Referendums and the European union: A comparative inquiry

Referendums and the European Union: A Comparative Inquiry

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-281

  Mendez, Fernando ^a   Mendez, Mario ^b   Triga, Vasiliki ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929713182     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139524117     Document Type: Book

References (420)

1. Ackerman, B. (1991). We the People. Volume 1, Foundations. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
2. Ackerman, B. and Katyal, N. (1995). “Our Unconventional Founding”. University of Chicago Law Review, 62: 475–573.
3. Albi, A. (2003). “EU Accession Referendums in the Baltic States”. Tilburg Foreign Law Review, 11(3): 653–70.
4. Albi, A. (2005). EU Enlargement and the Constitutions of Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
5. Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (2007). The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
6. Alesina, A., Angeloni, I. and Schuknecht, L. (2005). “What Does the European Union Do?”. Public Choice, 123(3): 275–319.
7. Alkema, E. A. (2011). “Netherlands”. In D. Shelton (ed.), International Law and Domestic Legal Systems. Oxford University Press, pp. 407–28.
8. Almond, G. A. and Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park: Sage.
9. Altman, D. (2005). “Democracia Directa en el Continente Americano: ¿Auto-Legitimación Gubernamental o Censura Ciudadana?” Polútica y Gobierno, 12: 203–32.
10. Altman, D. (2011). Direct Democracy Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Amar, A. R. (1994). “The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V”. Columbia Law Review, 94: 457–508.
12. Amar, A. R. (2005). America's Constitution: A Biography. New York: Random House.
13. Anderson, L. M. (2004). “The Institutional Basis of Secessionist Politics: Federalism and Secession in the United States”. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 34(2): 1–18.
14. Anderson, S. V. (1965). “Supranational Delegation Clauses in Scandinavian Constitutions”. The Western Political Quarterly, 18(4): 840–7.
15. Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
16. Armstrong, K. A. (2013). “The New Governance of EU Fiscal Discipline”. European Law Review, 38(5): 601–17.
17. Arnold, R. (2007). “Germany and the EU Constitutional Treaty”. In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 57–66.
18. Arnull, A., (2011). “Ireland and the Lisbon Treaty: All's Well That Ends Well?”. In Arnull, A., Barnard, C., Dougan, M. and Spaventa, E. (eds.), A Constitutional Order of States: Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 39–57.
19. Aroney, N. (2009). The Constitution of a Federal Commonwealth: The Making and Meaning of the Australian Constitution. Cambridge University Press.
20. Arter, D. (1995). “The EU Referendum in Finland on 16 October 1994: A Vote for the West, not for Maastricht”. Journal of Common Marker Studies, 33(3): 361–87.
21. Auer, A. (1996). “La justice constitutionnelle et la démocratie référendaire”. In Commission Européenne pour la démocratie par le droit, Justice constitutionnelle et démocratie référendaire, Council of Europe: Strasbourg, pp. 167–84.
22. Auer, A. (2007). “National Referendums in the Process of European Integration: Time for Change”. In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratifications and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 267–72.
23. Auer, A. and Flauss, J.-F. (1997). Le Référendum Européen. Brussels: Bruylant.
24. Auer, A., Malinverni, G. and Hottelier, M. (2006). Droit constitutionnel suisse, Vol. 1, L’Etat. Berne: Stampfli.
25. Austin, A. (2005). “Provincial Interests and Political Integration: Voting in the French Maastricht Referendum”. CERGE-EI Working Paper Series No. 281.
26. Bakker, R., Jolly, S. and Polk, J. (2012). “Complexity in the European Party Space: Exploring Dimensionality with Experts”. European Union Politics 13(2): 219–45.
27. Baratta, R. (2013). “Legal Issues of the ‘Fiscal Compact’ – Searching for a Mature Democratic Governance of the Euro”. In de Witte, B., Heritier, A. and Trechsel, A. (eds.), The Euro Crisis and the State of European Democracy: Contributions from the 2012 EUDO Dissemination Conference. Florence: European University Institute, pp. 31–63.
28. Barber, B. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.
29. Bardi, L., Bressanelli, E., Calossi, E., Gagatec, W., Mair, P. and Pizzimenti, E. (2010). How to Create a Transnational Party System. Brussels: European Parliament (Directorate General for Internal Policies).
30. Barrett, G. (2009). “Building a Swiss Chalet in an Irish Legal Landscape? Referendums on European Union Treaties in Ireland and the Impact of Supreme Court Jurisprudence”. European Constitutional Law Review, 5: 32–70.
31. Barrero Ortega, A. and Sobrino Guijarro, I. (2013). “Constitutional Change in Spain”. In Contiades, X. (ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 299–324.
32. Baquero Cruz, J. (2009). “Between Unanimity and Utopia: Constitutional Change in the Union”. In Baquero Cruz, J. and Closa, C. (eds.), European Integration from Rome to Berlin: 1957–2007. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang, pp. 211–28.
33. Beaud, O. (2007). Théorie de la Fédération. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
34. Bednar, J. (2009). The Robust Federation: Principles of Design. Cambridge University Press.
35. Behrendt, C. (2013). “The Process of Constitutional Amendment in Belgium”. In Contiades, X. (ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 35–50.
36. Bellamy, R. (2013). “‘An Ever Closer Union Among the Peoples of Europe’: Republican Intergovernmentalism and Demoicratic Representation within the EU”. Journal of European Integration, 25(5): 499–516.
37. Bellamy, R. and Castiglione, D. (2013). “Three Models of Democracy, Political Community and Representation in the EU”. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(2): 206–23.
38. Besselink, L. F. M. (2007). “Constitutional Referenda in the Netherlands: A Debate in the Margin”. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 11.1.
39. Beukers, T. (2013). “The Eurozone Crisis and the Legitimacy of Differentiated Integration”. In de Witte, B., Heritier, A. and Trechsel, A. (eds.), The Euro Crisis and the State of European Democracy: Contributions from the 2012 EUDO Dissemination Conference. Florence: European University Institute, pp. 7–30.
40. Beuter, R. (1994). “Germany and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty”. In Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S. (eds.), The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty. London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 87–112.
41. Biering, P. (2008). “Denmark”. In Koeck, H. F. and Karollus, M. M. (eds.), Preparing the European Union for the Future? Necessary Revisions of Primary Law after the Non-ratification of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe. Vienna: Nomos, pp. 69–79.
42. Biering, P. (2013). “The Case of the Missing Referendum”. In Christensen, P., Danielsen, J. H., Christoffersen, J. and Ebdrup, S. (eds.), Max Sørensen 100 år. Copenhagen: DJØF Forlag.
43. Bjørklund, T. (1982). “The Demand for Referendum: When Does it Arise and When Does it Succeed?”. Scandinavian Political Studies, 5(3): 237–59.
44. Blondel, J. (1997). “Political Opposition in the Contemporary World”. Government and Opposition, 32(4): 462–86.
45. Blutman, L. and Chronowski, N. (2011). “Hungarian Constitutional Court: Keeping Aloof from European Union Law”. Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, 5(3): 329–48.
46. Bogdanor, V. (1994). “Western Europe”. In Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (eds.), Referendums around the World: The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. London: Macmillan, pp. 24–97.
47. Bogdanor, V. (2007). “Legitimacy, Accountability and Democracy in the European Union”. The Federal Trust Working Group Report on ‘Democracy, Accountability and Legitimacy in the EU’.
48. Bogdanor, V. (2009). The New British Constitution. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
49. Bowler, S. and Donovan, T. (1998). Demanding Choices: Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan Press.
50. Bribosia, H. (2009). “Réviser les traités européens: Plaidoyer en faveur de la suppression du veto”. Notre Europe, Policy Paper 37.
51. Buch, R. and Hansen, K. M. (2002). “The Danes and Europe: From EC 1972 to Euro 2000 – Elections, Referendums and Attitudes”. Scandinavian Political Studies, 25(1): 1–26.
52. Budge, I. (1996). The New Challenge in Direct Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
53. Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (1994). Referendums around the World. The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. London: Macmillan.
54. Cappelletti, M., Seccombe, M. and Weiler, J. (1986). Integration through Law: Europe and the American Federal Experience. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
55. Carey, S. (2002). “Undivided Loyalties: Is National Identity an Obstacle to European Integration?”. European Union Politics, 3(4): 387–413.
56. Carney, G. (2006). The Constitutional Systems of the Australian States and Territories. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
57. Carrubba, C. J. (2001). “The Electoral Connection in European Union Politics”. Journal of Politics, 63(1): 141–58.
58. Cartabia, M. (2007). “The Ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty in Italy”. In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratifications and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 39–44.
59. Chalmers, D., Monti, G. and Davies, G. (2010). European Union Law: Text and Materials (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press.
60. Cheneval, F. (2007). “‘Caminante, no hay camino, se hace camino al andar’: EU Citizenship, Direct Democracy and Treaty Ratification”. European Law Journal, 13(5): 647–63.
61. Cheneval, F. (2011). The Government of the Peoples: On the Idea and Principles of Multilateral Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
62. Cheneval, F. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2012). “The Case for Demoicracy in the European Union”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2): 334–50.
63. Choudhry, S. and Gaudreault-DesBiens, J. (2007). “Frank Iacobucci as Constitution Maker: From the Quebec Veto Reference to the Meech Lake Accord and the Quebec Secession Reference”. University of Toronto Law Journal, 57: 165.
64. Christin, T., Hug, S. and Sciarini, P. (2002). “Interests and Information in Referendum Voting: An Analysis of Swiss Voters”. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6): 759–76.
65. Christin, T. and Trechsel, A. (2002). “Joining the EU? Explaining Public Opinion in Switzerland”. European Union Politics 3(4): 415–43.
66. Chryssogonos, K. (2001). “The European Union and the Greek Constitutional Order”. In Kellerman, A. E., de Zwaan, J. W. and Czuczai, J. (eds.), EU Enlargement – The Constitutional Impact at EU and National Level. The Hague: TMC Asser Institute, pp. 141–6.
67. Cini, M. (2002). “A Divided Nation: Polarization and the Two-Party System in Malta”. South European Society and Politics, 7(1): 6–23.
68. Cini, M. (2004). “Culture, Institutions and Campaign Effects: Explaining the Outcome of Malta's EU Accession Referendum”. West European Politics, 27(4): 584–602.
69. Claes, M. (2005). “Constitutionalizing Europe at its Source: The ‘European Clauses’ in the National Constitutions: Evolution and Typology”. Yearbook of European Law, 24(1): 87.
70. Claes, M., de Visser, M. C. B. F., Leenknegt, G. and Senden, L. A. J. (2008). “Ceci n’est pas une constitution: Report on the Netherlands”. In Koeck, H. F. and Karollus, M. M. (eds.), Preparing the European Union for the Future? Necessary Revisions of Primary Law after the Non-ratification of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe. Vienna: Nomos, pp. 243–80.
71. Closa, C. (2007). “Why Convene Referendums? Explaining Choices in EU Constitutional Politics”. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(8): 1311–32.
72. Closa, C. (2013a). The Politics of Ratification of EU Treaties. London: Routledge.
73. Closa, C. (2013b). “National Higher Courts and the Ratification of EU Treaties”. West European Politics, 36:1, 100–23.
74. Contiades, X. (2013). Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London and New York: Routledge.
75. Corthaut, T. (2008). “Belgium”. In Koeck, H. F. and Karollus, M. M. (eds.), Preparing the European Union for the Future? Necessary Revisions of Primary Law after the Non-ratification of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe. Vienna: Nomos, pp. 13–18.
76. Craig, P. (2010). The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics, and Treaty Reform. Oxford University Press.
77. Craig, P. (2011). “The European Union Act 2011: Locks, Limits and Legality”. Common Market Law Review, 48: 1881.
78. Craig, P. (2012). “The Stability, Coordination and Governance Treaty: Principle, Politics and Pragmatism”. European Law Review, 37: 231.
79. Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (2011). EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials (5th edn). Oxford University Press.
80. Cronin, T. E. (1989). Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum and Recall. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
81. Crum, B. (2013). “Saving the Euro at the Cost of Democracy?” Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(4): 614–30.
82. Czuczai, J. (2007). “Ratification of the European Constitution in Hungary: Problems and Challenges”. In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 29–38.
83. Dahl, R. A. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. University of Chicago Press.
84. Dahl, R. A. (1966). Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
85. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
86. Danielsen, J. H. (2010). “One of Many National Constraints on European Integration: Section 20 of Danish Constitution”. European Public Law, 16(2): 181.
87. Dashwood, A. A., Dougan, M., Rodger, B., Spaventa, E. and Wyatt, D. (2011). Wyatt and Dashwood's European Union Law (6th edn). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
88. de Bastos, G. M. (1993). “La sélectivité de la participation”. In Kriesi, H. (ed.) Citoyenneté et démocratie directe. Zurich: Seismo, pp. 167–88.
89. de Búrca, G. (2009). “The Lisbon Treaty No-Vote: An Irish Problem or a European Problem?”. University College Dublin Law Research Paper No. 03/2009.
90. de Búrca, G. (2010). “If at First You Don’t Succeed: Vote, Vote Again: Analyzing the ‘Second Referendum’ Phenomenon in EU Treaty Change”. Fordham International Law Journal, 33: 1472.
91. de Búrca, G. and de Witte, B. (2002). “The Delimitation of Powers between the EU and its Member States”. In Arnull, A. and Wincott, D. (eds.) Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford University Press, p. 201.
92. de Londras, F. and Morgan, D. G. (2013). “Constitutional Amendment in Ireland”. In Contiades, X. (ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London and New York: Routledge, p. 179.
93. de Vreese, C. H. and Boomgaarden, H. G. (2005). “Projecting EU Referendums: Fear of Immigration and Support for European Integration”. European Union Politics, 6(1): 59–82.
94. de Vries, C. E. (2007). “Sleeping Giant: Fact or Fairytale?: How European Integration Affects National Elections”. European Union Politics, 8(3): 363–86.
95. de Vries, C. E. and Edwards, E. (2009). “Taking Europe to Its Extremes: Extremist Parties and Public Euroskepticism”. Party Politics, (15)1: 5–28.
96. de Vries, C. E. and Hobolt, S. B. (2012). “When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs”. European Union Politics, 13(2): 246–68.
97. de Vries, C. E. and Marks, G. (2012). “The Struggle over Dimensionality: A Note on Theory and Empirics”. European Union Politics, 13(2): 185–93.
98. de Wilde, P. and Zürn, M. (2012). “Can the Politicization of European Integration be Reversed?” Journal of Common Market Studies, 50: 137–53.
99. de Witte, B. (2001). “Constitutional Aspects of European Union Membership in the Original Six Member States”. In Kellerman, A. E., de Zwaan, J. W. and Czuczai, J. (eds.), EU Enlargement – The Constitutional Impact at EU and National Level. The Hague: TMC Asser Institute, pp. 165–80.
100. de Witte, B. (2002). “The Closest Thing to a Constitutional Conversation in Europe: The Semi-Permanent Treaty Revision Process”. In Beaumont, P., Lyons, C. and Walker, N. (eds.), Convergence and Divergence in European Public Law. Oxford: Hart.
101. de Witte, B. (2004). “Treaty Revision in the European Union: Constitutional Change Through International Law”. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 35: 51–84.
102. de Witte, B. (2007). “Saving the Constitution? The Escape Routes and Their Legal Feasibility”. In Amato, G., Bribosia, H. and de Witte, B. (eds.), Genèse et destinée de la Constitution européenne/Genesis and Destiny of the European Constitution. Bruxelles: Bruylant, pp. 929–38.
103. de Witte, B. (2012). “Treaty Revision Procedures after Lisbon.” In Biondi, A., Eeckhout, P. and Ripley, S. (eds.), EU Law After Lisbon. Oxford University Press, pp. 107–27.
104. de Witte, B. and Beukers, T. (2013). “The Court of Justice Approves the Creation of the European Stability Mechanism outside the EU Legal Order: Pringle”. Common Market Law Review, 50(3): 805–48.
105. Dehousse, R. (2006). “The Unmaking of a Constitution: Lessons from the European Referenda”. Constellations, 13: 151–64.
106. Dehousse, R. (2007). “Au-delà du plan B: comment réformer les clauses de revisión des traités”. In Amato, G., Bribosia, H. and de Witte, B. (eds.), Genèse et destinée de la Constitution européenne/Genesis and Destiny of the European Constitution. Bruylant, Brussels, 2007, pp. 939–55.
107. Delpérée, F. (2007). “Belgium: The Lock-through System”. In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 67–77.
108. Den Hartog, A. (1994). “The Netherlands and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty”. In Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S. (eds.), The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debates and Future Implications. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, p. 213.
109. Dicey, A. V. (1890). “Ought The Referendum to be Introduced into England?”. Contemporary Review, 57: 489.
110. Dixon, R. (2011). “Constitutional Amendment Rules: A Comparative Perspective”. In Ginsburg, T. and Dixon, R. (eds.), Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 96–111.
111. Dougan, M. (2011). “What Are We to Make of the Citizens’ Initiative?” Common Market Law Review, 48(6): 1807–48.
112. Downs, A. (1957). “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy”. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2): 135–50.
113. Duchacek, I. D. (1970). Comparative Federalism. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
114. Dür, A. and Mateo, G. (2011). “To Call or Not to Call: Political Parties and Referendums on the EU's Constitutional Treaty”. Comparative Political Studies, 44(7): 468–92.
115. Duff, A. (2012). On Governing Europe. London: Policy Network.
116. Efler, M., Hӓfner, G., Huber, R. and Vogel, P. (2009). Europe: Not Without the People! The Dismal State of Democracy in the European Union and How to Mend It. Hamburg: VSA Verlag.
117. Ehlermann, C.-D. and Meny, Y. (2000). Reforming the Treaties’ Amendment Procedure. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute.
118. Emiliou, N. (2001). “The Constitutional Impact of Enlargement at EU and National Level – The Case of the Republic of Cyprus”. In Kellerman, A. E., de Zwaan, J. W. and Czuczai, J. (eds.), EU Enlargement – The Constitutional Impact at EU and National Level. The Hague: TMC Asser Institute, pp. 243–58.
119. Engel, C. (2006). “Germany: A Story of Saving Face”. In F. Laursen (ed.), The Treaty of Nice: Actor Preferences, Bargaining and Institutional Choice. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, p. 83.
120. Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T. and Melton, J. (2009). The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge University Press.
121. European Commission (2002). Feasibility Study: Contribution to a Preliminary Draft Constitution of the European Union.
122. Everling, U. (1994). “The Maastricht Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court and its Significance for the Development of the European Union”. Yearbook of European Law 1.
123. Fabbrini, F. (2013). “The Fiscal Compact, the ‘Golden Rule,’ and the Paradox of European Federalism”. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 36(1): 1–38.
124. Fabbrini, S. (2004). “Transatlantic Constitutionalism: Comparing the United States and the European Union”. European Journal of Political Research, 43(4): 547–69.
125. Fabbrini, S. (2013). “Intergovernmentalism and Its Limits Assessing the European Union's Answer to the Euro Crisis”. Comparative Political Studies, 46: 1003–29.
126. Farrell, D. M. and Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (eds.). (2002). Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London and New York: Routledge.
127. Fatin-Rouge Stéfanini M. (2004). Le contrôle du référendum par la justice constitutionnelle. Economica, Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille.
128. Filippov, M. (2005). “Riker and Federalism”. Constitutional Political Economy, 16(2): 93–111.
129. Filippov, M., Ordeshook, P. C. and Shvetsova, O. (2004). Designing Federalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
130. Finke, D. and König, T. (2009). “Why Risk Popular Ratification Failure? A Comparative Analysis of the Choice of the Ratification Instrument in the 25 Member States of the EU”. Constitutional Political Economy, 20(3–4): 341–65.
131. Fisch, W. B. (2006). “Constitutional Referendum in the United States of America”. American Journal of Comparative Law, 54: 485–504.
132. Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the People Speak. Oxford University Press.
133. Føllesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006). “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3): 533–62.
134. Franklin, M., Marsh, M. and McLaren, L. (1994). “Uncorking the Bottle: Popular Opposition to European Unification in the Wake of Maastricht”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 32(4): 455–72.
135. Franklin, M. (2002). “Learning from the Danish Case: A Comment on Palle Svensson's Critique of the Franklin Thesis”. European Journal of Political Research, 41: 751–7.
136. Frey, B. S. (1996). “A Directly Democratic and Federal Europe.” Constitutional Political Economy, 7(4): 267–79.
137. Fung, A. (2007). “Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructive Engagement”. American Political Science Review, 101(3): 443–58.
138. Gabel, M. (1998). “Public Support for European Integration”. The Journal of Politics, 60(2): 333–54.
139. Gabel, M. and Hix, S. (2002). “Defining the EU Political Space: An Empirical Study of the European Elections Manifestos, 1979–1999”. Comparative Political Studies, 35(8): 934–64.
140. Gallagher, M. (1988). “The Single European Act Referendum”. Irish Political Studies, 3: 77–82.
141. Gallagher, M. and Uleri, P.-V. (1996). The Referendum Experience in Europe. London: Macmillan.
142. Gamble, B. S. (1997). “Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote”. American Journal of Political Science, 41: 245–69.
143. Garry, J., Marsh, M. and Sinnott, R. (2005). “‘Second-order’ versus ‘Issue-voting’ Effects in EU Referendums. Evidence from the Irish Nice Treaty Referendums”. European Union Politics, 6(2): 201–21.
144. Gerkrath, J. (2013). “Constitutional Amendment in Luxembourg”. In X. Contiades (ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London and New York: Routledge, p. 229.
145. Gil Ibañnez, A. (1994). “Spain and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty”. In Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S. (eds.), The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, p. 129.
146. Ginsburg, T. (ed.) (2012). Comparative Constitutional Design. Cambridge University Press.
147. Ginsburg, T. and Dixon, R. (eds.) (2011). Comparative Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
148. Glass, H. E. (1978). “Consensus and Opposition in Switzerland: A Neglected Consideration”. Comparative Politics, 10(3): 361–72.
149. Glencross, A. (2009). What Makes the EU Viable: European Integration in the Light of the Antebellum in US Experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
150. Gordon, M. J. and Dougan, M. (2012). “The United Kingdom's European Union Act 2011: ‘Who Won the Bloody War Anyway?’”. European Law Review, 37(1): 3–30.
151. Goybet, C. (1992). “Le oui àMaastricht… et après?”. Revue du Marché commun et de l’Union européenne, 361: 681.
152. Griller, S. (2001). “Introduction to the Problems in the Austrian, the Finnish, and the Swedish Constitutional Order”. In Kellerman, A. E., de Zwaan, J. W. and Czuczai, J. (eds.), EU Enlargement – The Constitutional Impact at EU and National Level. The Hague: TMC Asser Institute, pp. 147–82.
153. Griller, S., Keiler, S., Kröll, T., Lienbacher, G. and Vranes, E. (2011). National Constitutional Law and European Integration. European Parliament Study (Policy Department C – Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs).
154. Grimm, D. (1995). “Does Europe Need A Constitution?”. European Law Journal, 1: 282.
155. Grimm, D. (2009). “Defending Sovereign Statehood Against Transforming the Union Into a State.” European Constitutional Law Review, 5: 353–73.
156. Guerra Martins, A. M. (2006). “Portugal: the Fight against the Big Ones”. In Laursen, F. (ed.), The Treaty of Nice: Actor Preferences, Bargaining and Institutional Choice. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 247–62.
157. Gunlicks, A. B. (1998). “The Land Constitutions in Germany”. Publius, 28: 105.
158. Habermas, J. (2001). “A Constitution for Europe?”. New Left Review, 11: 5–26.
159. Habermas, J. (2007). “Wacht auf, schlafende Mehrheiten für eine Vertiefung der Europӓischen Union” (23/03/07), www.perlentaucher.de/artikel/3795.html.
160. Habermas, J. (2012). “The Crisis of the European Union in the Light of a Constitutionalization of International Law”. European Journal of International Law, 23(2), 335–48.
161. Hahn, E. J. C. (1995). “The Occupying Powers and the Constitutional Reconstruction of West Germany, 1945–1949”. In D. Junker et al., Cornerstone of Democracy: The West German Grundgesetz, 1949–1989. Washington D.C.: German Historical Institute.
162. Hall, P. A. (2012). “The Mythology of European Monetary Union”. Swiss Political Science Review, 18(4): 508–13.
163. Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. (1996). “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”. Political Studies, 44(5): 936–57.
164. Haller, W. (2009). The Swiss Constitution. Zurich: Dike.
165. Hamon, F. (2006). “La Crise du systeme referendaire”. Droits, 43: 91.
166. Hamon, F. (2010). “The Financing of Referendum Campaigns in France”. In Gilland Lutz, K. and Hug, S. (eds.), Financing Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
167. Hamon, F. and Troper, M. (2009). Droit constitutionnel. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
168. Hare, S. (2012). “The Democratic Legitimacy of Euro-Area Bailouts”. Mediterranean Politics, 17(3): 459–65.
169. Headon, D. and Brownrigg, J. (1998). Special Issue on The People's Conventions: Corowa (1893) and Bathurst (1896). Canberra: Papers on Parliament No. 32, Department of the Senate.
170. Helms, L. (2004). “Five Ways of Institutionalizing Political Opposition: Lessons from the Advanced Democracies”. Government and Opposition, 39(1): 22–54.
171. Henderson, K. (2004). “EU Accession and the New Slovak Consensus”. West European Politics, 27(4): 652–70.
172. Hettne, J. and Bergstrom, C. (2008). “Sweden”. In Koeck, H. F. and Karollus, M. M. (eds.), Preparing the European Union for the Future? Necessary Revisions of Primary Law after the Non-ratification of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe. Vienna: Nomos, pp. 349–55.
173. Heun, W. (2011). The Constitution of Germany: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
174. Hillion, C. (2010). “The Creeping Nationalisation of the EU Enlargement Policy”. Swedish Insitute for European Policy Studies, Report No. 6.
175. Hillion, C. (2011). “EU enlargement”. In Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford University Press.
176. Hix, S. (2008a). “Towards a Partisan Theory of EU – Politics”. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(8): 1254.
177. Hix, S. (2008b) What's Wrong with the European Union and How to Fix It. London: Polity.
178. Hix, S. and Hoyland, B. (2011). The Political System of the European Union. London: Palgrave.
179. Hix, S. and Lord, C. (1997). Political Parties in the European Union. London: Macmillan.
180. Hobolt, S. B. (2006). “Direct Democracy and European Integration”. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1): 153–66.
181. Hobolt, S. B. (2009). Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford University Press.
182. Hoffmeister, F. (2007). “Constitutional Implications of EU Membership: A View from the Commission”. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 3: 59–97.
183. Hogan, G. (2001). “Ireland: The Nice Treaty and the Irish Constitution”. European Public Law, 7(4): 565–73.
184. Hogan, G. (2007). “Ratification of the European Constitution – Implications for Ireland”. In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 137–47.
185. Hogan, G. (2009). “The Lisbon Treaty and the Irish Referendum”. European Public Law, 15: 163.
186. Hogg, P. W. (2006). “Canada: From Privy Council to Supreme Court”. In J. Goldsworthy (ed.), Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–105.
187. Hogg, P. W. (2007). Constitutional Law in Canada. Scarborough, Ont.: Thomson/Carswell.
188. Hooghe, L. (2007). “What Drives Euroskepticism?: Party-Public Cueing, Ideology and Strategic Opportunity”. European Union Politics, 8(1): 5–12.
189. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2005). “Community, Calculation and Cues”. European Union Politics, 6(4): 421–45.
190. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009). “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus”. British Journal of Political Science, 39: 1–23.
191. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Wilson, C. J. (2004). “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?”. In Marks, G. and Steenbergen, M. (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–40.
192. House of Lords. (2006). “The Further Enlargement of the EU: Threat or Opportunity?” (European Union Committee, HL 273).
193. House of Lords. (2012). “European Banking Union: Key Issues and Challenges”. (European Union Committee, HL 88).
194. Hueglin, T. and Fenna, A. (2006). Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
195. Hug, S. (2002). Voices of Europe: Citizens, Referendums, and European Integration. Lanham. Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
196. Hug, S. (2004). “Occurrence and Policy Consequences of Referendums. A Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence”. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 16(3): 321–56.
197. Hug, S. (2009). “Some Thoughts About Referendums, Representative Democracy, and Separation of Powers”. Constitutional Political Economy, 20(3–4): 251–66.
198. Hug, S. and König, T. (2002). “In View of Ratification: Governmental Preferences and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference”. International Organization, 56: 447–76.
199. Hug, S. and Tsebelis, G. (2002). “Veto Players and Referendums around the World.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 14: 465–516.
200. Husa, J. (2011). The Constitution of Finland. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
201. Ivaldi, G. (2006). “Beyond France's 2005 Referendum on the European Constitutional Treaty: Second-Order Model, Anti-Establishment Attitudes and the End of the Alternative European Utopia”. West European Politics, 29(1): 47–69.
202. Johansson, K. M. and Raunio, T. (2001). “Partisan Responses to Europe: Comparing Finnish and Swedish Political Parties”. European Journal of Political Research, 39: 225–49.
203. Kaddous, C. and Auer, A. (eds.) (2006). Les principes fondamentaux de la Constitution européenne. Genève: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
204. Kahana, T. (2011). “Canada”. In Oliver, D. and Fusaro, C. (eds.), How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 9–40.
205. Karlsson, C. and Svensson, A.-C. (2006). “Sweden: In the Shadow of Enlargement?”. In F. Laursen (ed.), The Treaty of Nice: Actor Preferences, Bargaining and Institutional Choice. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 287–306.
206. Kaufmann, B. and Waters, M. D. (2004). Direct Democracy in Europe. A Comprehensive Reference Guide to the Initiative and Referendum Process in Europe. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
207. Kelemen, D. R. (2004). The Rules of Federalism: Institutions and Regulatory Politics in the EU and Beyond, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
208. Kelemen, D. R. (2007). “Built to Last? The Durability of EU Federalism”. In Meunier, S. and McNamara, K. (eds.), The State of the European Union Volume 8: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty. Oxford University Press.
209. Kellerman, A. E. (2008). “The Irish Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty”. Amicus Curiae, 75: 33–6.
210. Kesavan, V. and Paulsen, M. S. (2002). “Is West Virginia Unconstitutional?”. California Law Review, 90: 291.
211. Kingston, S. (2009). “Ireland's Options after the Lisbon Referendum: Strategies, Implications and Competing Visions of Europe”. European Law Review, 34: 455.
212. Kirchheimer, O. (1957). “The Waning of Opposition in Parliamentary Regimes”. Social Research, 24: 127–56.
213. Klabbers, J. (2009). An Introduction to International Institutional Law (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press.
214. Koch, H. (2001). “The Danish Constitutional Order”. In Kellerman, A. E., de Zwaan, J. W. and Czuczai, J. (eds.), EU Enlargement – The Constitutional Impact at EU and National Level. The Hague: TMC Asser Institute, pp. 109–16.
215. Koliopoulos, K. (1994). “Greece and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty”. In Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S. (eds.), The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, p. 113.
216. Kolz, A. (1999). Le origini della costituzione svizzera. Traduzione Italiana. [Origins of the Swiss Constitution] Locarno: Armando Dado.
217. Komarek, J. and Kuhn, Z. (2008). “The Czech Republic”. In H. F. Koeck and M. M. Karollus (eds.), Preparing the European Union for the Future? Necessary Revisions of Primary Law after the Non-ratification of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe. Vienna: Nomos, pp. 53–68.
218. Kommers, D. (1999). “The Basic Law: A Fifty Year Assessment”. In Fifty Years of the German Basic Law: The New Departure for Germany. Washington D.C.: American Institute for Contemporary Germany Studies, Johns Hopkins University.
219. Kommers, D. (2006). “Germany: Balancing Rights and Duties”. In Goldsworthy, J. (ed.), Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, p. 161.
220. Kommers, D. and Miller, R. (2012). The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (3rd edn). Durham and London: Duke University Press.
221. Konstadinides, T. (2012). “‘Drawing the Line between Circumvention and Gap-Filling: An Exploration of the Conceptual Limits of the Treaty's Flexibility Cause’”. Yearbook of European Law, 31(1): 227–62.
222. Kriesi, H. (2005). Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience. Lanham, Md: Lexington Books.
223. Kriesi, H. and Trechsel, A. H. (2008). The Politics of Switzerland: Continuity and Change in a Consensus Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
224. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., and Frey, T. (2006). “Globalization and the Transformation of the National Political Space: Six European Countries Compared”. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6): 921–56.
225. Krunke, H. (2005). “People's Vengeances from Maastricht to Edinburgh: The Danish Solution”. European Constitutional Law Review, 1: 339–56.
226. Krunke, H. (2013). “Formal and Informal Methods of Constitutional Change in Denmark.” In Contiades, X. (ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London and New York: Routledge, p. 73.
227. Kühn, Z. (2007). “Ratification without Debate and Debate without Ratification: The European Constitution in Slovakia and the Czech Republic”. In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 157–69.
228. Kühn, Z. and Bobek, M. (2010). “Europe Yet to Come: The Application of EU Law in Slovakia”. In Lazowski, A. (ed.), The Application of EU Law in the New States – Brave New World. TMC Asser Press, pp. 357–78.
229. La Nauze, J. (1972). The Making of the Australian Constitution. Melbourne University Press.
230. Lacy, D. and Niou, E. M. (2000). “A Problem with Referendums”. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12: 5–32.
231. Laffranque, J. (2007). “Ratification of the European Constitution in Estonia: A New Constitution for Estonia?” In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratification and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 79–88.
232. Laffranque, R. (2009). “Le concept estonien de référendum sur d”autres questions d’intérˆet national’: tentative de définition”. Juridica International, 16: 65–72.
233. Laponce, J. A. (2004). “Turning Votes into Territories: Boundary Referendums in Theory and Practice”. Political Geography, 23(2): 169–83.
234. Lastra, R. M. and Louis, J.-V. (2013). “European Economic and Monetary Union: History, Trends, and Prospects”. Yearbook of European Law, 32: 57–206.
235. Laursen, F. (1994). “Denmark and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty”. In Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S. (eds.), The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
236. Laursen, F. (2006). “Denmark: The Battle to Avoid a Referendum”. In Laursen, F. (ed.), The Treaty of Nice: Actor Preferences. Bargaining and Institutional Choice. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 57.
237. Laursen, F. (2008). “Denmark and the Constitutional Treaty: A Difficult Two-Level Game”. In Laursen, F. (ed.), The Rise and Fall of the EU's Constitutional Treaty. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
238. Lazer, H. (1976). “British Populism: The Labour Party and the Common Market Parliamentary Debate”. Political Science Quarterly, 91(2): 259–77.
239. Lazowski, A. (2011). “Half Full, Half Empty Glass: The Application of EU Law in Poland (2004–2010)”. Common Market Law Review, 48(2): 503–53.
240. LeDuc, L. (2002). “Opinion Change and Voting Behaviour in Referendums”. European Journal of Political Research, 41: 711–32.
241. LeDuc, L. (2003). The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Ontario: Broadview Press.
242. Leibowitz, A. H. (1989). Defining Status: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States Territorial Relations. Norwell, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
243. Lemco, J. (1991). Political Stability in Federal Governments. New York: Praeger.
244. Lenaerts, K. (1988a). Le juge et la constitution aux états-Unis d’Amérique et dans l’ordre juridique européen. Brussels: Bruylant.
245. Lenaerts, K. (1988b). Two Hundred Years of U.S. Constitution and Thirty Years of EEC Treaty. Brussels: Kluwer.
246. Lenaerts, K. and Desomer, M. (2002). “New Models of Constitution-Making in Europe: The Quest for. Legitimacy”. Common Market Law Review, 39: 1217.
247. Lenaerts, K. and Van Nuffel, P. (2011). EU Law (3rd edn). London: Sweet and Maxwell.
248. Leonardy, U. (2011). “Is the European Federation a ‘Mission Impossible’? A Critical Analysis of the German Constitutional Court's Judgment on the Lisbon Treaty”. Regional and Federal Studies, 21(1): 73–90.
249. Leuffen, D., Rittberger, B. and Schimmelfennig, F. (2012). Differentiated Integration. Explaining Variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
250. Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
251. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press.
252. Lindberg, L. and Scheingold, S. A. (1970). Europe's Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
253. Linder, W. (2007). “Direct Democracy”. In Kloti, U. et al. (ed.), Handbook of Swiss Politics. Zurich: Neue Zürcher Zeitung Publishing, pp. 101–20.
254. Linder, W. (2010). Swiss Democracy: Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies (3rd edn). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
255. Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (1967). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
256. Lowi, T. J. (1972). “Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice”. Public Administration Review, 32: 298–310.
257. Lupia, A. and Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). “Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions”. Annual Review of Political Science, 7: 463–82.
258. Lutz, D. (2006). Principles of Constitutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
259. Machado, J. E. M. (2013). “The Portuguese Constitution of 1976: Half-life and Decay”. In Contiades, X. (ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London and New York: Routledge, p. 273.
260. Magleby, D. (1984). Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
261. Mair, P. (2007). “Political Opposition and the European Union”. Government and Opposition, 42(1): 1–17.
262. Mair, P. (2009). “The British Party System: A Comparative Perspective”. In Flinders, M. et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of British Politics. Oxford University Press, pp. 283–301.
263. Majone, G. (2009). “The ‘Referendums Threat’, the Rationally Ignorant Voter, and the Political Culture of the EU”. UCD Working Papers in Law, Criminology and Socio-Legal Studies, No. 04/2009.
264. Malmberg, L.-G. (2013). “Constitutional Amendment in Sweden.” In Contiades, X. (ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London and New York: Routledge, p. 325.
265. Mancini, F. (1998). “Europe: The Case for Statehood”. European Law Journal, 4: 29.
266. March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
267. Marks, G. (2004). “Conclusion: European Integration and Political Conflict”. In Marks, G. and Steenbergen, M. (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–59.
268. Marks, G. and Steenbergen, M. (2004). European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge University Press.
269. Marquis, P. (1993). Referendums in Canada: The Effects of Populist Decision-making on Representative Democracy. Ottowa, Ontario: Library of Parliament, Parliamentary Information and Research Service.
270. Martin Perez de Nanclares, J. (2008). “Spain”. In Koeck, H. F. and Karollus, M. M. (eds.), Preparing the European Union for the Future? Necessary Revisions of Primary Law after the Non-ratification of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe. Vienna: Nomos, pp. 325–47.
271. Marxer, W. and Pállinger, Z. T. (2007). “System Contexts and System Effects of Direct Democracy in Liechtenstein and Switzerland Compared”. In Pállinger, Z. T., Kaufmann, B., Marxer, W. and Schiller, T. (eds.), Direct Democracy in Europe – Experiences, Developments and Prospects. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag f¨ur Sozialwissenschaften.
272. Mateo, G. (2006). “Domestic Politics and Referendums on the Constitutional Treaty”. EUI Working Paper RSCAS No. 2006/32.
273. Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). For the Many or the Few: the Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy. University of Chicago Press.
274. McKay, J. (1996). “Berlin-Brandenburg? Nein danke! The Referendum on the Proposed L¨anderfusion”. German Politics, 5(3): 485.
275. McKay, D. (1999). Federalism and European Union: A Political Economy Perspective. Oxford University Press.
276. McKay, D. (2001). Designing Europe: Comparative Lessons from the Federal Experience. Oxford University Press.
277. McLaren, L. (2002). “Public Support for European Integration: Cost/Benefit Analysis or Perceived Cultural Threat”. Journal of Politics, 64(2): 551–66.
278. Mendez, F. and Mendez, M. (2010). “Referendums and European Integration: beyond the Lisbon Vote”. Public Law (2): 223–30.
279. Mendez, F. and Triga, V. (2009). “Constitution-making, Conflict Resolution and Direct Democracy in the Case of Cyprus: A Comparative Framework”. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 11(4): 363–80.
280. Mendez, F., Mendez, M. and Triga, V. (2009). “Charting the Rise (and Fall?) of Direct Democracy in the European Union: How Comparative Federalism can Help us Understand the Interplay of Direct Democracy and European Integration”. Revista de Ciencia Politica, 29(1): 57–83.
281. Mendez, F. and Wheatley, J. (2013). “Patterns of Constitution-making over Time and Space”. In Wheatley, J. and Mendez, F. (eds.), Patterns of Constitutional Design. The Role of Citizens and Elites in Constitution-Making. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 21–48.
282. Menon, A. and Schain, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism: The European Union and the United States in Comparative Perspective. Oxford, University Press.
283. Miller, K. P. (2009). Direct Democracy and the Courts. Cambridge University Press.
284. Miller, V. (2009). “The Treaty of Lisbon: Government and Parliamentary Views on a Referendum”. House of Commons Note SN/IA/5071.
285. Millward Brown IMS (2008). Post Lisbon Treaty Research Findings. Dublin.
286. Monahan, P. (2006). Constitutional Law. Toronto: Irwin Law.
287. Moravcsik, A. (2008). “The European Constitutional Settlement”. The World Economy, 31(1): 158–83.
288. Morel, L. (2007). “The Rise of ‘Politically Obligatory’ Referendums: The 2005 French Referendum in Comparative Perspective”. West European Politics, 30(5): 1041–67.
289. Morel, L. (2001). “The Strategic Use of Government-Sponsored Referendums in Liberal Democracies”. In Mendelsohn, M. and Parkin, A. (eds.), Referendum Democracy: Citizens, Elites, and Deliberation in Referendums Campaigns. New York: Palgrave, pp. 47–64.
290. Morgan, G., Campbell, J., Crouch, C., Pedersen, O. K. and Whitley, R. (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis. Oxford University Press.
291. Moura Ramos, R. M. (2001). “The Adaptation of the Portuguese Constitutional Order to Community Law”. In Kellerman, A. E., de Zwaan, J. W. and Czuczai, J. (eds.), EU Enlargement – The Constitutional Impact at EU and National Level. The Hague: TMC Asser Institute, pp. 47–64.
292. Murkens, J. E. K. (2012). “The European Union Act 2011: A Failed Statute”. Tijdschrift voor Constitutioneel Recht, 3(4): 396–408.
293. Musgrave, T. (2003). “The Western Australian Secessionist Movement”. Macquarie Law Journal, 3: 95.
294. Neidhart, L. (1970). Plebiszit und pluralit¨are Demokratie. Bern: Francke.
295. Nergelius, J. (2007). “Sweden's Possible Ratification of the EU Constitution”, in Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratifications and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
296. Nijeboer, A. (2005). “The Dutch Referendum”. European Constitutional Law Review, 1(3): 393–405.
297. Nicola¨ıdis, K. (2013). “European Demoicracy and Its Crisis”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2): 351–69.
298. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
299. North, D. C. (1994). “Economic Performance Through Time”. American Economic Review, 84(3): 359–68.
300. Norton, P. (2011). “Divided Loyalties: The European Communities Act 1972.” Parliamentary History, 30(1): 53–64.
301. Novak, P. (2013). “Article 136 TFEU, ESM, Fiscal Stability Treaty Ratification Requirements and Present Situation in the Member States July 2013 NOTE”. European Parliament DG for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs.
302. O’Mahony, J. (2009). “Ireland's EU Referendum Experience”. Irish Political Studies, 24(4): 429–46.
303. Ojanen, T. (2004). “The Impact of EU Membership on Finnish Constitutional Law”, European Public Law, 10: 531.
304. Ojanen, T. (2007). “The European Constitution in the Far North, in a Country called Suomi”. In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratifications and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 89.
305. Ojanen, T. (2013). “Constitutional Amendment in Finland”. In Contiades, X. (ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London and New York: Routledge, p. 93.
306. Oliver, D. and Fusaro, C. (2011). How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
307. Oppermann, K. (2013). “The Politics of Avoiding Referendums on the Treaty of Lisbon”. Journal of European Integration, 35: 73–89.
308. Pal Singh, M. (2011). “India”. In Oliver, D. and Fusaro, C. (eds.), How Constitutions Change: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Hart Publishing, p. 169.
309. Papadopoulos, Y. (2005). “Implementing (and Radicalizing) Art. I-47.4 of the Constitution: Is the Addition of Some (Semi-) Direct Democracy to the Nascent Consociational European Federation just Swiss Folklore?”. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(3): 448–67.
310. Papadopoulos, Y. and Magnette, P. (2010). “On the Politicisation of the European Union: Lessons from Consociational National Polities”. West European Politics, 3(4): 711–29.
311. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press.
312. Pech, L. and Griffin, P. B. (2009). “Fixing a Hole Where the Rain Gets in: The Lisbon Treaty and the Irish ‘Legal Guarantees’”. Irish Journal of European Law, 16(1 & 2): 5–36.
313. Peers, S. (2011). EU Justice and Home Affairs. Oxford University Press.
314. Peers, S. (2012a). “The Future of EU Treaty Amendments”. Yearbook of European Law, 31(1): 17–111.
315. Peers, S. (2012b). “The Stability Treaty: Permanent Austerity or Gesture Politics?” European Constitutional Law Review, 8(3): 404–41.
316. Peers, S. (2013). “Towards a New Form of EU Law?: The Use of EU Institutions outside the EU Legal Framework”. European Constitutional Law Review, 9(1): 37–72.
317. Perez Tremps, P. and Saiz Arnaiz, A. (2007). “Spain's Ratification of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe”. In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratifications and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 4.
318. Pernice, I. (2006). “Réferendum sur la Constitution pour l’Europe: conditions, risques et implications”. In Kaddous, C. and Auer, A. (eds.), Les principes fondamentaux de la Constitution européenne. Genève: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, pp. 301–15.
319. Pernice, I. (2011). “Motor or Brake for European Policies? Germany's New Role in the EU after the Lisbon Judgment of its Federal Constitutional Court”. Walter Hallstein-Institut Paper 03/11.
320. Personen, P. and Sӓnkiaho, R. (1994). “The Finnish Referendum on Membership in the EU”. Yearbook of Finnish Foreign Policy, 52.
321. Pesonen, P., Jenssen, A. T. and Gilljam, M. (1988). ‘To Join or Not to Join’: Three Nordic Referendums on Membership in the European Union. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
322. Peters, A. (2005). “Referendums on the Constitutional Treaty 2004: A Citizens’ Voice?”. In Curtin, D., Kellermann, A. E. and Blockmans, S. (eds.), The EU Constitution: The Best Way Forward? The Hague: TMC Asser Press, pp. 39–57.
323. Piris, J. C. (2012). The Future of Europe. Towards a Two-speed EU? Cambridge University Press.
324. Putnam, R. D. (1988). “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games”. International Organization, 42(3): 427–60.
325. Quermonne, J.-L. (2010). “Les référendums européens sont-ils légitimes?”. In Masclet, J.-C. et al. (eds.), L’Union européene: union de droit, union des droits. Mélanges en L’honneur de professeur Phillipe Manin. Paris: Perdone, pp. 197–202.
326. Qvortrup, M. (1999). “A. V. Dicey: The Referendum as the People's Veto”. History of Political Thought, 20(3): 531–46.
327. Qvortrup, M. (2000). “Are Referendums Controlled and Pro-hegemonic?”. Political Studies, 48(4): 821–6.
328. Qvortrup, M. (2005). A Comparative Study of Referendums: Government by the People (2nd edn). Manchester University Press.
329. Qvortrup, M. (2006). “The Three Referendums on the European Constitution Treaty in 2005”. The Political Quarterly, 77(1): 89–97.
330. Qvortrup, M. (2009). “Rebels without a Cause? The Irish Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty”. The Political Quarterly, 80(1): 59–66.
331. Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. University of Chicago Press.
332. Ragin, C., Berg-Schlosser, D. and de Meur, G. (1996). “Political Methodology: Qualitative Methods”. In Goodin, R. E. and Klingenmann, V. (eds.), A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford University Press, pp. 749–68.
333. Rakove, J. N. (1996). Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage.
334. Ratnapala, S. (2006). Australian Constitutional Law: Foundations and Theory (2nd edn). Oxford University Press.
335. Ray, L. (2003). “When Parties Matter: The Conditional Influence of Party Positions on Voter Opinion about European Integration”. Journal of Politics, 65(4): 978–94.
336. Reif, K.-H. and Schmitt, H. (1980). “Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results”. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1): 3–44.
337. Riker, W. H. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown.
338. Rodin, S. and Capeta, T. (2007). “A View from a Candidate Country: Implications for Croatia of (Non-) Ratification of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe”. In Albi, A. and Ziller, J. (eds.), The European Constitution and National Constitutions: Ratifications and Beyond. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 189–201.
339. Rose, R. (2000). “The End of Consensus in Austria and Switzerland”. Journal of Democracy, 2(2): 26–40.
340. Rose, R. (2013). Representing Europeans: A Pragmatic Approach. Oxford University Press.
341. Rose, R. and Borz, G. (2013). “What Determines Demand for European Union Referendums?” Journal of European Integration, 35(5): 619–33.
342. Ruffer, E. (2010). “The Quest of the Lisbon Treaty in the Czech Republic and Some of the Changes it Introduces in EU Primary Law”. Czech Yearbook of International Law, 1: 23–64.
343. Ruffert, M. (2011). “The European Debt Crisis and European Union Law”. Common Market Law Review, 48(6): 1777–805.
344. Ruin, O. (1996). “Sweden: The Referendum as an Instrument for Defusing Political Issues”. In Gallagher, M. and Uleri, P.-V. (eds.), The Referendum Experience in Europe. New York: Saint Martin's Press, pp. 171–84.
345. Russell, P. H. (2004). Constitutional Odyssey: Can Canadians Become A Sovereign People? Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.
346. Sandalow, T. and Stein, E. (1982). Courts and Free Markets. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
347. Saunders, C. (2011). The Constitution of Australia: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
348. Scarrow, S. E. (2001). “Direct Democracy and Institutional Change: A Comparative Investigation”. Comparative Political Studies, 34: 651–65.
349. Schaller, T. F. (1998). “Democracy at Rest: Strategic Ratification of the Twenty-First Amendment”. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 28(2): 81.
350. Scharpf, F. W. (1988). “The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration”. Public Administration, 66(3): 239–78.
351. Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford University Press.
352. Schmitter, P. C. (2000). How to Democratize the European Union – and Why Bother? Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
353. Schmitter, P. C. (2005). “E-Voting, E-Democracy and EU-democracy: A Thought Experiment”. In Trechsel, A. and Mendez, F. (eds.), The European Union and E-Voting. Addressing the European Parliament's Internet Voting Challenge. London: Routledge, pp. 187–201.
354. Schneider, G. and Cederman, L.-E. (1994). “The Change of Tide in Political Cooperation: A Limited Information Model of European Integration”. International Organization, 48: 633–62.
355. Schütze, R. (2009). From Dual To Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure Of European Law. Oxford University Press.
356. Schütze, R. (2012). European Constitutional Law. Cambridge University Press.
357. Serricchio, F., Tsakatika, M. and Quaglia, L. (2013). “Euroscepticism and the Global Financial Crisis”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1): 51–64.
358. Setӓlӓ, M. (1999). “Referendums in Western Europe – A Wave of Direct Democracy?”, Scandinavian Political Studies, 45: 699–721.
359. Setӓlӓ, M. (2006). “On the Problems of Responsibility and Accountability in Referendums”. European Journal of Political Research, 45: 699–721.
360. Shaw, J. (2005). “Europe's Constitutional Future”. Public Law, 132.
361. Shu, M. (2008). “Referendums and the Political Constitutionalisation of the EU”. European Law Journal, 14: 423–45.
362. Sinnott, R. and Elkink, J. (2010). “Attitudes and Behaviour in the Second Referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon 2009”. Dublin: UCD Geary Institute, University College Dublin, IE.
363. Siune, K., Svensson, P. and Tonsgaard, O. (1994). “The European Union: The Danes Said ‘No’ in 1992 but ‘Yes’ in 1993 – How and Why?”. Electoral Studies, 13(2): 107–16.
364. Smith, G. (1976). “The Functional Properties of the Referendum”. European Journal of Political Research, 4: 31–45.
365. Spyropoulos, P. C. and Fortsakis, T. P. (2009). Constitutional Law in Greece. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
366. Steenbergen, M. R., Edwards, E. E. and de Vries, C. (2007). “Who's Cueing Whom? Mass-elite Linkages and the Future of European integration”. European Union Politics, 8(1): 13–35.
367. Stein, E. (2000). Thoughts from a Bridge: A Retrospective of Writings on New Europe and American Federalism. University of Michigan Press.
368. Steinberg, J. (1996). Why Switzerland? (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press.
369. Stelzer, M. (2011). The Constitution of the Republic of Austria: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
370. Stelzer, M. (2013). “Constitutional Change in Austria”. In Contiades, X. (ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. London and New York: Routledge, p. 7.
371. Strauss, D. A. (2010). The Living Constitution. Oxford University Press.
372. Suksi, M. (1996). “Finland: The Referendum as a Dormant Feature”. In Gallagher, M. and Uleri, P.-V. (eds.), The Referendum Experience in Europe. New York: Saint Martin's Press, pp. 52–65.
373. Svensson, P. (1984). “Class, Party and Ideology: A Danish Case Study of Electoral Behaviour in Referendums”. Scandinavian Political Studies, 7: 175–96.
374. Svensson, P. (1994). “The Danish Yes to Maastricht and Edinburgh: The EC Referendum of May 1993”. Scandinavian Political Studies, 17(1): 69–82.
375. Svensson, P. (2002). “Five Danish Referendums on the European Community and Union: A Critical Assessment of the Franklin Thesis”. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6): 733–50.
376. Svensson, P. (2007). “Voting Behaviour in the European Constitution Process”. In Pallinger, T., Kaufmann, B., Marxer, W. and Schiller, T. (eds.), Direct Democracy in Europe: Developments and Prospects. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 163–73.
377. Szczerbiak, A. and Taggart, P. (2004). “The Politics of European Referendum Outcomes and Turnout: Two Models”. West European Politics, 27(4): 557–83.
378. Szczerbiak, A. and Taggart, P. (2005). EU Enlargement and Referendums. London: Routledge.
379. Taggart, P. (2006). “Questions of Europe – The Domestic Politics of the 2005 French and Dutch Referendums and their Challenge for the Study of European Integration”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(1), 7–25.
380. Taggart, P. and Szczerbiak, A. (2013). “Coming in from the Cold? Euroscepticism, Government Participation and Party Positions on Europe”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1): 17–37.
381. Tardi, G. (2003). “Litigation in Canadian Referendum Politics”. Canadian Public Administration, 46: 339–63.
382. Thorlakson, L. (2005), “Federalism and the European Party System”. Journal of European Public Policy, 12: 468–87.
383. Thym, D. (2009). “In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court”. Common Market Law Review, 46: 1795–822.
384. Tierney, S. (2004). Constitutional Law and National Pluralism. Oxford University Press.
385. Tierney, S. (2012). Constitutional Referendums: The Theory and Practice of Republican Deliberation. Oxford University Press.
386. Torreblanca, J. I. (2005). “Spain's Referendum on the European Constitution: A Double Disappointment”. Europe – ARI No. 27/2005.
387. Trechsel, A. H. (2005). “How to Federalize the European Union… And Why Bother”. Journal of European Public Policy, 12: 401–18.
388. Trechsel, A. H. and Glencross, A. (2011). “First or Second Order Referendums? Understanding the Votes on the EU Constitutional Treaty in Four EU Member States”. West European Politics, 34(4): 121–45.
389. Trechsel, A. H., and Mair, P. (2011). “When Parties (Also) Position Themselves: An Introduction to the EU Profiler”. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 8(1): 1–20.
390. Tribe, L. (2000). American Constitutional Law (3rd edn), Vol 1. New York: Foundation Press.
391. Tridimas, G. (2007). “Ratification Through Referendum or Parliamentary Vote: When to Call a Non-required Referendum?”. European Journal of Political Economy, 23: 674–92.
392. Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. (2000). “Legislative Politics in the European Union”. European Union Politics 1(1): 9–36.
393. Tushnet, M. (2009). The Constitution of the United States of America: A Contextual Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
394. Twomey, A. (2007). “A Constitution for a New State – Dilemmas for the Northern Territory”. Public Law Review, 18: 200.
395. Ucen, P. (2004). “Slovakia”. European Journal of Political Research, 43: 1121–9.
396. Usherwood, S. and Startin, N. (2013). “Euroscepticism as a Persistent Phenomenon”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1), 1–16.
397. van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M. (2004). “Potential for Contestation on European Matters at National Elections in Europe”. In Marks, G. and Steenbergen, M. (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–50.
398. van Elsuwege, P. (2008). From Soviet Republics to EU Member States: A Legal and Political Assessment of the Baltic States’ Accession to the EU. Leiden: Brill.
399. Vanhoonacker, S. (1994).“Belgium and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty”. In Laursen, F. and Vanhoonacker, S. (eds.), The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty: Issues, Debates and Future Implications. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, p. 47.
400. Vasilopoulou, S. (2013). “Continuity and Change in the Study of Euroscepticism: Plus c¸a change?”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(1): 153–68.
401. Vatter, A. and Bernauer, J. (2009). “The Missing Dimension of Democracy”. European Union Politics, 10(3): 335–59.
402. von Beyme, K. (1987). America As a Model: The Impact of American Democracy in the World. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
403. Walker, M. C. (2003). The Strategic Use of Referendums: Power, Legitimacy, and Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
404. Weatherill, S. R. (2011). “The Limits of Legislative Harmonisation Ten Years after Tobacco Advertising: How the Court's Case Law has become a ‘Drafting Guide’”. German Law Journal, 12(3): 827–64.
405. Weiler, J. (1995). “Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision”. European Law Journal, 1: 219.
406. Weiler, J. (1997). “To Be a European Citizen: Eros and Civilization”. Journal of European Public Policy, 4: 495–519.
407. Weiler, J. (1999). The Constitution of Europe. Cambridge University Press.
408. Weiss, F. (1985). “Greenland's Withdrawal from the European Communities”. European Law Review, 10(3): 173–85.
409. Wendel, M. (2011). “Lisbon Before the Courts: Comparative Perspectives”. European Constitutional Law Review, 7: 96.
410. Wendel, M. (2013). “Judicial Restraint and the Return to Openness: The Decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court on the ESM and the Fiscal Treaty of 12 September 2012”. German Law Journal, 14: 21–52.
411. Wheare, K. (1963). Federal Government (4th edn). Oxford University Press.
412. Wheatley, J. and Mendez, F. (eds.) (2013). Patterns of Constitutional Design. Farnham: Ashgate.
413. Wildhaber, L. (1995). “Territorial Modifications and Breakups in Federal States”. Canadian Yearbook International Law, 33: 41.
414. Williams, G. and Chin, G. (2000). “The Failure of Citizens’ Initiated Referenda Proposals in Australia: New Directions for Popular Participation?” Australian Journal of Political Science, 35(1): 27–48.
415. Williams, G. and Hume, D. (2010). People Power: The History and Future of the Referendum in Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press.
416. Windfeldt, A. (2004). “Sweden”. European Journal of Political Research, 43: 1144–50.
417. Worre, T. (1998). “Denmark at the Crossroads: The Danish Referendum of 28 February 1986 on the EC Reform Package”. Journal of Common Market Studies, 26(4): 361–88.
418. Wyller, T. C. (1996). “Norway: Six Exceptions to the Rule”. In Gallagher, M. and Uleri, P. V. (eds.), The Referendum Experience in Europe. London: Macmillan, pp. 139–52.
419. Young, R. (1998). The Secession of Quebec and the Future of Canada. McGill: Queen's University Press.
420. Zemánek, J. (2005). “Consent of Parliament or People's Referendum?”. In Pernice, I. and Zemánek, J. (eds.), A Constitution for Europe: The IGC, the Ratification Process and Beyond. Baden Baden: Nomos.