The Strength of Strong Ties in an Emerging Industry: Experimental Evidence of the Effects of Status Hierarchies and Personal Ties in Venture Capitalist Decision Making

Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 167-187

  Wuebker, Robert ^a   Hampl, Nina ^b   Wüstenhagen, Rolf ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Decision making; Entrepreneurship; Uncertainty; Venture capital

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930382663     PISSN: 19324391     EISSN: 1932443X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sej.1188     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Agarwal R, Audretsch D, Sarkar MB. 2007. The process of creative construction: knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1(3/4): 263-286.
2. Allenby GM, Arora N, Ginter JL. 1995. Incorporating prior knowledge into the analysis of conjoint studies. Journal of Marketing Research 32(2): 152-162.
3. Allenby GM, Ginter JL. 1995. Using extremes to design products and segment markets. Journal of Marketing Research 32(4): 392-403.
4. Alvarez SA, Barney JB. 2005. How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty? Journal of Management 31(5): 776-793.
5. Alvarez SA, Barney JB. 2007. The entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of Management Studies 44(7): 1057-1063.
6. Alvarez SA, Barney JB. 2008. Opportunities, organizations, and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2(4): 265-267.
7. Alvarez SA, Parker SC. 2009. Emerging firms and the allocation of control rights: a Bayesian approach. Academy of Management Review 34(2): 209-227.
8. Andrews RL, Ansari A, Currim IS. 2002. Hierarchical Bayes versus finite mixture conjoint analysis models: a comparison of fit, prediction, and part-worth recovery. Journal of Marketing Research 39(1): 87-98.
9. Batjargal B. 2007. Internet entrepreneurship: social capital, human capital, and performance of Internet ventures in China. Research Policy 36(5): 605-618.
10. Beckman CM, Haunschild PR, Phillips DJ. 2004. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization Science 15(3): 259-275.
11. Borgatti SP, Foster PC. 2003. The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. Journal of Management 29(6): 991-1013.
12. Brundin E, Patzelt H, Shepherd DA. 2008. Managers' emotional displays and employees' willingness to act entrepreneurially. Journal of Business Venturing 23(2): 221-243.
13. Bruno AV, Tyebjee TT. 1983. The one that got away: a study of ventures rejected by venture capitalists. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Hornaday JA, Timmons JA, Vesper KH (eds). Babson College: Boston, MA; 289-306.
14. Bruno AV, Tyebjee TT. 1986. The destinies of rejected venture capital deals. Sloan Management Review 27(2): 43-53.
15. Burt RS. 1983. Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy. Academic Press: New York.
16. Burt RS. 1995. Le capital social, les trous structuraux, et l'entrepreneur. Revue Française de Sociologie 36: 599-628.
17. Busenitz LW, Fiet JO, Moesel DD. 2004. Reconsidering the venture capitalists' 'value added' proposition: an interorganizational learning perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 19(6): 787-807.
18. Bygrave WD. 1987. Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: a networking perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 2(2): 139-154.
19. Carpenter MA, Westphal JD. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 639-660.
20. Chandler GN. 1996. Business similarity as a moderator of the relationship between pre-ownership experience and venture performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 20(3): 51-65.
21. Chapman CN, Alford JL, Johnson C, Weidemann R, Lahav M. 2009. CBC vs. ACBC: comparing results with real product selection. Research paper, Sawtooth Software, Northbrook, IL.
22. Chen H, Gompers P, Kovner A, Lerner J. 2010. Buy local? The geography of venture capital. Journal of Urban Economics 67(1): 90-102.
23. Dean MA, Shook CL, Payne GT. 2007. The past, present, and future of entrepreneurship research: data analytic trends and training. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 31(4): 601-618.
24. DeSarbo W, MacMillan IC, Day DL. 1987. Criteria for corporate venturing: importance assigned by managers. Journal of Business Venturing 2(4): 329-350.
25. Dimov D, Shepherd DA. 2005. Human capital theory and venture capital firms: exploring 'home runs' and 'strike outs.' Journal of Business Venturing 20(4): 481-502.
26. Dimov D, Shepherd DA, Sutcliffe KM. 2007. Requisite expertise, firm reputation, and status in venture capital investment allocation decisions. Journal of Business Venturing 22(4): 481-502.
27. Dixon R. 1991. Venture capitalists and the appraisal of investments. Omega 19(5): 333-344.
28. Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ. 2005. When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy 34(5): 615-639.
29. Elrod T, Louviere JJ, Davey KS. 1992. An empirical comparison of ratings-based and choice-based conjoint models. Journal of Marketing Research 29(3): 368-377.
30. EVCA. 2011. Creating Lasting Value: Yearbook 2011. European Private Equity and Venture Capital Association, Brussels, Belgium.
31. Folta TB. 2007. Uncertainty rules the day. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1(1/2): 97-99.
32. Franke N, Gruber M, Harhoff D, Henkel J. 2006. What you are is what you like: similarity biases in venture capitalists' evaluations of start-up teams. Journal of Business Venturing 21(6): 802-826.
33. Franke N, Gruber M, Harhoff D, Henkel J. 2008. Venture capitalists' evaluations of start-up teams: trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32(3): 459-483.
34. Galaskiewicz J, Shatin D. 1981. Leadership and networking among neighborhood human service organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 26(3): 434-448.
35. Gompers PA. 1995. Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. Journal of Finance 50(5): 1461-1489.
36. Gompers PA, Kovner A, Lerner J, Scharfstein D. 2010. Performance persistence in entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics 96(1): 18-32.
37. Gompers PA, Lerner J. 1999. An analysis of compensation in the U.S. venture capital partnership. Journal of Financial Economics 51(1): 3-44.
38. Gompers PA, Mukharlyamov V, Xuan Y. 2012. The cost of friendship. NBER Working Paper No. 18141, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
39. Gorman M, Sahlman WA. 1986. What do venture capitalists do? In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Ronstadt R, Hornaday JA, Peterson R, Vesper KH (eds). Babson College: Boston, MA; 414-436.
40. Gould RV. 2002. The origins of status hierarchies: a formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology 107(5): 1143-1178.
41. Granovetter MS. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360-1380.
42. Granovetter MS. 1983. The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1: 201-233.
43. Green PE, Krieger AM, Wind Y. 2001. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: reflections and prospects. Interfaces 31(3): S56-S73.
44. Green PE, Rao VR. 1971. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research 8(3): 355-363.
45. Green PE, Srinivasan V. 1990. Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing 54(4): 3-19.
46. Greene WH. 2011. Econometric Analysis. Pearson Education: Harlow, U.K.
47. Gulati R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38(1): 85-112.
48. Guler I, Guillén MF. 2010a. Institutions and the internationalization of U.S. venture capital firms. Journal of International Business Studies 41: 185-205.
49. Guler I, Guillén MF. 2010b. Home country networks and foreign expansion: evidence from the venture capital industry. Academy of Management Journal 53(2): 390-410.
50. Gustafsson A, Hermann A, Huber F (eds). 2007. Conjoint Measurement: Methods and Applications. Springer: Berlin, Germany.
51. Hagedoorn J, Frankort HTW. 2008. The gloomy side of embeddedness: the effects of overembeddedness on inter-firm partnership formation. In Network Strategy (Advances in Strategic Management), Baum JAC, Rowley TJ (eds). Emerald Group: Bingley, U.K.; 503-530.
52. Hall J, Hofer CW. 1993. Venture capitalists' decision criteria in new venture evaluation. Journal of Business Venturing 8(1): 25-42.
53. Hallen B, Katila R, Rosenberger J. 2014. Unpacking social defenses: a resource-dependence lens on technology ventures, venture capital, and corporate relationships. Academy of Management Journal 57(4): 1078-1101.
54. Hellmann T, Puri M. 2002. Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: empirical evidence. Journal of Finance 57(1): 169-197.
55. Henderson RM, Clark KB. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 9-30.
56. Hisrich RD, Jankowicz AD. 1990. Intuition in venture capital decisions: an exploratory study using a new technique. Journal of Business Venturing 5(1): 49-62.
57. Hite JM, Hesterly WS. 2001. The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 22(3): 275-286.
58. Hochberg YV, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y. 2007. Whom you know matters: venture capital networks and investment performance. Journal of Finance 62(1): 251-301.
59. Hochberg YV, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y. 2010. Networking as a barrier to entry and the competitive supply of venture capital. Journal of Finance 65(3): 829-859.
60. Hsu DH. 2004. What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? Journal of Finance 59(4): 1805-1844.
61. Hsu DH. 2007. Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Research Policy 36(5): 722-741.
62. Huber J, Ariely D, Fischer G. 2002. Expressing preferences in a principal-agent task: a comparison of choice, rating, and matching. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 87(1): 66-90.
63. Hutt RW, Thomas B. 1985. Venture capital in Arizona. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Hornaday JA, Shils EB, Timmons JA, Vesper KH (eds). Babson College: Boston, MA; 155-169.
64. Johnson RM. 2000. Understanding HB: an intuitive approach. Research paper, Sawtooth Software, Northbrook, IL.
65. Johnson RM, Orme BK. 2007. A new approach to adaptive CBC. Research paper, Sawtooth Software, Northbrook, IL.
66. Jones C, Hesterly WS, Borgatti SP. 1997. A general theory of network governance: exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review 22(4): 911-945.
67. Kogut B. 1988. Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9(4): 319-332.
68. Krackhardt D. 1992. The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations. In Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Nohria N, Eccles R (eds). Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA; 216-239.
69. Landström H, Manigart S, Mason C, Sapienza HJ. 1998. Contracts between entrepreneurs and investors: terms and negotiation processes. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Reynolds P, Bygrave W, Carter N, Manigart S, Mason C, Meyer D, Shaver K (eds). Babson College: Boston, MA; 571-585.
70. Lee PM, Pollock TG, Jin K. 2011. The contingent value of venture capitalist reputation. Strategic Organization 9(1): 33-69.
71. Lenk PJ, DeSarbo WS, Green PE, Young MR. 1996. Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: recovery of part-worth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Marketing Science 15(2): 173-191.
72. Lohrke FT, Holloway BB, Woolley TW. 2010. Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research: a review and research agenda. Organizational Research Methods 13(1): 16-30.
73. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait J, Adamowicz W. 2003. Stated Choice Methods Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.
74. Louviere JJ, Islam T, Wasi N, Street D, Burgess L. 2008. Designing discrete choice experiments: do optimal designs come at a price? Journal of Consumer Research 35(2): 360-375.
75. Lynn FB, Podolny JM, Tao L. 2009. A sociological (de)construction of the relationship between status and quality. American Journal of Sociology 115(3): 755-804.
76. MacMillan IC, Siegel R, Subba Narasimha PN. 1985. Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing 1(1): 119-128.
77. MacMillan IC, Subba Narasimha PN. 1986. Characteristics distinguishing funded from unfunded business plans evaluated by venture capitalists. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Hornaday JA, Timmons JA, Vesper KH (eds). Babson College: Boston, MA; 404-413.
78. Martin R, Sunley P, Turner D. 2001. Taking risks in regions: the geographical anatomy of Europe's emerging venture capital market. Journal of Economic Geography 2(2): 121-150.
79. Matusik SF, George JM, Heeley MB. 2008. Values and judgment under uncertainty: evidence from venture capitalist assessments of founders. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2(2): 95-115.
80. McFadden D. 1986. The choice theory approach to market research. Marketing Science 5(4): 275-297.
81. Meuleman M, Lockett A, Manigart S, Wright M. 2010. Partner selection decisions in interfirm collaborations: the paradox of relational embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies 47(6): 995-1019.
82. Meyer GD, Zacharakis AL, De Castro JO. 1993. A post-mortem of new venture failure: an attribution theory perspective. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Churchill NC, Birley S, Doutriaux J, Gatewood EJ, Hoy FS, Wetzel WE (eds). Babson College: Boston, MA; 256-269.
83. Mitchell JR, Shepherd DA. 2010. To thine own self be true: images of self, images of opportunity, and entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing 25(1): 138-154.
84. Moore WL. 2004. A cross-validity comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21(3): 299-312.
85. Moore WL, Gray-Lee J, Louviere JJ. 1998. A cross-validity comparison of conjoint analysis and choice models at different levels of aggregation. Marketing Letters 9(2): 195-207.
86. Morrison EW. 2002. Newcomers' relationships: the role of social network ties during socialization. Academy of Management Journal 45(6): 1149-1160.
87. Muzyka D, Birley S, Leleux B. 1996. Trade-offs in the investment decisions of European venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing 11(4): 273-287.
88. Netzer O, Toubia O, Bradlow ET, Dahan E, Evgeniou T, Feinberg FM, Feit EM, Hui SK, Johnson J, Liechty JC, Orlin JB, Rao VR. 2008. Beyond conjoint analysis: advances in preference measurement. Marketing Letters 19(3): 337-354.
89. Nowlis SM, Simonson I. 1997. Attribute-task compatibility as a determinant of consumer preference reversals. Journal of Marketing Research 34(2): 205-218.
90. NVCA. 2011. National Venture Capital Association: Yearbook 2011. National Venture Capital Association: Arlington, VA.
91. Orme BK. 2000. Hierarchical Bayes: why all the attention? Research paper, Sawtooth Software, Northbrook, IL.
92. Orme BK. 2010. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. Research Publishers: Madison, WI.
93. Ozmel U, Reuer JJ, Gulati R. 2012. Signals across multiple networks: how venture capital and alliance networks affect interorganizational collaboration. Academy of Management Journal 56(3): 852-866.
94. Payne GT, Davis JL, Moore CB, Bell RG. 2009. The deal structuring stage of the venture capitalist decision-making process: exploring confidence and control. Journal of Small Business Management 47(2): 154-179.
95. Petty JS, Gruber M. 2011. In pursuit of the real deal: a longitudinal study of VC decision making. Journal of Business Venturing 26(2): 172-188.
96. Pfeffer J, Salancik G. 2003. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
97. Podolny JM. 1994. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(3): 458-483.
98. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 116-145.
99. Riquelme H, Rickards T. 1992. Hybrid conjoint analysis: an estimation probe in new venture decisions. Journal of Business Venturing 7(6): 505-518.
100. Roberts EB. 1991. High stakes for high-tech entrepreneurs: understanding venture capital decision making. Sloan Management Review 32(2): 9-20.
101. Rossi PE, Allenby GM. 2003. Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Science 22(3): 304-328.
102. Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch R. 2005. Bayesian Statistics and Marketing. John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, U.K.
103. Ruhnka JC, Young JE. 1991. Some hypotheses about risk in venture capital investing. Journal of Business Venturing 6(2): 115-133.
104. Sapienza HJ. 1992. When do venture capitalists add value? Journal of Business Venturing 7(1): 9-27.
105. Sapienza HJ, Gupta AK. 1994. Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalist-CEO interaction. Academy of Management Journal 37(6): 1618-1632.
106. Sapienza HJ, Korsgaard MA. 1996. Procedural justice in entrepreneur-investor relations. Academy of Management Journal 39(3): 544-574.
107. Sawtooth Software. 2009a. The adaptive choice-based conjoint (ACBC). Technical paper, Sawtooth Software, Northbrook, IL.
108. Sawtooth Software. 2009b. The CBC/HB system for hierarchical Bayes: version 5.0. Technical paper, Sawtooth Software, Northbrook, IL.
109. Shane S, Cable D. 2002. Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science 48(3): 364-381.
110. Shepherd DA. 1999. Venture capitalists' assessment of new venture survival. Management Science 45(5): 621-632.
111. Shepherd DA, Zacharakis AL. 1997. Conjoint analysis: a window of opportunity for entrepreneurship research. In Advances in Entrepreneurship: Firm Emergence and Growth, Katz J (ed). JAI Press: Greenwich, CT; 203-248.
112. Shepherd DA, Zacharakis AL. 1999. Conjoint analysis: a new methodological approach for researching the decision policies of venture capitalists. Venture Capital 1(3): 197-217.
113. Shepherd DA, Zacharakis AL, Baron RA. 2003. VCs' decision processes: evidence suggesting more experience may not always be better. Journal of Business Venturing 18(3): 381-401.
114. Silva J. 2004. Venture capitalists' decision-making in small equity markets: a case study using participant observation. Venture Capital 6(2/3): 125-145.
115. Sorenson O. 2003. Social networks and industrial geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13(5): 513-527.
116. Sorenson O, Stuart TE. 2001. Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology 106(6): 1546-1588.
117. Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(2): 315-349.
118. Stuart TE, Sorenson O. 2007. Strategic networks and entrepreneurial ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1(3/4): 211-227.
119. Thompson JD. 1967. Organizations in Action. McGraw-Hill: New York.
120. Train K. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.
121. Tripsas M, Gavetti G. 2000. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21(10/11): 1147-1161.
122. Tyebjee TT, Bruno AV. 1981. Venture capital decision making: preliminary results from three empirical studies. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Vesper KH (ed). Babson College: Boston, MA; 316-334.
123. Tyebjee TT, Bruno AV. 1984. A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science 30(9): 1051-1066.
124. Uzzi B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 35-67.
125. 2 measures for some common limited dependent variable models. Journal of Economic Surveys 10(3): 241-259.
126. Washington M, Zajac E. 2005. Status evolution and competition: theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal 48(2): 282-296.
127. Wellman B, Berkowitz SD. 1988. Toward a structural sociology. In Social Structures: A Network Approach, Wellman B, Berkowitz SD (eds). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.; 1-18.
128. Wells WA. 1974. Venture capital decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
129. Wilson R. 1985. Reputations in games and markets. In Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining, Roth AE (ed). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.; 27-62.
130. Wright M, Robbie K, Ennew C. 1997. Venture capitalists and serial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing 12(3): 227-249.
131. Zacharakis AL, McMullen JS, Shepherd DA. 2007. Venture capitalists' decision policies across three countries: an institutional theory perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 38(5): 691-708.
132. Zider B. 1998. How venture capital works. Harvard Business Review 76(6): 131-140.