Erratum to Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research: A review and research agenda (Organizational Research Methods, (2010), 13, 1 (16-30), 10.1177/1094428109341992);Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research: A review and research Agenda

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 16-30

  Lohrke, Franz T ^a   Holloway, Betsy Bugg ^a   Woolley, Thomas W ^a  

^a SAMFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Multiple regression; Quantitative research; Research design

Indexed keywords

EID: 70949088483     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428109355832     Document Type: Erratum

References (57)

1. Aiman-Smith, L., Scullen, S., & Barr, S. (2002). Conducting studies of decision making in organizational contexts: A tutorial for policy-capturing and other regression-based techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 388-414.
2. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 105-123.
3. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 1-22.
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of changes. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
6. Baron, R. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275-294.
7. Baron, R. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs ''connect the dots'' to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 104-119.
8. Baron, R., & Ensley, M. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52, 1331-1344.
9. Bloom, P.N., Hoeffler, S., Keller, K.L., & Meza, C. (2006). How social-cause marketing affects consumer perceptions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47, 49-55.
10. Brush, C., Duhaime, I., Gartner, W., Stewart, A., Katz, J., Hitt, M.,et al.(2003). Doctoral education in the field of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29, 309-331.
11. Busenitz, L., & Barney, J. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9-30.
12. Busenitz, L., West, G., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29, 285-308.
13. Choi, Y., & Shepherd, D. (2004). Entrepreneurs' decisions to exploit opportunities. Journal of Management, 30, 377-395.
14. Dean, M., Shook, C., & Payne, G. (2007). The past, present, and future of entrepreneurship research: Data analytic trends and training. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 601-618.
15. DeSarbo, W., MacMillan, I., & Day, D. (1987). Criteria for corporate venturing: Importance assigned by managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 329-350.
16. DeTienne, D., Shepherd, D., & De Castro, J. (2008). The fallacy of ''only the strong survive'': The effects of extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions of underperforming firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 528-546.
17. Ding, M., Grewal, R., & Liechty, J. (2005). Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 67-82.
18. Eckhardt, J., & Shane, S. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29, 333-349.
19. Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. (2008). Venture capitalists' evaluations of start-up teams: Trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 459-483.
20. Fried, V. (2003). Defining a forum for entrepreneurship scholars. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 1-11.
21. Gaglio, C., & Katz, J. (2001). The psychological basis for opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16, 95-111.
22. Gartner, W. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 15-28.
23. Golden, B. (1992). The past is the past - Or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 848-860.
24. Green, P., & Rao, B. (1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8, 355-363.
25. Green, P., & Srinivasan, V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54, 3-19.
26. Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Hoeffler, S. (2003). Measuring preferences for really new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 406-420.
28. Janney, J., & Dess, G. (2006). The risk concept for entrepreneurs reconsidered: New challenges to the conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 385-400.
29. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
30. Karren, R., & Barringer, M. (2002). A review and analysis of the policy-capturing methodology in organizational research: Guidelines for research and practice. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 337-387.
31. Keh, H., Foo, M., & Lim, B. (2002). Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: The cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 125-148.
32. Ketchen, D., & Shook, C. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 441-458.
33. Kirzner, I. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60-85.
34. Luce, R., & Tukey, J. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1-27.
35. Markman, G., Balkin, D., & Baron, R. (2002). Investors and new venture formation: The effects of general self-efficacy and regretful thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 149-164.
36. McMullen, J., & Shepherd, D. (2006). Encouraging consensus-challenging research in universities. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1643-1669.
37. Mitchell, J., Friga, P., & Mitchell, R. (2005). Untangling the intuition mess: Intuitions as a construct in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 653-679.
38. Norton, W., & Moore, W. (2006). The influence of entrepreneurial risk assessment on venture launch or growth decisions. Small Business Economics, 26, 215-226.
39. Oppewal, H., Louviere, J., & Timmermans, H. (2000). Modifying conjoint methods to model managers' reactions to business environment trends. Journal of Business Research, 50, 245-257.
40. Palich, L., & Bagby, D. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 425-438.
41. Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline review of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
42. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
43. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, N. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226.
44. Shepherd, D. (1999). Venture capitalists' assessment of new venture survival. Management Science, 45, 621-632.
45. Shepherd, D., & Krueger, N. (2002). An intentions-based model of entrepreneurial teams' social cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 167-187.
46. Shepherd, D., & Zacharakis, A. (1997). Conjoint analysis: A window of opportunity for entrepreneurship research. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth ((Vol. 3, pp. 203-248). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
47. Shepherd, D., & Zacharakis, A. (1999). Conjoint analysis: A new methodological approach for researching venture capitalists' decisions. Venture Capital, 1, 197-217.
48. Schoder, D., & Haenlein, M. (2004). The relative importance of different trust constructs for sellers in the online world. Electronic Markets, 14, 48-57.
49. Shook, C., Priem, R., & McGee, J. (2003). Venture creation and the enterprising individual: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 29, 379-399.
50. Simon, M., Houghton, S., & Aquino, K. (2000). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 113-134.
51. Sitkin, S., & Weingart, L. (1995). Determinants of risky decision-making behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1573-1592.
52. Smith, B., Matthews, C., & Schenkel, M. (2009). Differences in entrepreneurial opportunities: The role of tacit-ness and codification in opportunity identification. Journal of Small Business Management, 47, 38-57.
53. Smith, V., & Walker, J. (1993). Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics. Economic-Inquiry, 31, 245-261.
54. Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structures of organizations. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 153-193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
55. Tyebjee, T., & Bruno, A. (1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science, 9, 1051-1066.
56. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2008). Opportunity identification and pursuit: Does an entrepreneur's human capital matter? Small Business Economics, 30, 153-173.
57. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 119-138). Greenwich, CT: JAI.