Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey

Technovation

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 245-259

  Amara, Nabil ^a   Landry, Réjean ^a  

^a CANADIAN INSTITUTES OF HEALTH RESEARCH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Novelty of innovation; Sources of information; Statistics Canada Innovation Survey

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SURVEYS;

NOVELTY OF INNOVATION; SOURCE OF INFORMATION; STATISTICS CANADA INNOVATION SURVEYS;

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS;

EID: 10844264116     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00113-5     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Acs Z. Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change. 2000;Pinter, New York
2. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B. Innovation and Small Firms. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge
3. Ali A. Pioneering versus incremental innovation: review and research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 11:1994;46-61
4. Alic J.A. Cooperation in R&D. Technovation. 10:(5):1990;319-332
5. Amable B., Barré R., Boyer R. Les systèmes d'innovation à l'ère de la globalisation. 1997;Economica, Paris
6. Archibugi D., Pianta M. Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation. 16:(9):1996;451-468
7. Arvantis R., Vonortas N.S. Technology transfer and learning through strategic technical alliances: international experiences: introduction to the symposium. Journal of Technology Transfer. 25:(1):2000;9-12
8. Bidault F., Cummings T. Innovating through alliances: expectations and limitations. R&D Management. 24:(1):1994;33-45
9. Braczyk H.J., Cooke P., Heidenreich M. Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World. 1998;UCL Press, London
10. Bruce M., Leverick F., Littler D., Wilson D. Success factors for collaborative product development: a study of suppliers of information and communication technology. R&D Management. 25:(1):1995;33-44
11. Burt R.S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. 1992;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Burt R.S. Contingent value of social capital. Lesser E. Knowledge and Social Capital. Foundations and Applications. 2000;255-286 Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, MA
13. Callon M. The Dynamics of Technoeconomic Networks. Coombs R., et al. Technical Change and Company Strategies. 1992;Academic Press, London
14. Carter C., Williams B. Industry and Technical Progress. 1957;Oxford University Press, Oxford
15. Cohen D., Prusak L. In Good Company. How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. 2000;Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA
16. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35:1990;128-152
17. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal. 99:1989;569-596
18. Cooke P., Boekholt P., Tolding F. The Governance of Innovation in Europe: Regional Perspectives on Global Competitiveness. 2000;Pinter, New York
19. Cowan R., David P., Foray D. The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change. 9:(2):2000;211-254
20. Dasgupta P., Serageldin I. Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective. 2000;World Bank, Washington DC
21. Davenport T.H., Prusak L. Working Knowledge. 1998;Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA
22. De Bresson C., Amesse F. Networks of innovators: a review and introduction to the issue. Research Policy. 20:1991;363-379
23. De La Mothe J., Paquet G. Local and Regional Systems of Innovation. 1998;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam
24. Dogson M. The Management of Technological Learning: Lessons from a Biotechnology Company. 1991;Walter & Gruyter, Berlin
25. Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy. 11:(3):1982;147-162
26. Edquist D. Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. 1997;Printer, London
27. Edquist C., Hommen I. Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side. Technology in Society. 21:1999;63-79
28. Evangelista I., Perani G., Rapiti F., Archibugi D. Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing industry: some evidence from the Italian innovation survey. Research Policy. 26:1997;521-536
29. Fountain J.E. Social capital: its relationship to innovation in science and technology. Science and Public Policy. 25:(3):1998;103-115
30. Foray D. Characterizing the knowledge base: available and missing indicators. Knowledge Management in the Learning Society. 2000;OECD, Paris
31. Freeman C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy. 20:1991;499-514
32. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology. 78:1973;1360-1380
33. Green S.G., Gavin M.B., Aiman-Smith L. Assessing a multidimensional measure of radical technological innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 42:(3):1995;203-214
34. Griliches Z. R&D and productivity. Econometric results and measurement issues. Stoneman P. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. 1995;52-89 Oxford University Press, Cambridge, MA
35. Guellec, D., Pattison, B., 2000. Innovation surveys: a few lessons from OECD countries experience. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, Curitiba, Brazil, August 2000.
36. Hagedoorn J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering :interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal. 14:1993;371-385
37. Hagedoorn J., Link A.L., Vonortas N. Research partnerships. Research Policy. 29:2000;567-586
38. Holbrook J.A., Wolfe D.A. Innovation, Institution and Territory. Regional Innovation Systems in Canada. 2000;McGill-Queen's University Press, Kingston
39. Johansson B., Karlsson C., Westin L. Patterns in a Network Economy. 1994;Springer Verlag, Berlin
40. Johnson B. Institutional learning. Lundvall G.A. National Systems of Innovation. 1995;23-44 Printer, London
41. Knack S., Keefer P. Does social capital have economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. November:1997;1251-1288
42. Kleinknecht A., Reinjnen J.O.N. Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study. Research Policy. 21:1992;347-360
43. Kline S.J., Rosenberg N. An overview of innovation. Landau R., Rosenberg N. The Positive Sum Strategy. Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. 1986;275-306 National Academy Press, Washington DC
44. Landry R., Amara N. Creatuvity, innovation and business practices in the matter of knowledge management. De La Mothe J., Foray D. Knowledge Management in the Innovation Process: Business Practices and Technology Adoption. 2001;55-80 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA
45. Landry R., Amara N., Lamari M. Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 69:(7):1998;681-701
46. Le Bas C., Picard F., Suchecki B. Innovation technologique, comportement de réseaux et performances: une analyse sur données individuelles. Revue d'économie politique. 108:(5):1998;625-644
47. Lee M., Na D. Determinants of technical success in product development when innovative radicalness is considered. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 11:1994;62-68
48. Lengrand L., Chatrie I. Business Networks and the Knowledge-Driven Economy. 1999;European Commission, Brussels
49. Lesser E.L. Knowledge and Social Capital. Foundations and Applications. 2000;Butterworth Heinemann, Boston
50. Lundvall G.A. Innovation as an interactive process-from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. Dosi G., et al. Technical Change and Economic Theory. 1988;Pinter Publishers, London
51. Lundvall G.A. Explaining interfirm cooperation. The limits of transaction cost approach. Grabher G. The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. 1992;Routledge, London
52. Lundvall G.A. National Systems of Innovation. 1995;Printer, London
53. Maillat, D., 1999. Les milieux innovateurs. Sciences Humaines Hors Série no 8, (février-mars).
54. Malerba F. Learning by firms and incremental technical change. The Economic Journal. 102:(413):1992;8445-8459
55. Mariotti, S., Ricotta, E., 1986. Diversification, agreements among firms and innovative behaviour. Working paper.
56. Maskell P. Social capital,iInnovation and competitiveness. Field B.J., Schuller T. Social Capital. 1999;Oxford University Press, Oxford
57. Nelson R.R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. 1993;Oxford University Press, Oxford
58. Niosi J. Canada's National System of Innovation. 2000;McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal
59. Niosi J. Flexible Innovation. Technological Alliances in Canadian Industry. 1995;McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal
60. OECD, 1992. OECD Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data-Oslo Manual. Paris: OECD. (1997 revised edition).
61. Pianta, M., Sirilli, G., 1998. The use of innovation surveys for policy evaluation. IDEA Paper Series, no 2, STEP Group.
62. Porter M. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review. December:1999;77-90
63. Porter M. Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly. 14:(1):2000;15-34
64. Powell W.W. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior. 12:1990;295-336
65. Prusak L. Knowledge in Organizations. 1997;Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MA
66. Putnam R.D. Making Democracy Work. 1993;Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
67. Romijn, H., Albu, M., 2001. Explaining innovativeness in small high-technology firms in the united Kingdom. Working Paper 01.01. Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies, Eidenhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
68. Rosenberg N. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. 1982;Cambridge University Press, New York
69. Rothwell R. The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms. R&D Management. 7:(3):1977;191-206
70. Rothwell R. Issues in user-producer relations in the innovation process: the role of government. International Journal of Technology Management. 9-5-6-7:1994;629-649
71. Sandven, T., Smith, K., 1998. Using community innovation survey data for empirical analysis-data reliability and issues for analysts. IDEA Paper Series, no 4, STEP Group.
72. Schaan, S., Anderson, F., 2001. Innovation in Canadian manufacturing: national estimates. Cat. No. 88F0006XIE01010, Statistics Canada.
73. Storper M. The Regional World. Territorial Development in a Global Economy. 1997;The Guilford Press, New York
74. Tether, B., 2000. Who co-operates for innovation within the supply-chain, and why? An analysis of the United Kingdom's innovation survey. Cric discussion paper no 35. Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, The University of Manchester.
75. Teubal M., Yinnon T., Zuscovitch E. Networks and market creation. Research Policy. 20:1991;381-392
76. Townsend, J., Henwood, F., Thomas, G., Pavitt, K., Wyatt, S., 1981 Innovations in Britain since 1945. Occasional paper no. 16. SPRU, University of Sussex.
77. Venkataraman S. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. Katz J., Brokhaus R. Advances in Entrepreneurship. Firm Emergence, and Growth. 1997;JAI Press, San Francisco, CA
78. Veryzer R.W. Jr. Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 15:1998;304-332
79. Von Hippel E. The dominant role of the user in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy. 5:(3):1976;212-239
80. Von Hippel E. The Sources of Innovation. 1988;Oxford University Press, Oxford
81. Von Krogh G., Ichijo K., Nonaka I. Enabling Knowledge Creation. 2000;Oxford University Press, Oxford
82. Wallmark J.T., McQueen D.H. One hundred major Swedish technical innovations, from 1945 to 1980. Research Policy. 20:1991;325-344