Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years

Knee

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 206-210

  Ladermann A ^a   Lubbeke A ^a   Stern, R ^a   Riand, N ^a   Fritschy, D ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Bearing; Fixed bearing; Mobile bearing; Platform; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; JOINT STIFFNESS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATELLA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEPSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 42749089846     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aglietti P., Baldini A., Buzzi R., Lup D., and De Luca L. Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplast 20 (2005) 145-153
2. Bhan S., Malhotra R., Kiran E.K., Shukla S., and Bijjawara M. A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87 (2005) 2290-2296
3. Biau D., Mullins M.M., Judet T., and Piriou P. Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14 (2006) 927-933
4. Buechel F.F., and Pappas M.J. Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260 (1990) 162-169
5. Buechel F.F., and Pappas M.J. New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings. Orthop Clin North Am 20 (1989) 147-177
6. Chiu K.Y., Ng T.P., Tang W.M., and Lam P. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: one mobile-bearing and one fixed-bearing. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 9 (2001) 45-50
7. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (1988), Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
8. Colizza W.A., Insall J.N., and Scuderi G.R. The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77 (1995) 1713-1720
9. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 (1989) 9-12
10. Goodfellow J.W., and O'Connor J. The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Jt Surg Br 60 (1978) 358-369
11. Hansson U., Toksvig-Larsen S., Jorn L.P., and Ryd L. Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total knee replacement: a randomised radiostereometric study. Knee 12 (2005) 414-418
12. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., and Scott W.N. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248 (1989) 13-14
13. Jacobs W., Anderson P., Limbeek J., and Wymenga A. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty for post-operative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2004) CD003130
14. Khaw F.M., Kirk L.M., and Gregg P.J. Survival analysis of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 16 (2001) 161-167
15. Kim Y.H., Kim D.Y., and Kim J.S. Simultaneous mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement in the same patients: a prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes using a similar design of prosthesis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89 (2007) 904-910
16. Kim Y.H., Kook H.K., and Kim J.S. Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392 (2001) 101-115
17. O'Connor J.J., and Goodfellow J.W. Theory and practice of meniscal knee replacement: designing against wear. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 210 (1996) 217-222
18. Price A.J., Rees J.L., Beard D., Juszczak E., Carter S., White S., et al. A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Br 85 (2003) 62-67
19. Ranawat C.S., Komistek R.D., Rodriguez J.A., Dennis D.A., and Anderle M. In vivo kinematics for fixed and mobile-bearing posterior stabilized knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418 (2004) 184-190
20. Rasquinha V.J., Ranawat C.S., Cervieri C.L., and Rodriguez J.A. The press-fit condylar modular total knee system with a posterior cruciate-substituting design. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88 (2006) 1006-1010
21. Ridgeway S., and Moskal J.T. Early instability with mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a series of 25 cases. J Arthroplast 19 (2004) 686-693
22. Rodricks D.J., Patil S., Pulido P., and Colwell Jr. C.W. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89 (2007) 89-95
23. Schai P.A., Thornhill T.S., and Scott R.D. Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system. Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80 (1998) 850-858
24. Stiehl J.B., Hamelynck K.J., and Voorhorst P.E. International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 30 (2006) 190-199
25. Ware Jr. J., Kosinski M., and Keller S.D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34 (1996) 220-233
26. Woolson S.T., and Northrop G.D. Mobile- vs. fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiologic study. J Arthroplast 19 (2004) 135-140