International scientists' priorities for research on pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 576-587

  Rudd, Murray A ^a   Ankley, Gerald T ^b   Boxall, Alistair B A ^a   Brooks, Bryan W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^c BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental quality; Environmental science; PPCP; Priorities; Prioritization; Research orientation

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC; DRUG; POLLUTANT;

ANALYSIS; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; POLLUTANT; RESEARCH; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOXICITY;

COSMETICS; DATA COLLECTION; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; RESEARCH;

EID: 84929995901     PISSN: 15513793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1551     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB. 2003. Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Environ Sci Technol 37:94A-101A.
2. Ankley GT, Brooks BW, Huggett DB, Sumpter PJ. 2007. Repeating history: Pharmaceuticals in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 41:8211-8217.
3. Backhaus T, Porsbring T, Arrhenius Å, Brosche S, Johansson P, Blanck H. 2011. Single-substance and mixture toxicity of five pharmaceuticals and personal care products to marine periphyton communities. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:2030-2040.
4. Benotti MJ, Trenholm RA, Vanderford BJ, Holady JC, Stanford BD, Snyder SA. 2008. Pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds in U.S. drinking water. Environ Sci Technol 43:597-603.
5. Boxall ABA, Fogg LA, Blackwell PA, Blackwell P, Kay P, Pemberton EJ, Croxford A. 2004. Veterinary medicines in the environment. In: Whitacre DM, editor. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology. New York (NY): Springer. p 1-91.
6. Boxall ABA, Rudd MA, Brooks BW, Caldwell DJ, Choi K, Hickmann S, Innes E, Ostapyk K, Staveley JP, Verslycke T, et al. 2012. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: What are the big questions? Environ Health Perspect 120:1221-1229.
7. Brooks BW, Ankley GT, Boxall ABA, Rudd MA. 2013. Toward sustainable environmental quality: A call to prioritize global research needs. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9:179-180.
8. Brown LE, Mitchell G, Holden J, Folkard A, Wright N, Beharry-Borg N, Berry G, Brierley B, Chapman P, Clarke SJ, et al. 2010. Priority water research questions as determined by UK practitioners and policy makers. Sci Total Environ 409:256-266.
9. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8086-8091.
10. Daughton CG. 2003. Cradle-to-cradle stewardship of drugs for minimizing their environmental disposition while promoting human health. I. Rationale for and avenues toward a green pharmacy. Environ Health Perspect 111:757-774.
11. Daughton CG, Ternes TA. 1999. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: Agents of subtle change? Environ Health Perspect 107(Suppl 6):907.
12. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. 2009. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. 3rd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons. 512 pp.
13. Fleishman E, Blockstein DE, Hall JA, Mascia MB, Rudd MA, Scott JM, Sutherland WJ, Bartuska AM, Brown AG, Christen CA, et al. 2011. Top 40 priorities for science to inform US conservation and management policy. BioScience 61:290-300.
14. Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, Coast J. 2007. Best-worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it. J Health Econ 26:171-189.
15. Hagenaars JA. 1988. Latent structure models with direct effects between indicators: Local dependence models. Socio Meth Res 16:379-405.
16. Kookana RS, Moggridge B, Mihinui R, Gray B, Northcott G, Boxall ABA. 2013. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: Cultural and spiritual perspectives. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9:164-166.
17. Magidson J. 2005. SI-CHAID 4.0 User's Guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.
18. Magidson J, Vermunt JK. 2004. Latent class models. In: Kaplan D, editor. The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications. p 175-198.
19. McDonough W, Braungart M, Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB. 2003. Applying the principles of green engineering to cradle-to-cradle design. Environ Sci Technol 37:434A-441A.
20. Pretty J, Sutherland WJ, Ashby J, Auburn J, Baulcombe D, Bell M, Bentley J, Bickersteth S, Brown K, Burke J, et al. 2010. The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. Int J Agri Sustain 8:219-236.
21. Rahman M, Yanful E, Jasim S. 2009. Endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the aquatic environment: Implications for the drinking water industry and global environmental health. J Water Health 7:224-243.
22. Rudd MA. 2011a. How research-prioritization exercises affect conservation policy. Conserv Biol 25:860-866.
23. Rudd MA. 2011b. Scientists' opinions on the global status and management of biological diversity. Conserv Biol 25:1165-1175.
24. Rudd MA, Beazley KF, Cooke SJ, Fleishman E, Lane DE, Mascia MB, Roth R, Tabor G, Bakker JA, Bellefontaine T, et al. 2011. Generation of priority research questions to inform conservation policy and management at a national level. Conserv Biol 25:476-484.
25. Rudd MA, Fleishman E. 2014. Policymakers' and scientists' ranks of the Top 40 priorities for science to inform resource-management policy in the United States. BioScience 64:219-228.
26. Rudd MA, Lawton RN. 2013. Scientists' prioritization of global coastal research questions. Mar Policy 39:101-111.
27. Sawtooth Software. 2009. The CBC/HB system for Hierarchical Bayes estimation. Version 5.0 Technical Paper. Sequim (WA): Sawtooth Software.
28. Scarpa R, Thiene M. 2005. Destination choice models for rock climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A latent-class approach based on intensity of preferences. Land Econ 81:426-444.
29. Snyder S, Benotti M. 2010. Endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals: implications for water sustainability. Water Sci Technol 66:145-154.
30. Sutherland WJ, Adam WM, Aronson RB, Aveling R, Blackburn TM, Broad S, Ceballos G, Côté IM, Cowling RM, da Fonseca GAB, et al. 2009. One hundred questions of importance to the conservation of global biological diversity. Conserv Biol 23:557-567.
31. Sutherland WJ, Bellingan L, Bellingham JR, Blackstock JJ, Bloomfield RM, Bravo M, Cadman VM, Cleevely DD, Clements A, Cohen AS, et al. 2012. A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda. PLoS ONE 7:e31824.
32. Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Mascia MB, Pretty J, Rudd MA. 2011. Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol Evol 2:238-247.
33. Touraud E, Roig B, Sumpter JP, Coetsier C. 2011. Drug residues and endocrine disruptors in drinking water: Risk for humans? Int J Hyg Environ Health 214:437-441.
34. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. 2002. Latent class cluster analysis. In: Hagenaars JA, McCutcheon AL, editors. Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p 89-106.
35. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. 2005. Technical guide for Latent GOLD 4.0: Basic and advanced. Belmont (MA): Statistical Innovations.
36. Wedel M, Kamakura WA. 2000. Market segmentation: Conceptual and methodological foundations. 2nd ed. Dordrecht (NL): Kluwer Academic. 382 pp.