agents? Evidence from pension fund ownership and firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 63(1), 99–131.
60. Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.