Grammar acquisition and processing instruction: Secondary and cumulative effects

Grammar Acquisition and Processing Instruction: Secondary and Cumulative Effects

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-211

  Benati, Alessandro G ^a   Lee, James F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREENWICH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930351227     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (95)

1. Allen, L.Q. (2000) Form-meaning connections and the French causative. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22, 69-84.
2. Barcroft, J. and VanPatten, B. (1997) Acoustic salience of grammatical forms: The effect of location stress, and boundedness on Spanish L2 input processing. In W.R. Glass and A.T. Pérez-Leroux (eds) Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish: Production, Processing and Comprehension (pp. 109-121). Somerville, MA:Cascadilla Press.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2007) One functional approach to second language acquisition:The concept-oriented approach. In B. VanPatten and J.Williams (eds) Theories of Second Language Acquisition:AnIntroduction (pp. 97-113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Benati, A. (2001) A comparative study of the effects of processing instruction and output-based instruction on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. Language Teaching Research 5, 95-127.
5. Benati, A. (2004a) The effects of structured input and explicit information on the acquisition of Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction:Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 207-255). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Benati, A. (2004b) The effects of processing instruction and its components on the acquisition of gender agreement in Italian. Language Awareness 13, 67-80.
7. Benati, A. (2005) The effects of PI, TI and MOI in the acquisition of English simple past tense. Language Teaching Research 9, 67-113.
8. Bernhardt, E.B. (1992) Reading Development in a Second Language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Bever, T.G. (1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In R. Hayes (ed.) Cognition and Language Development (pp. 279-362). New York: Wiley & Sons.
10. Bransdorfer, R. (1991) Communicative value and linguistic knowledge in second language oral input processing. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
11. Brown, J.D. (1988) Understanding Research in Second Language Learning: A Teacher’s Guide to Statistics and Research Design. London: Cambridge University Press
12. Cadierno, T. (1995) Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. The Modern Language Journal 79, 179-93.
13. Carroll, S. (2004) Commentary: Some general and specific comments on input processing and processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction:Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 293-309). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Carroll, S. (2007) Autonomous induction theory. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories of Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (pp. 155-173). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Cheng, A. (2002) The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of ser and estar. Hispania 85, 308-323.
16. Cheng, A. (2004) Processing instruction and Spanish ser and estar: Forms with semantic-aspectual value. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research and Commentary (pp. 119-141). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Collentine, J.G. (1998) Processing Instruction and the subjunctive. Hispania 81, 576-587.
18. Collentine, J.G. (2004) Commentary: Where PI research has been and where it should be going. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 119-141). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. DeKeyser, R. (1997) Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second Language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19, 195-221.
20. DeKeyser, R. (2007) Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories of Second Language Acquisition:AnIntroduction (pp. 97-113). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
21. Echevarría, M.S. (1978) Desarrollo de la comprensión infantil de la sintaxis española. Concepción: Universidad de Concepción.
22. Ellis, N. (2007) The associative-cognitive CREED. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories of Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (pp. 77-95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Ervin-Tripp, S. (1974) Is second language learning like the first? TESOL Quarterly 8, 111-127.
24. Farley, A.P. (2001a) The effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. Spanish Applied Linguistics 5, 57-94.
25. Farley, A.P. (2001b) Authentic processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive. Hispania 84, 289-299.
26. Farley, A. (2004a) The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-based output instruction. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research and Commentary (pp. 143-168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Farley, A. (2004b) Processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive: Is explicit information needed? In B.VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 227-239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Farley A. (2005) Structured Input: Grammar Instruction for the Acquisition-Oriented Classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. González, N. (1997)Aparametric study of L2 acquisition: Interpretation of Spanish word order. In A.T. Pérez-Leroux andW.R. Glass (eds) Contemporary Perspectives on The Acquisition of Spanish (Vol. 1): Developing Grammars (pp. 133-148). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
30. Houston, T. (1997) Sentence processing in Spanish a background knowledge. In W.R. Glass and A.T. Pérez-Leroux (eds) Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish: Production, Processing and Comprehension (pp. 123-134). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
31. Klein, W. (1986) Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
32. Krashen, S. (1982) Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. London:Pergamon.
33. Lee, J.F. (1987)Comprehending the Spanish subjunctive:Aninformation processing perspective. Modern Language Journal 71 (1), 50-57.
34. Lee, J.F. (1990) Constructive processes evidenced by early stage non-native readers of Spanish in comprehending an expository text. Hispanic Linguistics 4, 129-148.
35. Lee, J.F. (1998) The relationship of verb morphology to second language reading comprehension and input processing. Modern Language Journal 82 (1), 33-48.
36. Lee, J.F. (1999) On levels of processing and levels of comprehension. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach and F. Martínez-Gil (eds) Advances in Hispanic Linguistics (pp. 42-59). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
37. Lee, J.F. (2002) The incidental acquisition of Spanish future tense morphology through reading in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 55-80.
38. Lee, J. (2003) Cognitive and linguistic perspectives on the acquisition of object pronouns in Spanish. In B. Lafford and R. Salaberry (eds) Spanish Second Language Acquisition: State of the Science (pp. 98-129). Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press.
39. Lee, J. (2004) On the generalizability, limits, and potential future directions of processing instruction research. In B.VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 311-323). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Lee, J. and Benati, A. (2007a) Second Language Processing: An Analysis of Theory, Problems and Solutions. Continuum: London.
41. Lee, J. and Benati, A. (2007b) Delivering Processing Instruction in Classrooms and Virtual Contexts: Research and Practice. Equinox, London.
42. Lee, J.F., Benati, A., Aguilar-Sánchez, J. and McNulty, E.M. (2007) Comparing three modes of delivering processing instruction on preterite/imperfect distinction and negative informal commands in Spanish. In J. Lee and A. Benati Delivering Processing Instruction in Classrooms and Virtual Contexts: Research and Practice (pp. 73-98). Equinox: London.
43. Lee J., Cadierno, T., Glass, W. and VanPatten, B. (1997) The effects of lexical and grammatical cues on processing past temporal reference in second language input. Applied Language Learning 8, 1-27.
44. Lee, J.F. and Rodriguez, R. (1997) The effects of lexemic and morphosyntactic modifications on L2 reading comprehension and input processing. In W.R. Glass and A.T. Perez-Leroux Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish (pp. 135-157). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
45. Lee, J.F. and Rossomondo, A. (2004) Cross experimental evidence for the incidental acquisition of Spanish future tense morphology. Paper presented at the Annual Symposium on Hispanic Linguistics. Minneapolis, October.
46. Lee, J. and VanPatten, B. (1995) Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Lee, J. and VanPatten, B. (2003) Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
48. LoCoco, V. (1987) Learner comprehension of oral and written importance of word order. In B. VanPatten, T. Dvorak and J.F. Lee (eds) Foreign Language Learning: A Research Perspective (pp. 119-129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
49. Long, M. (1991) Focus on form:Adesign feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot (ed.) Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
50. Mangubhai, F. (1991) The processing behaviours of adult second language learners and their relationship to second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics 12, 268-297.
51. Marsden, E. (2005) Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning 56, 507-566.
52. Mitchell, R. and Myles, F. (2004) Second Language Learning Theories (2nd edn). London: Hodder Arnold.
53. Morgan-Short, K. and Bowden, H.W. (2006) Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28, 31-65.
54. Musumeci, D. (1989) The ability of second language learners to assign tense at the sentence level: A cross-linguistic study. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
55. Nam, E. (1975) Child and adult perceptual strategies in second language acquisition. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention, Los Angeles.
56. Ortega, L. (2007) Second language learning explained? SLA across nine contemporary theories. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 225-250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Paulston, C. (1972) Structural patterns drills: A classification. In H. Allen and R. Campbell (eds) Teaching English as a Second Language (pp. 129-138). New York:McGraw-Hill.
58. Peters, A.M. (1985) Language segmentation: Operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In D. Slobin (ed.) The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition: Theoretical Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Pienemann, M. (2007) Processability theory. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (pp. 137-154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Rosa, E., and O’Neill, M.(1998) Effects of stress and location on acoustic salience at the initial stages of Spanish L2 input processing. Spanish Applied Linguistics 2, 24-52.
61. Rossomondo, A.E. (2007) The role of lexical temporal indicators and text interaction format on the incidental acquisition of Spanish future tense morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 39-66.
62. Salaberry, M.R. (1997) The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. The Canadian Modern Language Review 53, 422-451.
63. Sanz, C. (1997) Experimental tasks in SLA research: Amount of production, modality, memory, and production processes. In W.R. Glass and A.T. Perez-Leroux (eds) Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish: Production, Processing, and Comprehension (pp. 41-56). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
64. Sanz, C. (2004) Computer delivered implicit versus explicit feedback in processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 241-255). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Schmidt, R. (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11, 129-158.
66. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1986) Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics 7, 239-274.
67. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1991) Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research 7, 118-132.
68. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1993) Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 165-179.
69. Slobin, D.I. (1966) Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal ofVerbal Learning&Verbal Behaviour5, 219-227.
70. Slobin D. I. (1973) Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C.A. Ferguson and D.I. Slobin (eds) Studies of Child Language Development. New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
71. Tomlin, R. and Villa, V. (1994) Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, 183-204.
72. VanPatten, B. (1985) Communicative value and information processing in second language acquisition. In E. Judd, P. Nelson and D. Messerschmitt (eds) On TESOL '84: A Brave New World (pp. 88-99). Washington, DC: TESOL.
73. VanPatten, B. (1990) Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12, 287-301.
74. VanPatten, B. (1993) Grammar instruction for the acquisition rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals 26, 433-450.
75. VanPatten, B. (1996) Input Processing and Grammar Instruction: Theory and Research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
76. VanPatten, B. (2000) Processing instruction as form-meaning connections: Issues in theory and research. In J.F. Lee and A. Valdman (eds) Form and Meaning: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 43-68). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
77. VanPatten, B. (2002) Processing Instruction:Anupdate. Language Learning 52, 755-803.
78. VanPatten, B. (2003) From Input to Output: A Teacher’s Guide to Second Language Acquisition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
79. VanPatten, B. (ed.) (2004a) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research and Commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
80. VanPatten, B. (2004b) Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary(pp. 5-31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
81. Van Patten, B. (2007) Input processing in adult second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 115-135). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. VanPatten, B. and Cadierno, T. (1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 225-243.
83. VanPatten, B. and Fernández, C. (2004) The long-term effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 273-289). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
84. Van Patten, B. and Houston, T. (1998) Contextual effects in processing L2 input sentences. Spanish Applied Linguistics 2, 53-70.
85. VanPatten, B., Lee, J.F. and Ballman, T. (2006) Viztazos: Un curso breve. New York:McGraw-Hill.
86. VanPatten, B. and Oikennon, S. (1996) Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 495-510.
87. VanPatten, B. and Sanz, C. (1995) From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F.R. Eckman, D. Highland, P.W. Lee, J. Mileham and R.R.Weber (eds) Second Language Acquisition Theory and Pedagogy (pp. 169-185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
88. VanPatten, B. and Williams, J. (2007a) Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. VanPatten, B. and Williams, J. (2007b) Introduction: The nature of theories. In B. VanPatten and J. Williams (eds) Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction (pp. 1-16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
90. VanPatten, B., Williams, J. and Rott, S. (2004) Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. In B.VanPatten, J.Williams, S. Rott and M. Overstreet (eds) Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 1-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. VanPatten, B. andWong, W. (2004) Processing instruction and the French causative:Another replication. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 97-118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
92. Wong, W. (2004a) The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary(pp. 33-63). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
93. Wong.W. (2004b) Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. In B.VanPatten (ed.) Processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 187-205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
94. Wong, W. (2005) Input Enhancement: From Theory and Research to the Classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.
95. Wong, W. and VanPatten, B. (2003) The evidence is IN: Drills are OUT. Foreign Language Annals 36, 403-423.