Knowledge management and innovation in knowledge-based and high-tech industrial markets: The role of openness and absorptive capacity

Industrial Marketing Management

Volumn 47, Issue , 2015, Pages 143-146

  Martín de Castro, Gregorio ^a,b  

^a Ciudad Universitaria   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Absorptive capacity; High tech industries; Innovation; Knowledge management; Open innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930178223     PISSN: 00198501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.032     Document Type: Note

References (30)

1. Amara N., Landry R. Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from the 199 Statistics Canada Innovation Survey. Technovation 2005, 25(3):245-259.
2. Athaide G., Zang J. The determinants of seller-buyer interactions during new product development in technology-based industrial markets. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 2011, 28(Suppl. 1):146-158.
3. Barrales-Molina V., Martínez-López F.J., Gazquez-Abad J.C. Dynamic marketing capabilities: Toward an integrative framework. International Journal of Management Reviews 2014, 16(4):397-416.
4. Chen Y., Lin M.-J., Chang C.-H. The positive effect of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management 2009, 38:152-158.
5. Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology 2003, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
6. Chesbrough H., Vanhaverbeke W., West J. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Chiaroni D., Chiesa V., Frattini F. The open innovation journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation 2011, 31:34-43.
8. Clark K. Project scope and project performance: The effect of parts. Management Science 1989, 35(10):1247-1259.
9. Cohen W., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarlerly 1990, 35:153-176.
10. De Jong J., Freel M. Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms. Research Policy 2010, 39:47-54.
11. Dean A., Kretschmer M. Can ideas be capital? Factors of production in the postindustrial economy: A review and critique. Academy of Management Review 2007, 32:573-594.
12. Escribano A., Fosfuri A., Tribó J.A. Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy 2009, 38:96-105.
13. Grant R.M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 1996, 17:109-122.
14. Hakanen T. Co-creating integrated solutions within business networks: The KAM team as knowledge integrator. Industrial Marketing Management 2014, 43:1195-1203.
15. Huggins R. Forms of network resource: Knowledge access and the role of inter-firm networks. International Journal of Management Reviews 2010, 12(3):335-352.
16. Hughes M., Morgan R., Ireland R., Hughes P. Social capital and learning advantages: A problem of absorptive capacity. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2014, 8(3):214-233.
17. Jiménez-Jiménez D., Cegarra-Navarro J. The performance effect of organizational learning and market orientation. Industrial Marketing Management 2007, 36:694-708.
18. Lancioni R., Chandran R. Managing knowledge in industrial markets: New dimensions and challenges. Industrial Marketing Management 2009, 38:148-151.
19. Laursen K., Salter A. Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 2006, 27(2):131-150.
20. Lichtenthaler U. Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal 2009, 52:822-846.
21. Lin R.J., Che R.H., Ting C.Y. Turning knowledge management into innovation in the high-tech industry. Industrial Management & Data System 2012, 112(1):42-63.
22. Luthje C. Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field. An empirical study of sport-related product consumers. Technovation 2004, 24:683-695.
23. Martín-de Castro G., Delgado-Verde M., Navas-López J.E., López Sáez P. Towards an intellectual capital-based view of the firm. Origins and nature. Journal of Business Ethics 2011, 98:649-662.
24. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Reed K.K., Lubatkin M., Srinivasan N. Proposing and testing an intellectual capital-based view of the firm. Journal of Management Studies 2006, 43(4):867-893.
26. Spithoven A., Clarysee B., Knockaert M. Building absorptive capacity to organize inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation 2011, 31:10-21.
27. Subramaniam M., Youndt M.A. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 2005, 48:450-463.
28. Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 1997, 18(7):509-533.
29. Wallman J. Fields of opportunity: How marketers design the transaction game with transaction field maps. Industrial Marketing Management 2014, 43:726-735.
30. Zhara S., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 2002, 27(2):185-203.