Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty improves patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact stress. In vivo measurements in the same patients

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 920-925

  Sawaguchi, Naohiro ^a   Majima, Tokifumi ^a   Ishigaki, Takayuki ^a   Mori, Noriaki ^a   Terashima, Takashi ^a   Minami, Akio ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Mobile bearing knee prosthesis; Navigation; Patellofemoral joint; TKA

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTACT STRESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JOINT MOBILITY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATELLA LIGAMENT; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; ROTATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATELLA; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TIBIA;

EID: 77955920247     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.024     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. McEwen H.M., Barnett P.I., Bell C.J., et al. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech 2005, 38:357.
2. Bartel D.L., Bicknell V.L., Wright T.M. The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986, 68:1041.
3. Sathasivam S., Walker P.S. Optimization of the bearing surface geometry of total knees. J Biomech 1994, 27:255.
4. Callaghan J.J., Insall J.N., Greenwald A.S., et al. Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect 2001, 50:431.
5. Engh G.A. Failure of the polyethylene bearing surface of a total knee replacement within four years. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988, 70:1093.
6. Callaghan J.J., Squire M.W., Goetz D.D., et al. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82:705.
7. Ranawat A.S.R.R., Loreti I., et al. Patellofemoral tracking in posterior stabilized mobile bearing total arthroplasty [abstract]. East Orthop Assoc Poster 2004, P6.
8. Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., Stuart M.J., et al. Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: a prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 221.
9. Matsuda S., Ishinishi T., White S.E., et al. Patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty. Effect on contact area and contact stress. J Arthroplasty 1997, 12:790.
10. Stukenborg-Colsman C., Ostermeier S., Hurschler C., et al. Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs. Acta Orthop Scand 2002, 73:638.
11. Rees J.L., Beard D.J., Price A.J., et al. Real in vivo kinematic differences between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 204.
12. Laskin R.S. Lateral release rates after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 88.
13. Berger R.A., Rubash H.E., Seel M.J., et al. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993, 40.