Functional performance of mobile versus fixed bearing total knee prostheses: A randomised controlled trial

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1450-1455

  Jacobs, W C H ^a   Christen, B ^b   Wymenga, A B ^c   Schuster, A ^c   van der Schaaf, D B ^c   ten Ham, A ^c   Wehrli, U ^c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Salem Spital   (Switzerland)

^c Sint Maartenskliniek ^*  (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Functional performance; Knee arthroplasty; Knee flexion; Mobile bearing; Osteoarthritis; Prostheses and implants

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84864381984     PISSN: 09422056     EISSN: 14337347     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1684-9     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Banks S, Bellemans J, Nozaki H, Whiteside LA, Harman M, Hodge WA (2003) Knee motions during maximum flexion in fixed and mobile-bearing arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 410: 131-138.
2. Banks SA, Hodge WA (2004) Implant design affects knee arthroplasty kinematics during stair-stepping. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426: 187-193.
3. Bauze AJ, Falworth MS, Oakeshott RD (2009) Early results of total knee arthroplasty with a low contact stress anteroposterior glide. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 17(2): 174-178.
4. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276(8): 637-639.
5. European agency for the evaluation of medicinal products ICH topic E6: guideline for good clinical practice (1997) http://www. emea. europa. eu/pdfs/human/ich/013595en. pdf.
6. Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 9-12.
7. Haas B, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Brumley JT, Hammill C (2001) Range of motion of posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacements: the effect of bearing mobility. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A Suppl 2(Pt 1): 51-55.
8. Henricson A, Dalen T, Nilsson KG (2006) Mobile bearings do not improve fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 448: 114-121.
9. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248: 13-14.
10. Jacobs W, Anderson P, Limbeek J, Wymenga A (2004) Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty for post-operative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD003130.
11. Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB (2005) Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement: a systematic literature review within the Cochrane framework. Acta Orthop 76(6): 757-768.
12. Kim YH, Kim DY, Kim JS (2007) Simultaneous mobile- and fixed-bearing total knee replacement in the same patients. A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes using a similar design of prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(7): 904-910.
13. Kim YH, Kook HK, Kim JS (2001) Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392: 101-115.
14. Mockel G, Perka C, Gabler J, Zippel H (2004) Early postoperative functional differences between total knee arthroplasties supplied with mobile-bearing platform or fixed-bearing system-an analysis of gait pattern. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142(1): 40-45.
15. Oh KJ, Pandher DS, Lee SH, Sung JS Jr, Lee ST (2008) Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24(6): 873-884.
16. Post ZD, Matar WY, van de Leur T, Grossman EL, Austin MS (2010) Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: better than a fixed-bearing? J Arthroplasty 25(6): 998-1003.
17. Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard D, Juszczak E, Carter S, White S, de SR, Dodd CA, Gibbons M, Lardy-Smith P, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW (2003) A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(1): 62-67.
18. Rees JL, Beard DJ, Price AJ, Gill HS, Lardy-Smith P, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2005) Real in vivo kinematic differences between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432: 204-209.
19. Smith H, Jan M, Mahomed NN, Davey JR, Gandhi R (2011). Meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical outcomes comparing mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty: PMID: 21295940.
20. Tibesku CO, Daniilidis K, Vieth V, Skwara A, Heindel W, Fuchs-Winkelmann S (2011) Sagittal plane kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(9): 1488-1495.
21. van der Bracht H, van MG, Verdonk P, Almqvist KF, Verdonk R, Freeman M (2010) Is there any superiority in the clinical outcome of mobile-bearing knee prosthesis designs compared to fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis designs in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint? A review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(3): 367-374.
22. Watanabe T, Tomita T, Fujii M, Hashimoto J, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H (2005) Comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees in bilateral total knee replacements. Int Orthop 29(3): 179-181.