No clinical difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1653-1659

  Bailey, O ^a   Ferguson, K ^b   Crawfurd, E ^c   James, P ^d   May, P A ^a   Brown, S ^c   Blyth, M ^b   Leach, W J ^a  

^a WESTERN INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b GLASGOW ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c NORTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Fixed bearing; Knee; Mobile bearing; Rotating platform

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 84929702477     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2877-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R, Lup D, Luca L (2005) Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 20:145–153
2. Banks S, Bellemans J, Nozaki H, Whiteside LA, Harman M, Hodge WA (2003) Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410:131–138
3. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials.The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276:637–639
4. Bhan S, Malhotra R, Kiran E, Shukla S, Bijjawara M (2005) A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2290–2296
5. ®-rotating platform cruciate retaining endoprosthesis—a 6 year follow up. Knee 19:856–859
6. Burton A, Williams S, Brockett CL, Fisher J (2012) In vitro comparison of fixed- and mobile meniscal–bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasties: effect of design, kinematics, and condylar liftoff. J Arthroplast 27:1452–1459
7. Chouteau J, Lerat JL, Testa R, Moyen B, Fessy MH, Banks SA (2009) Kinematics of a cementless mobile bearing posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee 16:223–227
8. D’Lima DD, Trice M, Urquhart AG, Colwell CW (2001) Tibiofemoral conformity and kinematics of rotating-bearing knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 386:235–242
9. Elwood JJ, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD (2012) Posterior cruciate-retaining, rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty: minimum 4-year follow-up study. Orthopedics 35:1699–1704
10. Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12
11. Gioe T, Glynn J, Sembrano J, Suthers K, Santos E, Singh J (2009) Mobile and fixed-bearing (all polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2104–2112
12. Haider H, Garvin K (2008) Rotating platform versus fixed-bearing total knees: an in vitro study of wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2677–2685
13. Hamai S, Moro-oka TA, Dunbar NJ, Miura H, Iwamoto Y, Banks SA (2013) In vivo healthy knee kinematics during dynamic full flexion. Biomed Res Int. PMID: 23509767
14. Harrington M, Hopkinson W, Hsu P, Manion L (2009) Fixed-vs mobile- bearing total knee arthroplasty. Does it make a difference?—A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplast 24:24–27
15. Huang CH, Ma HM, Liau JJ, Ho FY, Cheng CK (2002) Osteolysis in failed total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:2224–2229
16. Jacobs W, Christen B, Wymenga A, Schuster A, Schaaf D, Ham A, Wehrli U (2012) Functional performance of mobile versus fixed bearing total knee prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1450–1455
17. Jolles BM, Grzesiak A, Eudier A, Dejnabadi H, Voracek C, Pichonnaz C, Aminian K, Martin E (2012) A randomised controlled clinical trial and gait analysis of fixed-and mobile-bearing total knee replacements with a five-year follow- up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:648–655
18. Kalisvaart M, Pagnano M, Trousdale R, Stuart M, Hanssen A (2012) Randomized clinical trial of rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no clinically detectable differences at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:481–489
19. Kim D, Seong SC, Lee MC, Lee S (2012) Comparison of the tibiofemoral rotational alignment after mobile and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:337–345
20. Kim Y-H, Kim J-S, Choe J-W, Kim H-J (2012) Long-term comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements in patients younger than fifty-one years of age with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:866–873
21. Ladermann A, Lubbeke A, Stern R, Riand N, Fritschy D (2008) Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with med-term results at 7 years. Knee 15:206–210
22. McEwan HM, Barnett PI, Bell CJ, Auger DD, Stone MH, Fisher J (2005) The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech 38:357–365
23. Namba RS, Inacio MCS, Paxton EW, Ake CF, Wang C, Gross TP, Marina-Dabic D, Sedrakyan A (2012) Risk of revision for fixed versus mobile-bearing primary total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1929–1935
24. Nutton RW, Wade FA, Coutts FJ, van der Linden ML (2012) Does a mobile- bearing, high-flexion design increase knee flexion after total knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1051–1057
25. O’Rourke MR, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnson RC (2002) Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design: five to eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1362–1371
26. Pijls B, Valstar E, Kaptein B, Nelissen R (2012) Differences in long-term fixation between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee prosthesis at ten to 12 years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1366–1371
27. Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard D, Juszczak E, Carter S, White S, Steiger R, Dodd CAF, Gibbons M, McLardy-Smith P, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW (2003) A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:62–67
28. Rees JL, Beard DJ, Price AJ, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2005) Real in vivo kinematic differences between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432:204–209
29. Rossi R, Bruzzone M, Bonasia DE, Ferro A, Castoldi F (2010) No early tibial tray loosening after surface cementing technique in mobile-bearing TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1360–1365
30. Sawaquchi N, Majima T, Ishiqaki T, Mori N, Terashima T, Minami A (2012) Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty improves patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact stress: in vivo measurements in the same patients. J Arthroplasty 25:920–925
31. Smith H, Jan M, Mahomed N, Davey JR, Gandhi R (2011) Meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical outcomes comparing mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 26:1205–1213
32. Stoner K, Jerabek SA, Tow S, Wright TM, Padgett DE (2013) Rotating-platform has no surface damage advantage over fixed-bearing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:76–85
33. van Stralen RA, Anderson PG, Wymenga AB (2013) The self-aligning knee prosthesis: clinical and radiological outcome and survival analysis of a cruciate retaining meniscal bearing knee at 10-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc PMID: 23839209
34. Tibesku CO, Daniilidis K, Skwara A, Dierkes T, Rosenbaum D, Fuchs-Winkelmann S (2011) Gait analysis and electromyography in fixed-and mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective, comparative study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:2052–2059
35. Tibesku CO, Daniilidis K, Vieth V, Skwara A, Heindel W, Fuchs- Winkelmann S (2011) Sagittal plane kinematics of fixed-and mobile-bearing total knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1488–1495
36. Watanabe T, Ishizuki M, Muneta T, Banks SA (2012) Matched comparison of kinematics in knees with mild and severe varus deformity using fixed-and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 27:924–928
37. Wolterbeek N, Nelissen RG, Valstar ER (2012) No differences in in vivo kinematics between six different types of knee prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:559–564