Virtual dissection CT colonography: Evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection

Radiology

Volumn 248, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 860-868

  Hock, Danielle ^a   Ouhadi, Roxanne ^a   Materne, Roland ^a   Aouchria, Amir Samy ^a   Mancini, Isabelle ^a   Broussaud, Thomas ^a   Magotteaux, Paul ^a   Nchimi, Alain ^a  

^a Clinique Saint Joseph   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; INTESTINE POLYP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK FACTOR; ROC CURVE; SEX DIFFERENCE; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 51549098869     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482070895     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Johnson CD, Dachman AH. CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 2000;216(2):331-341.
2. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349(23):2191-2200.
3. Nicholson FB, Barro JL, Bartram CI, et al. The role of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100(10):2315-2323.
4. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, Halligan S, Stoker J. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2007;17(2):575-579.
5. Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005;237(3):893-904.
6. Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 2000;47(1):126-130.
7. McFarland EG, Brink JA, Pilgram TK, et al. Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques. Radiology 2001;218(2):375-383.
8. Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005;142(8):635-650.
9. Neri E, Vannozzi F, Vagli P, Bardine A, Bartolozzi C. Time efficiency of CT colonography: 2D vs 3D visualization. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2006;30(3):175-180.
10. Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174(6):1543-1549.
11. Jensch S, van Gelder RE, Florie J, et al. Performance of radiographers in the evaluation of CT colonographic images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(3):W249-W255.
12. Gluecker T, Meuwly JY, Pescatore P, et al. Effect of investigator experience in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2002;12(6):1405-1409.
13. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S, et al. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 2006;131(6):1690-1699.
14. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Burling D, et al. CT colonography: effect of experience and training on reader performance. Eur Radiol 2004;14(6):1025-1033.
15. Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW, et al. Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 2003;228(3):878-885.
16. Rottgen R, Fischbach F, Plotkin M, et al. CT colonography using different reconstruction modi. Clin Imaging 2005;29(3):195-199.
17. Silva AC, Wellnitz CV, Hara AK. Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT colonography: unraveling the colon to search for lesions. RadioGraphics 2006;26(6):1669-1686.
18. Johnson KT, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG, MacCarty RL, Summers RL. CT colonography using 360-degree virtual dissection: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(1):90-95.
19. Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M, Malley JD, Johnson CD. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 2002;225(2):391-399.
20. Mani A, Napel S, Paik DS, et al. Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a "first reader" paradigm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004;28(3):318-326.
21. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology 2006;239(3):759-767.
22. Shi R, Schraedley-Desmond P, Napel S, et al. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection. Radiology 2006;239(3):768-776.
23. Morris JA, Gardner MJ. Epidemiological studies: relative risks, attributable risks and odds ratios. In: Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ, eds. Statistics with confidence. 2nd ed. Bristol, England: BMJ Books, 2000; 57-60.
24. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148(3):839-843.
25. Fidler JL, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, et al. Understanding interpretive errors in radiologists learning computed tomography colonography. Acad Radiol 2004;11(7):750-756.
26. Chan HP, Doi K, Vyborny CJ, et al. Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: the potential of computer-aided diagnosis. Invest Radiol 1990;25(10):1102-1110.
27. Chan HP, Sahiner B, Helvie MA, et al. Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. Radiology 1999;212(3):817-827.
28. Ko JP, Betke M. Chest CT: automated nodule detection and assessment of change over time - preliminary experience. Radiology 2001;218(1):267-273.
29. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Metz CE. Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 2002;224(2):560-568.
30. Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A, et al. Pulmonary nodules at chest CT: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists' detection performance. Radiology 2004;230(2):347-352.
31. Summers RM, Beaulieu CF, Pusanik LM, et al. Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology 2000;216(1):284-290.
32. Ling SH, Summers RM, Loew MH, McCollough CH, Johnson CD. Computer-aided detection of polyps in a colon phantom: effect of scan orientation, polyp size, collimation, and dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26(6):1013-1018.
33. Bogoni L, Cathier P, Dundar M, et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) for CT colonography: a tool to address a growing need. Br J Radiol 2005;78(spec issue 1):S57-S62.
34. Hoppe H, Quattropani C, Spreng A, Mattich J, Netzer P, Dinkel HP. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(5):1151-1158.
35. Carrascosa P, Capuñay C, López EM, Ulla M, Castiglioni R, Carrascosa J. Multidetector CT colonoscopy: evaluation of the perspective-filet view virtual colon dissection technique for the detection of elevated lesions. Abdom Imaging 2007;32(5):582-588.
36. Kim SH, Lee JM, Eun HW, et al. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Radiology 2007;244(3):852-864.
37. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology CT Colonography Group Investigators. Effect of directed training on reader performance for CT colonography: multicenter study. Radiology 2007;242(1):152-161.
38. Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG, et al. CT colonography interpretation times: effect of reader experience, fatigue, and scan findings in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 2006;16(8):1745-1749.
39. McFarland EG, Pilgram TK, Brink JA, et al. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance. Radiology 2002;225(2):380-390.