The incidental acquisition of spanish

Studies in Second Language Acquisition

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 55-80

  Lee, James F ^a  

^a Indiana University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937385692     PISSN: 02722631     EISSN: 14701545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0272263102001031     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Berne, J. (2000). The impact of enhanced comprehensibility on conscious attention to form and content. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 4, 133-159.
2. Carrell, P. (1983). Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Language Learning, 33, 183-207.
3. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469.
4. Greenslade, T., Bouden, L., & Sanz, C. (1999). Attending to form and content in processing L2 reading texts. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 3, 65-90.
5. Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the "short circuit" in L2 reading: Nondecoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 1-29.
6. Hulstijn, J. (1989). Implicit and incidental second language learning: Experiments in the processing of natural and partially artificial input. In H. Dechert & M. Raupauch (Eds.), Interlingual processes (pp. 49-73). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
7. Krashen, S. D. (1993). The power of reading. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
8. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language research. London: Longman.
9. Lee, J. (1986). Background knowledge and L2 reading. Modern Language Journal, 70, 350-354.
10. Lee, J. (1987). Comprehending the Spanish subjunctive: An information processing perspective. Modern Language Journal, 71, 50-57.
11. Lee, J. (1990). Constructive processes evidenced by early stage non-native readers of Spanish in comprehending an expository text. Hispanic Linguistics, 4, 129-148.
12. Lee, J. F. (1998). The relationship of verb morphology to second language reading comprehension and input processing. Modern Language Journal, 82, 33-48.
13. Lee, J. (1999). On levels of processing and levels of comprehension. In J. Gutierrez-Rexach & F. Marti-nez-Gil (Eds.), Advances in Hispanic linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium: Vol. 1 (pp. 42-59). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
14. Lee, J., Glass, W., Cadierno, T., & VanPatten, B. (1997). The effects of lexical and grammatical cues on processing past temporal reference in second language input. Applied Language Learning, 8, 1-23.
15. Lee, J., & Riley, G. (1990). The effect of prereading, rhetorically-oriented frameworks on the recall of two structurally different expository texts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 25-41.
16. Lee, J. F., & Rodriguez, R. (1997). The effects of lexemic and morphological modifications on L2 reading comprehension and input processing. In W. R. Glass & A. T. Perez-Leroux (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish: Vol. 2. Production, processing, and comprehension (pp. 135-157). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
17. Lee, J., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Lee, J. F., & Wolf, D. (1997). A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the word-inferencing strategies of L1 and L2 readers. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 24-64.
19. Leow, R. (1997). The effects of input enhancement and text length on adult L2 readers? comprehension and intake in second language acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8, 151-182.
20. Leow, R. (1998). The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners? L2 development in SLA. Modern Language Journal, 82, 49-68.
21. Nagy, W., Anderson, R., & Herman, P. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237-270.
22. Nagy, W., Herman, P., & Anderson, R. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233-253.
23. Omaggio, A. (1979). Pictures and second language comprehension: Do they help? Foreign Language Annals, 12, 107-116.
24. Pulido, D. (2000). The impact of background knowledge and L2 verbal ability on incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading for adult learners of Spanish as a foreign language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
25. Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners? incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 589-619.
26. Rott, S. (2000). Relationships between the process of reading, word inferencing, and incidental word acquisition. In J. F. Lee & A. Valdman (Eds.), Form and meaning: Multiple perspectives (pp. 255-282). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
27. Shohamy, E. (1984). Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension. Language Testing, 1, 147-170.
28. Shook, D. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input-To-intake phenomenon. Applied Language Learning, 5, 57-93.
29. Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
30. VanPatten, B. (1990). Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 287-301.
31. VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. VanPatten, B., Lee, J., & Ballman, T. (2000). ?Sabias que . . . ? Beginning Spanish (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Wolf, D. (1993). A comparison of assessment tasks used to measure foreign language reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 77, 473-488.