A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Sutherland, William J ^a   Bellingan, Laura ^b   Bellingham, Jim R ^a   Blackstock, Jason J ^c,d   Bloomfield, Robert M ^e   Bravo, Michael ^a   Cadman, Victoria M ^f   Cleevely, David D ^a   Clements, Andy ^g   Cohen, Anthony S ^h   Cope, David R ⁱ   Daemmrich, Arthur A ^j   Devecchi, Cristina ^k   Anadon, Laura Diaz ^l   Denegri, Simon ^m   Doubleday, Robert ^a   Dusic, Nicholas R ⁿ   Evans, Robert J ^o   Feng, Wai Y ^a   Godfray, H Charles J ^p   Harris, Paul ^q   Hartley, Sue E ^r   Hester, Alison J ^s   Holmes, John ^t   Hughes, Alan ^u   Hulme, Mike ^v   Irwin, Colin ^w   Jennings, Richard C ^a   Kass, Gary S ^x   Littlejohns, Peter ^y   Marteau, Theresa M ^z   McKee, Glenn ^aa   Millstone, Erik P ^ab   Nuttall, William J ^u   Owens, Susan ^a   Parker, Miles M ^aa   Pearson, Sarah ^ac   Petts, Judith ^ad   Ploszek, Richard ^ae   Pullin, Andrew S ^af   Reid, Graeme ^aa   Richards, Keith S ^a   Robinson, John G ^ag   Shaxson, Louise ^ah   Sierra, Leonor ^ai   Smith, Beck G ^aj   Spiegelhalter, David J ^a   Stilgoe, Jack ^ak   Stirling, Andy ^aa   Tyler, Christopher P ^a   Winickoff, David E ^al   Zimmern, Ron L ^am   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL SOCIETY OF BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c CENTRE FOR INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE INNOVATION   (Canada)

^d INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^e DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^f Charles Darwin House   (United Kingdom)

^g THE NUNNERY   (United Kingdom)

^h OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology   (United Kingdom)

^j HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF NORTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^l HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m Ovarian Cancer Action   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ PFIZER GLOBAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (United Kingdom)

^o CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^p UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^q AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^r UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^s SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^t UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^u UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^v UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^w DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^x NATURAL ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^y NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^z UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^aa University of Southampton ^*  (United Kingdom)

^ab UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^ac AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^ad UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^ae ROYAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING   (United Kingdom)

^af BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^ag WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY   (United States)

^ah Delta Partnership Central Hall Westminster   (United Kingdom)

^ai Sense About Science USA   (United Kingdom)

^aj Biochemical Society   (United Kingdom)

^ak Royal Society   (United Kingdom)

^al UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^am PHG FOUNDATION   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GOVERNMENT; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; POLICY; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH; SCIENCE POLICY; THEORETICAL STUDY; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; ENGLAND; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH;

EID: 84861027881     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031824     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rothschild Report (1971) The organisation and management of government research and development. (Cmnd. 4814) London HMSO.
2. Jasanoff S, (1994) The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
3. Clark TW, (2002) The Policy Process Yale University Press.
4. Cohen S, (2006) Understanding Environmental Policy Columbia University Press.
5. Pielke RA, (2007) The Honest Broker Cambridge University Press.
6. Hulme M, (2009) Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity Cambridge University Press.
7. Phillips NA, (2000) The BSE inquiry London The Stationery Office.
8. Bijker W, Bal R, Hendriks R, (2009) The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies. MIT Press.
9. Owens S, (2005) Making a difference: some reflections on environmental research and policy. T I Brit Geogr 30: 287-292.
10. Owens S, (2011) Knowledge, advice and influence: the role of the UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 1970-2009. In: Lentsch J, Weingart P, editors. The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance Cambridge Cambridge University Press pp. 73-101.
11. Staum MS, (1982) Images of Paternal Power: Intellectuals and Social Change in the French National Institute. Can J Hist 17: 425-445.
12. Hilbert D, (1902) Mathematical problems. B Am Math Soc 8: 437-479.
13. Hoffman P, (1998) The Man who Loved only Numbers: The Story of Paul Erdös and the Search for Mathematical Truth New York Hyperion.
14. Steffen W, Sanderson A, Tyson PD, Jäger J, Matson PA, et al. (2004) Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure Berlin Springer.
15. Committee on Strategic Directions for the Geographical Sciences in the Next Decade, National Research Council of the National Academies (2010) Understanding the Changing Planet: Strategic Directions for the Geographical Sciences Washington DC, USA National Academies Press.
16. ICSU (2010) Earth System Science for Global Sustainability: The Grand Challenges. International Council for Science, Paris.
17. Sutherland WJ, Armstrong-Brown S, Armsworth PR, Brereton T, Brickland J, et al. (2006) The identification of one hundred ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. J Appl Ecol 43: 617-627.
18. Sutherland WJ, Adams WM, Aronson RB, Aveling R, Blackburn TM, et al. (2009) An assessment of the 100 questions of greatest importance to the conservation of global biological diversity. Conserv Biol 23: 557-567.
19. Sutherland WJ, Albon SD, Allison H, Armstrong-Brown S, Bailey MJ, (2010) The identification of priority opportunities for UK nature conservation policy. J Appl Ecol 47: 955-965.
20. Morton SR, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Lindenmayer DB, Olson MH, Hughes L, et al. (2009) The big ecological questions inhibiting effective environmental management in Australia. Austral Ecol 34: 1-9.
21. Fleishman E, Blockstein DE, Hall JA, Mascia MB, Rudd MA, et al. (2011) Top 40 priorities for science to inform conservation and management policy in the United States. BioScience 61: 290-300.
22. Pretty JJ, Sutherland WJ, Ashby J, Auburn J, Baulcombe D, et al. (2010) The top 100 questions for global agriculture and food. Int J Agric Sustain 8: 219-236.
23. Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Mascia MB, Pretty P, Rudd MA, (2011) Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol Evol 2: 238-247.
24. DEFRA (2010) UK marine science strategy: shaping, supporting, co-ordinating and enabling the delivery of world class marine science for the UK, 2010-2025. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs on behalf of the Marine Science Co-ordination Committee.
25. Gieryn TF, (1983) Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. Am Soc Rev 48: 781-795.
26. Star SL, Griesemer JR, (1989) Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Soc Stud Sci 19: 387-420.
27. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M, (2001) Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty Cambridge Polity Press.
28. Oppenheimer M, (2011) What Roles Can Scientists Play in Public Discourse? Eos 92: 133-40.
29. Rudd MA, Beazley KF, Cooke SJ, Fleishman E, Lane DE, et al. (2011) Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National Level. Conserv Biol 25: 476-484.