When and Why Might a Computer-aided Detection (CAD) System Interfere with Visual Search? An Eye-tracking Study

Academic Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1260-1267

  Drew, Trafton ^a,b   Cunningham, Corbin ^b   Wolfe, Jeremy M ^a,b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer aided detection; Image perception; Observer performance

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION SYSTEM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865770510     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Rao V.M., Levin D.C., Parker L., et al. How widely is computer-aided detection used in screening and diagnostic mammography?. J Am Coll Radiol 2010, 7:802-805.
2. Fenton J.J., Abraham L., Taplin S.H., et al. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. J Nat Cancer Inst 2011, 103:1152-1161.
3. Dorrius M.D., Weide M.C.J., van Ooijen P.M.A., et al. Computer-aided detection in breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2011, 21:1600-1608.
4. Philpotts L.E. Can computer-aided detection be detrimental to mammographic interpretation?. Radiology 2009, 253:17-22.
5. Birdwell R.L. The preponderance of evidence supports computer-aided detection for screening mammography. Radiology 2009, 253:9-16.
6. Burgess A.E., Jacobson F.L., Judy P.F. Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys 2001, 28:419-437.
7. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vis 1997, 10:433-436.
8. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vis 1997, 10:437-442.
9. Najemnik J., Geisler W.S. Eye movement statistics in humans are consistent with an optimal search strategy. J Vis 2008, 8:1-14.
10. Kundel H.L., Nodine C.F., Krupinski E.A. Searching for lung nodules-visual dwell indicates locations of false-positive and false-negative decisions. Invest Radiol 1989, 24:472-478.
11. Taplin S.H., Rutter C.M., Lehman C.D. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006, 187:1475-1482.
12. Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comp Med Imaging and Graphics 2007, 31:198-211.
13. Nishikawa R.M. Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography. Comp Med Imaging and Graphics 2007, 31:224-235.
14. Pisano E.D., Gatsonis C., Hendrick E., et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. New Engl J Med 2005, 353:1773-1783.
15. Gur D., Bandos A.I., Fuhrman C.R., et al. The prevalence effect in a laboratory environment: changing the confidence ratings. Acad Radiol 2007, 14:49-53.
16. Samulski M., Hupse R., Boetes C., et al. Using computer-aided detection in mammography as a decision support. Eur Radiol 2010, 20:2323-2330.
17. Alberdi E., Povyakalo A., Strigini L., et al. Effects of incorrect computer-aided detection (CAD) output on human decision-making in mammography. Acad Radiol 2004, 11:909-918.
18. Berbaum K., Franken E., Caldwell R.T., et al. Satisfaction of search in traditional medical imaging. The handbook of medical image perception and techniques 2010, 107-138. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. E. Samei, E.A. Krupinski (Eds.).
19. Berbaum K.S., Franken E.A., Dorfman D.D., et al. Cause of satisfaction of search effects in contrast studies of the abdomen. Acad Radiol 1996, 3:815-826.