Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration

Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-304

  Hobolt, Sara Binzer ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Campaign; Democracy; Direct democracy; European integration; European union; Information; Political parties; Public opinion; Referendum; Voting behaviour

Indexed keywords

EID: 66049139426     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549948.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (273)

1. Aardal, Bernt (1995). Ideologi på tvers?, in A.T. Jenssen and H. Valen (eds.) Brussels midt imot. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal, 165-84.
2. Aardal, Bernt and Henry Valen (1997). The Storting Elections of 1989 and 1993: Norwegian Politics in Perspective, in K. Strøm and L. Svåsand (eds.) Challenge to Political Parties: The Case of Norway. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 61-76.
3. Aardal, Bernt Anders Todal Jenssen, Henrik Oscarsson, Risto Sänkiaho, and Erika Säynässalo (1998). Can Ideology Explain the EU Vote?, in A.T. Jenssen, P. Pesonen and M. Gilljam (eds.) To Join or Not to Join. Oslo, Scandinavian University Press, 235-65.
4. Aarts, Kees and Henk van der Kolk (2006). Understanding the Dutch 'No': The Euro, the East and the Elite. PS: Political Science & Politics 39(2): 243-6.
5. Abramowitz, Alan I. (1988). An Improved Model for Predicting Presidential Election Outcomes. PS: Political Science and Politics 21(4): 843-7.
6. Abromeit, Heidrun (1998). Democracy in Europe: Legitimising Politics in a Non-state Polity. New York: Berghahn.
7. Aldrich, John H. (1993). Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 246-78.
8. Alvarez, Michael R. (1997). Information and Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
9. Alvarez, Michael R. and John Brehm (2002). Hard Choices, Easy Answers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Ansolabehere, Stephen and Shanto Iyengar (1996). Going Native: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
11. Arrow, Kenneth (1974). The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton.
12. Auer, Andreas (1997). Le référendum européen: définitions, repères historiques et jalons d'études, in A. Auer and J.-F. Flauss (eds.) Le référendum européen. Brussels: Bruylant, 23-47.
13. Auer, Andreas (2005). Adoption, Ratification and Entry Into Force. European Constitutional Law Review 1: 131-5.
14. Aylott, Nicholas (2002). Let's Discuss This Later. Party Reponses to Euro-Division in Scandinavia. Party Politics 8(4): 441-61.
15. Banks, Jeffrey S. (1990). Monopoly Agenda Control and Asymmetric Information. Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(2): 445-64.
16. Banks, Jeffery S. (1993). Two-Sided Uncertainty in the Monopoly Agenda Setter Model. Journal of Public Economics 50(3): 429-44.
17. Bartels, Larry M. (1986). Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test. American Journal of Political Science 30(4): 709-28.
18. Bartels, Larry M. (1988). Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Bartels, Larry M. (1996). Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 194-230.
20. Becker, Theodore L. and Richard A. Couto (1996). Teaching Democracy by Being Democratic. Abingdon: Greenwood Publishing Group.
21. Berelson, Bernard, Paul F. Lazarfeld, and William N. McPhee (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22. Berinsky, Adam and Jeffrey Lewis (2007). An Estimate of Risk Aversion in the U.S. Electorate. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2(2): 139-54.
23. Bonde, Jens-Peter (1986). En vejledende folkeafstemning. Insert in Notat 393, May 1986.
24. Bowler, Shaun and Todd Donovan (1998). Demanding Choices. Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
25. Brady, Henry E. and Paul M. Sniderman (1985). Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning. American Political Science Review 79(4): 1061-78.
26. Brouard, Sylvain and Vincent Tiberj (2006). The French Referendum: The Not So Simple Act of Saying Nay. PS: Political Science & Politics 39(2): 261-8.
27. Buch, Roger and Kasper M. Hansen (2002). The Danes and Europe: From EC 1972 to Euro 2000 - Elections, Referendums and Attitudes. Scandinavian Political Studies 25(1): 1-26.
28. Butler, David and Austin Ranney (eds.) (1978). Referendums. A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington, DC: AEI studies.
29. Butler, David and Austin Ranney (eds.) (1994). Referendums Around the World. The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. Washington, DC: The AEI Press.
30. Butler, David and Donald Stokes (1969). Political Change in Britain (1st edition). London, Macmillan.
31. Butler, David and Donald Stokes (1974). Political Change in Britain (2nd edition). London: Macmillan.
32. Bützer, Michael and Lionel Marquis (2002). Public opinion formation in Swiss federal referendums, in D.M. Farrell and R. Schmitt-Beck (eds.) Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge, 163-82.
33. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes (1960). The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
34. Carmines, Edward G. and James A. Stimson (1986). On the Structure and Sequence of Issue Evolution. American Political Science Review 80(3): 901-20.
35. Carmines, Edward G. and James A. Stimson (1989). Issue Evolution. Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36. Christin, Thomas, Simon Hug, and Pascal Sciarini (2002). Interests and Information in Referendum Voting: An Analysis of Swiss Voters. European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 759-76.
37. Chong, Dennis and James N. Druckman (2007a). Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103-26.
38. Chong, Dennis and James N. Druckman (2007b). Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. American Political Science Review 101(4): 637-55.
39. Clarke, Harold D., David Sanders, Marianne C. Stewart, and Paul Whiteley (2004). Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Clarke, Harold D., David Sanders, Marianne C. Stewart, and Paul Whiteley (2005). Government Performance and Referendum Voting: Experiments with the Euro. Unpublished Manuscript.
41. Converse, Philip E. (1964). The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics, in D. Apter (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.
42. Converse, Philip E. (1975). Public Opinion And Voting Behavior, in F. Greenstein and N. Polsby (eds.) Handbook of Political Science (Vol. 4). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43. Converse, Philip E. (2000). Assessing the Capacity of Mass Electorates. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 331-53.
44. Cox, Gary and Michael Munger (1989). Closeness, Expenditures and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House Elections. American Political Science Review 83(1): 217-31.
45. Crewe, Ivor, Bo Sarlvik, and James Alt (1977). Partisan Dealignment in Britain, 1964-74. British Journal of Political Science 7(1): 129-90.
46. Cronin, Thomas E. (1989). Direct Democracy: The Politics Of Initiative, Referendum, And Recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Davis, Otto A., Melvin J. Hinich, and Peter Ordeshook (1970). An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process. American Political Science Review 64(2): 426-48.
48. Dee, Thomas S. (2003). Are There Civic Returns to Education?. NBER Working Papers 9588, National Bureau of Economic Research.
49. Delli Carpini, Michael and Scott Keeper (1991). Stability and Change in the United States Public's Knowledge of Politics. Public Opinion Quarterly 55(4): 583-612.
50. Delli Carpini, Michael and Scott Keeper (1996). What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
51. de Gaulle, Charles (1970). Discours et messages, Vol. 2: Dans l'attente. Février 1946-Avril 1958. Paris: Plon.
52. de Vreese, Claes H. (2004). Primed by the Euro: The Impact of a Referendum Campaign on Public Opinion and Evaluations of Government and Political Leaders. Scandinavian Political Studies 27(1): 45-65.
53. de Vreese, Claes H. (ed.) (2007). Dynamics of Referendums Campaigns. An International Perspective.Basingstoke: Palgrave.
54. de Vreese, Claes H. and Hajo G. Boomgaarden (2003). Valenced News Frames and Public Support for the EU: Linking Content Analysis and Experimental Data. Communications 3(4): 361-81.
55. de Vreese, Claes H. and Holli A. Semetko (2002). Public Perception of Polls and Support for Restrictions on the Publication of Polls: Denmark's 2000 Euro Referendum. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14(4): 367-90.
56. de Vreese, Claes H. (2004). Political Campaigning in Referendums: Framing the Referendum Issue. London: Routledge.
57. de Vries, Catherine (2007). Sleeping Giant: Fact or Fairytale?: How European Integration Affects National Elections. European Union Politics 8(3): 363-85.
58. DeVellis, Robert F. (1991). Scale Development. Theory and Applications. London: Sage Publications.
59. Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
60. Druckman, James N. (2001a). The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence. Political Behavior 22(3): 225-55.
61. Druckman, James N. (2001b). On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? The Journal of Politics 63(4): 1041-66.
62. Druckman, James N. and Kjersten R. Nelson (2003). Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science 47(4): 729-45.
63. Enelow, James and Melvin J. Hinich (1981). A New Approach to Voter Uncertainty in the Downsian Spatial Model. American Journal of Political Science 25(3): 483-93.
64. Enelow, James and Melvin J. Hinich (1984). The Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Epiney, Astrid (1997). Le référendum européen, in A. Auer and J.-F. Flauss (eds.) Le référendum européen. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 287-315.
66. Esposito, Frédéric (2002). The European Referendum: A Tool to Legitimate the European Integration Process?, in S.S. Nagel (ed.) Policymaking and Democracy: A Multinational Anthology. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 15-38.
67. European Commission (2005). The Commission's Contribution to the Period of Reflection and Beyond: Plan-D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate. COM(2005) 494.
68. European Convention (2003a). Referendum on the European Constitution. Contribution Submitted by Several Members, Alternate Members and Observers of the European Convention. CONV 658/03, Brussels 31 March 2003.
69. European Convention (2003b) How to Bring the Constitution into Force. Contribution submitted by Andrew Duff, member of the Convention. CONV 764/03, Brussels 28 May 2003.
70. Evans, Geoffrey (1998). Euroscepticism and Conservative Electoral Support: How an Asset Became a Liability. British Journal of Political Science 28(4): 573-90.
71. Evans, Geoffrey (1999). Europe: A New Electoral Cleavage?, in G. Evans and P. Norris (eds.) Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-Term Perspective. London: Sage, 207-22.
72. Evans, Geoffrey (2000). The Continued Significance of Class Voting. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 401-17
73. Evans, Geoffrey (2002). European Integration, Party Politics and Voting in the 2001 Election. British Elections and Parties Review 12: 95-110
74. Farrell, David M. and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck (eds.) (2002). Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge.
75. Feld, Lars P. and Gerhard Kirschgässner (2003). The Role of Direct Democracy in the European Union. CESifo Working Paper No. 1083.
76. Ferejohn, John A. and James H. Kuklinski (eds.) (1990). Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
77. Financial Times Europe (2005). From Sunday's Non to Economic Reform, 31 May 2005.
78. Folketinget (1992). Danmark i Europa [Det nationale kompromis], 27 October 1992, Copenhagen.
79. Føllesdal, Andreas and Simon Hix (2006). Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533-62.
80. Franklin, Charles H. (1991). Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of US Senate Incumbents. American Political Science Review 85(4): 1193-214.
81. Franklin, Mark (2001). How Structural Factors Cause Turnout Variations at European Parliament Elections. European Union Politics 2(3): 309-28.
82. Franklin, Mark (2002). Learning from the Danish Case: A Comment on Palle Svensson's Critique of the Franklin Thesis. European Journal of Political Research 41: 751-7.
83. Franklin, Mark (2004). Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Franklin, Mark Cees van der Eijk, and Michael Marsh (1995). Referendum Outcomes and Trust in Government: Public Support for Europe in the Wake of Maastricht. West European Politics 18(3): 101-17.
85. Franklin, Mark Michael Marsh, and Lauren McLaren (1994). Uncorking the Bottle: Popular Opposition to European Unification in the Wake of Maastricht. Journal of Common Market Studies 32(4): 455-72.
86. Franklin, Mark Michael Marsh, and Christopher Wlezien (1994). Attitudes toward Europe and Referendum Votes: A Response to Siune and Svensson. Electoral Studies 13(2): 117-21.
87. Franklin, Mark Michael Marsh, (1997). The Responsive Public: Issue Salience, Policy Changes, and Preferences for European Unification. Journal of Theoretical Politics 9: 347-63.
88. Frey, Bruno S. (1995). A Directly Democratic and Federal Europe. Constitutional Political Economy 7(4): 267-79.
89. Furedi, Frank (2005). To Say or Imply that the Public is Too Stupid to Grasp the High-Minded and Sophisticated Ideals of the Advocates of the EU is to Express a Profound Sense of Contempt Towards Ordinary People. New Statesman, 13 June 2005.
90. Gabel, Matthew J. (1998a). Interest and Integration. Market Liberalization, Public Opinion and European Union. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
91. Gabel, Matthew J. (1998b). Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories. The Journal of Politics 60(2): 333-54.
92. Gaines, Brian J., James H. Kusklinski, and Paul J. Quirk (2007). The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined. Political Analysis 15(1): 1-20.
93. Gallagher, Michaek and Pier Vincenzo Uleri (eds.) (1996). The Referendum Experience in Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
94. Gamson, William A. and Andre Modigliani (1987). The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action, in R.D. Braungart (ed.) Research in Political Sociology, Vol. 3. Greenwich: JAI, 133-77.
95. Garry, John, Michael Marsh, and Richard Sinnott (2005). 'Second Order' Versus 'Issue Voting' Effects in EU Referendums: Evidence from the Irish Nice Treaty Referendums. European Union Politics 6(2): 201-21.
96. Gelman, Andrew and Gary King (1993). Why Are American Presidential Election Polls so Variable When Voters Are so Predictable? British Journal of Political Science 23(4): 49-51.
97. Gerber, Alan and Donald Green (2000). The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 94(3): 653-63.
98. Gerstlé, Jacques (2006). The Impact of Television on French Referendum Campaign in 2005. Notre Europe Studies and Research No 53.
99. Gilland, Karin (2002). Ireland's (First) Referendum on the Treaty of Nice. Journal of Common Market Studies 40(3): 527-35.
100. Habermas, Jürgen (2006). Why Europe Needs a Constitution, in R. Rogowski and C. Turner (eds.) The Shape of the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101. Haider-Markel, Donald P. and Mark R. Joslyn (2001). Gun policy, opinion, tragedy and blame attribution: the conditional influence of issue frames. The Journal of Politics 63(2): 520-43.
102. Hainsworth, Paul (2006). France Says No: The 29 May 2005 Referendum on the European Constitution. Parliamentary Affairs 59(1): 98-117.
103. Harmsen, Robert (2005). The Dutch Referendum on the Ratification of the European Constitutional Treaty. EPERN Referendum Briefing Paper No 13.
104. Hayward, Katy (2003). 'If at First You Don't Succeed ... ': the Second Referendum on the Treaty of Nice, 2002. Irish Political Studies 18(1): 120-32.
105. Hillygus, D. Sunshine (2005). Campaign Effects and the Dynamics of Turnout Intention in Election 2000. The Journal of Politics 67(1): 50-68.
106. Hix, Simonx (1999). Dimension and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses. European Journal of Political Research 35(1): 69-125.
107. Hix, Simonx (2005). The Political System of the European Union, 2nd edition. London: Palgrave.
108. Hobolt, Sara B. (2005). When Europe Matters: The Impact of Political Information on Voting Behaviour in EU Referendums. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 15(1): 85-109.
109. Hobolt, Sara B. (2006). How Parties Affect Vote Choice in European Integration Referendums. Party Politics 12(5): 623-47.
110. Hobolt, Sara B. (2007a). Taking Cues on Europe? Voter Competence and Party Endorsements in Referendums on European Integration. European Journal of Political Research 46(2): 151-82.
111. Hobolt, Sara B. (2007b). Campaign Information and Voting Behaviour in C.H. de Vreese (ed.)Dynamics of Referendum Campaigns. An International Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
112. Hobolt, Sara B. Jae-Jae Spoon, and James Tilley (2009). A Vote Against Europe? Explaining Defection at the 1999 and 2004 European Parliament Elections. British Journal of Political Science 39(1):93-115.
113. Hooghe, Liesbet (2003). Europe Divided? Elites vs. Public Opinion on European Integration. European Union Politics 4(3): 281-304.
114. Hooghe, Liesbet and Gary Marks (2004). Does Identity or Economic Rationality Drive Public Opinion on European Integration? PS: Political Science and Politics 37(3): 415-20.
115. Hooghe, Liesbet and Gary Marks and Carole J. Wilson (2002). Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?, Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 965-89.
116. Hug, Simon (1997). Integration through Referendums. Aussenwirtschaft 52(1-2): 287-310.
117. Hug, Simon (2002). Voices of Europe: Citizens, Referendums and European Integration. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
118. Hug, Simon and Thomas König (2002). In View of Ratification. Governmental Preferences, and Domestic Constraints at the Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference. International Organization 56(2): 447-76.
119. Hug, Simon and Pascal Sciarini (2000). Referendums on European Integration. Do Institutions Matter in the Voter's Decision? Comparative Political Studies 33(1): 3-36.
120. Inglehart, Ronald (1970a). Cognitive Mobilization and European Identity. Comparative Politics 3(1): 45-70.
121. Inglehart, Ronald (1970b). Public Opinion and Regional Integration. International Organization 24(4): 764-95.
122. Inglehart, Ronald (1971). The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies. American Political Science Review 65(4): 991-1017.
123. Industrial Societies (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
124. Industrial Societies (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
125. Irwin, Galen (1995). Second-Order or Third-Rate: Issues in the Campaign for the Elections for the European Parliament 1994. Electoral Studies 14(2): 183-98.
126. Iyengar, Shanto (1987). Television News and Citizens' Explanations of National Affairs. American Political Science Review 81(3): 815-32.
127. Iyengar, Shanto and Donald R. Kinder (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
128. Iyengar, Shanto and Adam F. Simon (2000). New Perspectives and Evidence on Political Communication and Campaign Effects. Annual Review of Political Psychology 51: 149-69.
129. Iyengar, Shanto Donald R. Kinder, Jon Krosnick, and Mark D. Peters (1984). The Evening News and Presidential Evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(4): 778-87.
130. Ivaldi, Gilles (2006). Beyond France's 2005 Referendum on the European Constitutional Treaty: Second-Order Model, Anti-Establishment Attitudes and the End of the Alternative European Utopia. West European Politics 29(1): 47-69.
131. Jaccard, James (2001). Interaction Effects in Logistic Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
132. Jacoby, William G. (2000). Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending. American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 750-67.
133. Kahn, Kim Fridkin (1995). Characteristics of Press Coverage in Senate and Gubernatorial Campaigns: Information Available to Voters. Legislative Studies Quarterly 20(1): 23-36.
134. Kahn, Kim Fridkin and Patrick J. Kenney (1997). A Model of Candidate Evaluations in Senate Elections: The Impact of Campaign Intensity. The Journal of Politics 59(4): 1173-205.
135. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk. Econometrica 47, 263-91.
136. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1984). Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist 39: 341-50.
137. Kaltenthaler, Karl C. and Christopher J. Anderson (2001). Europeans and Their Money: Explaining Public Support for the Common European Currency. European Journal of Political Research 40(2): 139-70.
138. Kaufmann, Bruno and M. Dane Waters (eds.) (2004). Direct Democracy in Europe. A Comprehensive Reference Guide to the Initiative and Referendum Process in Europe. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
139. Key, Valdimer O. Jr. (1966). The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
140. Kinder, Donald R. (1986). Presidential Character Revisited, in Richard Lau and David Sears (eds.) Political Cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 233-56.
141. Kinder, Donald R. and Lynn M. Sanders (1990). Mimicking the Political Debate with Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative Action for Blacks. Social Cognition 8(1): 73-103.
142. Kinder, Donald R. and Lynn M. Sanders (1996). Divided by Color: Radical Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
143. Kirk, Lisbeth (2007). Treaty Made Unreadable to Avoid Referendums, says Amato, EUObserver.com, 16 July 2007.
144. Kriesi, Hanspeter (2005). Direct Democratic Choice. The Swiss Experience. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
145. Kriesi, Hanspeter Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak, and Marco Giugni (1995). New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press/UCL Press.
146. Krosnick, Jon A. (1988a). Attitude Importance and Attitude Change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24(3): 240-55.
147. Krosnick, Jon A. (1988b). The Role of Attitude Importance in Social Evaluation: A Study of Policy Preferences, Presidential Candidate Evaluation, and Voting Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55(2): 196-210.
148. Kuklinski, James H. and Paul J. Quirk (2001). Conceptual Foundations of Citizenship Competence. Political Behaviour 23(3): 285-311.
149. Kuklinski, James H. and Paul J. Quirk Jennifer Jerit, and Robert F. Rich (2001).The Political Environment and Citizen Competence. American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 410-24.
150. Laitin, David D. (2002). Comparative Politics: The State of the Subdiscipline, in I. Katznelson and H.V. Milner (eds.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline. New York: Norton.
151. Lassen, David Dreyer (2005). The Effect of Information on Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. American Journal of Political Science 49(1): 103-18.
152. Lau, Richard R. and David P. Redlawsk (1997). Voting Correctly. American Political Science Review 91(3): 585-98.
153. Laursen, Finn (1994). Denmark and the Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty, in F. Laursen and S. Vanhoonacker (eds.) The Ratification of the Maastricht Treaty, Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff, 61-86.
154. Lavine, Howard, Eugene Borgida, John L. Sullivan, and Cynthia J. Thomsen (1996). The Relationship of National and Personal Issue Salience to Attitude Accessibility on Foreign and Domestic Policy Issues. Political Psychology 17(2): 293-316.
155. Lawler, Peter (1997). Scandinavian Exceptionalism and European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 35(4): 565-94.
156. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet (1944). The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce.
157. LeDuc, Lawrence (2002). Opinion Change and Voting Behaviour in Referendums. European Journal of Political Research 41(6): 711-32.
158. LeDuc, Lawrence (2003). The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Toronto: Broadview Press.
159. Lijphart, Arend (1997). Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma. American Political Science Review 91(1): 1-14.
160. Lindberg, Leon N. and Stuart A. Scheingold (1970). Europe's Would-be Polity. Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
161. Lipset, Seymour Martin and Stein Rokkan (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction, in S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds.) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Crossnational Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
162. Lodge, Milton, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Shawn Brau (1995). The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation. American Political Science Review 89(2): 309-26.
163. Lupia, Arthur (1992). Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information. American Political Science Review 86(2): 390-403.
164. Lupia, Arthur (1994). Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections. American Political Science Review 88(1): 63-76.
165. Lupia, Arthur (2001). Dumber than Chimps? An Assessment of Direct Democracy of Voters, in L.J. Sabato, H.R. Ernst, and B.A. Larson (eds.) Dangerous Democracy? The Battle over Ballot Initiatives in America. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
166. Lupia, Arthur (2006). How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence. Critical Review 18(1): 217-32.
167. Lupia, Arthur (n.d.) Questioning Our Competence: Tasks, Institutions, and the Limited Practical Relevance of Common Political Knowledge Measures. Unpublished manuscript.
168. Lupia, Arthur and Richard Johnston (2001). Are Voters to Blame? Voter Competence and Elite Maneuvers in Referendums, in M. Mendelsohn and A. Parkin (eds.) Referendum Democracy. Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
169. Lupia, Arthur and John G. Matsusaka (2004). Direct Democracy: New Approaches to Old Questions. Annual Review of Political Science 7: 463-83.
170. Lupia, Arthur and Mathew D. McCubbins (1998). The Democratic Dilemma. Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
171. Lupia, Arthur and Mathew D. McCubbins and Samuel L. Popkin (2000). Beyond Rationality: Reason and the Study of Politics, in A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, and S. L. Popkin (eds.) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
172. Luskin, Robert C. (1987). Measuring Political Sophistication. American Journal of Political Science 31(4): 856-99.
173. Luskin, Robert C. (1990). Explaining Political Sophistication. Political Behavior 12(4): 331-61.
174. McCombs, Maxwell and Donald Shaw (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176-87.
175. McGuinness, Damien (2005). Going Dutch on the European Constitution, Der Spiegel, 27 May 2005.
176. McIver, John P. and Edward G. Carmines (1981). Unidimensional Scaling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
177. McKelvey, Richard and Peter C. Ordeshook (1986). Information, Electoral Equilibria and the Democratic Ideal. The Journal of Politics 48(4): 909-37.
178. McLaren, Lauren M. (2002). Public Support for the European Union: Cost/Benefit Analysis or Perceived Cultural Threat? The Journal of Politics 64: 551-66.
179. McLaren, Lauren M. (2004). Opposition to European Integration and Fear of Loss of National Identity: Debunking a Basic Assumption Regarding Hostility to the Integration Project. European Journal of Political Research 43: 895-911.
180. McLaren, Lauren M. (2006). Identity, Interests and Attitudes to European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
181. Madison, James (1787). The Federalist No. 10. The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection. Daily Advertiser, November 22, 1787.
182. Magleby, David B. (1984). Direct Legislation: Voting On Ballot Propositions In The United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
183. Mair, Peter (2000). The Limited Impact of Europe on National Party Systems. West European Politics 23(4): 27-61.
184. Mansergh, Lucy (1999). Two Referendums and the Referendum Commission: The 1998 Experience. Irish Political Studies 14(1): 123-31.
185. Marks, Gary and Marco Steenbergen (eds.) (2004). European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
186. Marks, Gary Carole J. Wilson, and Leonard Ray (2002). National Political Parties and European Integration. American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 585-94.
187. Marsh, Michael (1998). Testing the Second-Order Election Model after Four European Elections. British Journal of Political Science 28(4): 591-607.
188. Marsh, Michael and Mark N. Franklin (1996). The Foundations: Unanswered Questions from the Study of European Elections, 1979-1994, in C. van der Eijk and M.N. Franklin (eds.) Choosing Europe? Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 11-32.
189. Marthaler, Sally (2005). The French Referendum on Ratification of the EU Constitutional Treaty, 29 May 2005. Representation 41(3): 228-36.
190. Matsusaka, John G. (1995). Explaining Voter Turnout Patterns: An Information Theory. Public Choice 84(1-2): 91-117.
191. Matsusaka, John G. (2003). Direct Democracy, in C.K. Rowley and F. Schneider (eds.) Encyclopaedia of Public Choice. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
192. Mendelsohn, Matthew and Fred Cutler (2000). The Effect of Referendums on Democratic Citizens: Information, Politicisation, Efficacy and Tolerance. British Journal of Political Science 30: 685-701.
193. Mendelsohn, Matthew and Andrew Parkin (eds.) (2001). Referendums Democracy. Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
194. Merrill III, Samuel, and Bernard Grofman (1999). A Unified Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
195. Midtbø, Tor and Kjell Hines (1998). The Referendum-Election Nexus: An Aggregate Analysis of Norwegian Voting Behaviour. Electoral Studies 17(1): 77-94.
196. Mill, John Stuart (1970 [1888]). Two Methods of Comparison, in E. Amitai and F.L. Du bow (eds.) Comparative Perspectives: Theories and Methods. Boston, MA: Little Brown, 205-10.
197. Nelson, Thomas E. and Donald R. Kinder (1996). Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion. The Journal of Politics 58(4): 1055-78.
198. Nelson, Thomas E. and Zoe M. Oxley (1999). Issue Framing Effects and Belief Importance and Opinion. The Journal of Politics 61(4): 1040-67.
199. Nelson, Thomas E. and Zoe M. Oxley and Rosalee A. Clawson (1997). Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects. Political Behavior 19(3): 221-45.
200. Nentwich, Michael (1998). Opportunity Structures for Citizens' Participation. The Case of the European Union, in A. Weale and M. Nentwich (eds.), Political Theory and the European Union, London. London: Routledge, 125-40.
201. Niedermayer, Oskar and Richard Sinnott (eds.) (1995). Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
202. Nielsen, Hans Jørgen (1993). EF på Valg. Copenhagen: Columbus.
203. Nijeboer, Arjen (2005a). The First Dutch Referendum. A Pre-Ballot Assessment, Notre Europe Policy Paper no. 14.
204. Nijeboer, Arjen (2005b). People's Vengeances. The Dutch Referendum. European Constitutional Law Review 1: 393-405.
205. Norris, Pippa (1997). Second-Order Elections Revisited. European Journal of Political Research 31: 109-24.
206. O'Mahony, Jane (2001). Not So Nice: The Treaty of Nice, The International Criminal Court, the Abolition of the Death Penalty-the 2001 Referendum Experience. Irish Political Studies 16(1): 201-13.
207. Partin, Randall (2001). Campaign Intensity and Voter Information. A Look at Gubernatorial Contests. American Politics Research 29(2): 115-40.
208. Petersen, Nikolaj (1996). Denmark and the European Union 1985-96. A Two-Level Analysis. Cooperation and Conflict 31(2): 185-201.
209. Piar, Christophe and Jacques Gerstlé (2005). Le cadrage du référendum sur la Constitution européenne: la dynamique d'une campagne à rebondissements, in A. Laurent and N. Sauger (eds.) Le référendum de ratification du Traité constitutionnel européen: comprendre le non français, Cahier du CEVIPOF 42.
210. Popkin, Samuel L. (1991). The Reasoning Voter. Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
211. Qvortrup, Mads (2005). A Comparative Study of Referendums. Government by the People. 2nd edition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
212. Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, Eugene Borgida, and John L. Sullivan (1990). A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal, in J. A. Ferejohn and J. H. Kuklinski, (eds.) Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana/Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.
213. Raudenbush, Stephen W. and Anthony S. Bryk (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
214. Ray, Leonard (1999). Measuring Party Positions on European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey. European Journal of Political Research 36(2): 283-306.
215. Ray, Leonard and Hanne Marthe Narud (2000). Mapping the Norwegian Political Space: Results from an Expert Survey. Party Politics 6(2): 225-39.
216. Referendum Commission (2001). Arguments For & Against The Treaty of Nice. Dublin: The Referendum Commission.
217. Reif, Karlheinz (1984). National Electoral Cycles and European Elections 1979 and 1984. Electoral Studies 3(3): 244-55.
218. Reif, Karlheinz and Ronald Inglehart (eds.) (1991). Eurobarometer. The Dynamics of Public Opinion. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
219. Reif, Karlheinz and Hermann Schmitt (1980). Nine Second-Order National Elections. European Journal of Political Research 8(1): 3-44.
220. Riker, William H. (1982). Liberalism Against Populism. A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Co.
221. Romer, Thomas and Howard Rosenthal (1979). Bureaucrats Versus Voters: On the Political Economy of Resource Allocation by Direct Democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 93(4): 563-87.
222. Romer, Thomas and Howard Rosenthal (1978). Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo. Public Choice 33(4): 27-44.
223. Rosenstone, Steven J. (1983). Forecasting Presidential Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
224. Rosenstone, Steven J. and John Mark Hansen (1993). Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
225. Saglie, Jo (2000). Values, Perceptions and European Integration: The Case of the Norwegian 1994 Referendum. European Union Politics 1(2): 227-49.
226. Sauger, Nicolas, Sylvain Brouard, and Emiliano Grossman (2007). Les Français contre l'Europe? Les sens du référendum du 29 mai 2005. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.
227. Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger and David M. Farrell (2002). Do Political Campaigns Matter? Yes, But It Depends, in D.M. Farrell and R. Schmitt-Beck (eds.) Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums. London: Routledge.
228. Schneider, Gerald and Lars-Erik Cederman (1994). The Change of Tide in Political Cooperation: A Limited Information Model of European Integration, International Organization 48(4): 633-62.
229. Schneider, Gerald and Patricia Weitsman (1996). The Punishment Trap: Integration Referendums as Popularity Contests. Comparative Political Studies 28(4): 582-607.
230. Schuck, Andreas R. T. and Claes H. de Vreese (2006). Between Risk and Opportunity. News Framing and Its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement. European Journal of Communication 21(1): 5-32.
231. Schuck, Andreas R. T. (2008). The Dutch No to the EU Constitution: Assessing the Role of EU Skepticism and the Campaign. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 18(1): 101-28.
232. Sciarini, Pascal, Nicholas Bornstein, and Bruno Lanz (2007). The Determinants on Environmental Issues: A Two-Level Analysis, in C.H. de Vreese, (ed.) Dynamics of Referendums Campaigns. An International Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 234-66.
233. Scott, Dermot (1994). Ireland's Contribution to the European Union. Dublin: Institute for European Affairs.
234. Setälä, Maija (1999). Referendums and Democratic Government. New York: St. Martin's Press.
235. Shaw, Daron R. (1999). The Effect of TV Ads and Candidate Appearances on Statewide Presidential Votes, 1988-96. American Political Science Review 93(2): 345-61.
236. Shepsle, Kenneth A. (1972). The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition. American Political Science Review 66: 555-68.
237. Sinnott, Richard (2002). Cleavages, Parties and Referendums: Relationships Between Representative and Direct Democracy in the Republic of Ireland. European Journal of Political Research 41: 811-26.
238. Sinnott, Richard (2003a). Ireland: Turnout Decides. Presentation to the Conference on European Public Opinion, Brussels, September 18, 2003.
239. Sinnott, Richard (2003b). Attitudes and Behaviour of the Irish Electorate in the Second Referendum on the Treaty of Nice. URL: Siune, Karen and Palle Svensson (1993). The Danes and the Maastricht Treaty: The Danish EC Referendum of June 1992. Electoral Studies 12: 99-111.
240. Sinnott, Richard and Ole Tonsgaard (1992). Det blev et nej. Aarhus: Politica.
241. Sinnott, Richard and Ole Tonsgaard (1994a). The EU: The Danes Said 'No' in 1992, but 'Yes' in 1993: How and Why?, Electoral Studies 13(2): 107-16.
242. Sinnott, Richard and Ole Tonsgaard (1994b). fra et nej til et ja. Aarhus: Politica.
243. Skovmand, Sven (1977). 64 Sider af Danmarks Historien. Copenhagen: Det ny Notat.
244. Slothuus, Rune (2008). More Than Weighting Cognitive Importance: A Dual-Process Model of Issue Framing Effects. Political Psychology 29(1): 1-27.
245. Sniderman, Paul M. (2000). Taking Sides: A Fixed Choice Theory of Political Reasoning, in A. Lupia, M.D. McCubbins, and S.L. Popkin (eds.) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 67-75.
246. Sniderman, Paul M. Richard A. Brody, and Philip Tetlock (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
247. Sniderman, Paul M. James M. Glaser and Robert Griffin (1990). Information and Electoral Choice, in J.A. Ferejohn and J.H. Kuklinski (eds.) Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 117-35.
248. Snijders, Tom A. B. and Roel J. Boskers (1999). Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: Sage.
249. Socialistisk Folkeparti (1992). Forhandlingsudspil fra SF i tilfælde af et nej ved folkeafsteminingen om EF-union, 11 May 1992.
250. Sorroza, Alicia and Jose I. Torreblanca (2005). Ratification Monitor: Update Spain. Real Instituto Elcano.
251. Spinelli, Altiero (1989). Una strategia per gli Stati Uniti d'Europa. Bologna: Il Mulino.
252. Steenbergen, Marco and David Scott (2004). Contesting Europe? The Salience of European Integration as a Party Issue, in G. Marks and M. Steenbergen (eds.) European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
253. Suksi, Markku (1993). Bringing in the People. A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
254. Sulfaro, Valerie A. (1996). The Role of Ideology and Political Sophistication in the Structure Foreign Policy Attitudes. American Politics Quarterly 24(3): 303-37.
255. Sulkin, Tracy (2001). Explaining Campaign Intensity. American Politics Research 29(6): 608-24.
256. Stimson, James A. (2004). Tides of Consent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
257. Svensson, Palle (1994). The Danish Yes to Maastricht and Edinburgh. The EC Referendum of May 1993. Scandinavian Political Studies 17(1): 69-82.
258. Svensson, Palle (2002). Five Danish Referendums on the European Community and European Union: A Critical Assessment of the Franklin Thesis. European Journal of Political Research 41: 733-50.
259. Svensson, Palle (2003). Folkets Røst, Demokrati og Folkeafstemninger i Danmark og andre europæiske lande. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
260. Szczerbiak, Aleks and Paul Taggart (eds.) (2004). Choosing Union: The 2003 EU Accession Referendums: Special Issue of West European Politics, September 2004.
261. Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King (2003). CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin and Harvard University. Available at
262. Torreblanca, Jose I. (2005). Spain's Referendum on the European Constitution: A Double Disappointment. Real Instituto Elcano, ARI Paper No. 57/2005.
263. Uleri, Pier Vincenzo (1996). Introduction, in Michael Gallagher and Pier Vincenzo Uleri (eds.) The Referendum Experience in Europe. London: Macmillan Press.
264. van der Brug, Wouter and Cees van der Eijk (eds.) (2007). European Elections and Domestic Politics: Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
265. van der Eijk, Cees and Mark Franklin (2004). Potential for Contestation on European Matters at National Elections in Europe, in G. Marks and M. Steenbergen (eds.) European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
266. van der Eijk, Cees and Mark Franklin (eds.) (1996). Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
267. Wattenberg, Martin P. (1998). The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952-1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
268. Westlye, Mark C. (1991). Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
269. Widfeldt, Anders (2004). Elite Collusion and Public Defiance: Sweden's Euro Referendum in 2003. West European Politics 27(3): 503-18.
270. Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Steven J. Rosenstone (1980). Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
271. Worre, Torben (1992). Folkeafstemningen om den europæiske unionstraktat, 2. juni 1992, in B. Nüchel Thomsen (ed.) The Odd Man Out? Danmark og den europæiske integration 1948-1992, Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.
272. Worre, Torben (1995). First No, Then Yes: The Danish Referendums on the Maastricht Treaty 1992 and 1993. Journal of Common Market Studies 33(2): 235-58.
273. Zaller, John R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.