Differences in long-term fixation between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee prostheses at ten to 12 years' follow-up: A single-blinded randomised controlled radiostereometric trial

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 94 B, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1366-1371

  Pijls, B G ^a   Valstar, E R ^a   Kaptein, B L ^a   Nelissen, R G H H ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM DERIVATIVE; INERT GAS; POLYETHYLENE; STEARATE CALCIUM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FIXED BEARING TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; FOLLOW UP; GAMMA IRRADIATION; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOBILE BEARING TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84867319903     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B10.28858     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ. Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;260:162-169. (Pubitemid 20381533)
2. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, et al. Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 2001;50:431-449.
3. Wolterbeek N, Nelissen RG, Valstar ER. No differences in in vivo kinematics between six different types of knee prostheses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012;20:559-564.
4. Oh KJ, Pandher DS, Lee SH, Sung Joon SD Jr, Lee ST. Meta-analysis comparing outcomes of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:873-884.
5. Smith H, Jan M, Mahomed NN, Davey JR, Gandhi R. Meta-analysis and systematic review of clinical outcomes comparing mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1205-1213.
6. Van der Bracht H, Van Maele G, Verdonk P, et al. Is there any superiority in the clinical outcome of mobile-bearing knee prosthesis designs compared to fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis designs in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint? A review of the literature. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;18:367-374.
7. Wen Y, Liu D, Huang Y, Li B. A meta-analysis of the fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131:1341-1350.
8. Kim YH, Kim JS, Park JW, Joo JH. Comparison of the low contact stress and press fit condylar rotating-platform mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2011;93-A:1001-1007.
9. Watanabe T, Tomita T, Fujii M, et al. Comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees in bilateral total knee replacements. Int Orthop 2005;29:179-181. (Pubitemid 40922344)
10. Woolson ST, Epstein NJ, Huddleston JI. Long-term comparison of mobile-bearing vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1219-1223.
11. Carothers JT, Kim RH, Dennis DA, Southworth C. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:537-542.
12. Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry: a method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1989;232:1-51. (Pubitemid 19274412)
13. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D, et al. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA2001;285:1987-1991. (Pubitemid 32366951)
14. Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, et al. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 2005;76:563-572. (Pubitemid 41232789)
15. Garling EH, Valstar ER, Nelissen RG. Comparison of micromotion in mobile bearing and posterior stabilized total knee prostheses: a randomized RSA study of 40 knees followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop 2005;76:353-361. (Pubitemid 41039351)
16. Pijls BG, Dekkers OM, Middeldorp S, et al. AQUILA: assessment of quality in lower limb arthroplasty: an expert Delphi consensus for total knee and total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:173.
17. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:13-14. (Pubitemid 20204775)
18. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248:9-12. (Pubitemid 20204774)
19. Kaptein BL, Valstar ER, Stoel BC, Rozing PM, Reiber JH. A new type of model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for solving the occluded marker problem. J Biomech 2005;38:2330-2334. (Pubitemid 41265867)
20. Collier MB, Engh CA Jr, Hatten KM, et al. Radiographic assessment of the thickness lost from polyethylene tibial inserts that had been sterilized differently. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:1543-1552. (Pubitemid 351947597)
21. Hide IG, Grainger AJ, Wallace IW, Hui A, Campbell RS. A radiological technique for the assessment of wear in prosthetic knee replacements. Skeletal Radiol 2000;29:583-586.
22. Albrektsson BE, Carlsson LV, Freeman MA, Herberts P, Ryd L. Proximally cemented versus uncemented Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:233-238.
23. DeSouza CM, Legedza AT, Sankoh AJ. An overview of practical approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials. J Biopharm Stat 2009;19:1055-1073.
24. Hansson U, Toksvig-Larsen S, Jorn LP, Ryd L. Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total knee replacement: a randomised radiostereometric study. Knee 2005;12:414-418. (Pubitemid 41606115)
25. Henricson A, Dalén T, Nilsson KG. Mobile bearings do not improve fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;448:114-121. (Pubitemid 44324858)
26. Bottlang M, Erne OK, Lacatusu E, Sommers MB, Kessler O. A mobile-bearing knee prosthesis can reduce strain at the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;447:105-111. (Pubitemid 44324902)
27. Engh GA, Zimmerman RL, Parks NL, Engh CA. Analysis of wear in retrieved mobile and fixed bearing knee inserts. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(Suppl):28-32.